Posted:
What in the world do you guys smoke before writing these episodes????
There are contradictions not just from one episode to the next but one scene to the other.
Let's see what I remember (and please feel free to correct or add more to this list)
1. Weren't Karan-Dimpy-Nachiket and Ragini supposed to be college mates? Even during the sangeet ceremony, four of Nachiket's college mates came and danced and mentioned how Ragini used to get jealous even then??? ----- So now, they know each other because Ragini used to work for Nachiket's family???
2. How in the world did Ragini give Nachiket back his grandfather's wealth because the stipulation in the will was that if he doesn't marry Ragini, the money will be divided in half, with Nachiket getting one half, and the other going to a trust fund ---- does Ragini own the trust fund or something??? And Pam was conveniently left out of the will...also, what happened to Nachiket's father who was apparently fond of Ragini - Pam mentions it during her flashback scene with Ragini when they first meet at Nishi's engagement...
3. When Ragini wanted to sell her house/apartment for Nishi's wedding, didn't her mother mention that Ragini's father bought the place for her after her divorce with Nachiket so that her future is secure----and conveniently enough in the flashback, her father was never in the picture, she only had her grandmother and mother???
4. Oh, and I am not going to get into the whole age and math factor...nothing adds up in the telly world anyways.
I'm sure there are more but ...it just baffles me how glaring and inconsistent the storyline is.
And a special mention...when a guy proposes to a girl, he has the ring facing her when he opens the box, not facing himself...
Indian Mythology
