Respect the relationship - Page 5

Originally posted by: cutebarun

Friends... This topic is not directly abt d show. Its about some common unhealthy practices that is in d forum...

I'm talking about the 'brother-sister' bond, n d reactions in d forum. People may or may not like Arnav-Anjali sibling bond, sometimes we dont like actors... N its fine when people say Anjali is over dependant or Arnav is over protective. I respect, that as every one's perspective... And frm d story POV.

Bt, apart frm d story angle, most of d times, we hav posts insulting a 'bro-sis' relationship... Like people find it 'pukeworthy' when a 'sister' touches her brother's face.

A 'brother' lifting his 'fainting sister' in his arms is seen as 'cringeworthy'...

Two siblings hugging each other evokes posts in d forum saying 'eeewww..'

let alone d story. Is this our view towards sibling relationships are? I dont have a sibling, bt i hav always admired my friend giving her brother aged 20, a pat on his shoulder n a kiss on his forehead... N she is not a motherly figure. She is just 23...

Do we find it 'awkward' when a father kisses his grown up daughter's cheek or vice versa?

Doesnt a 30yr old man hug his Mom... Do we feel bad then?

I'm not at all bringing the 'story scenario' of d show. Bt, it hurts to read such comments abt 'sibling bond' as it somwhere equates to d real life relationships.

Many found it awkward when a sister decided to share the baby video (sonography) with a brother... Is it dat awkward? I knw a friend, whose friend is alive now, just becoz of him. She was in the 4th month of her pregnancy... N she somehow had a miscarriage. It was her male friend who carried her frm the pool of blood to d hospital. Do we hav to see it as 'cringeworthy'? As, pregnancy n relatd topics r 'girly things'...

This post is not aimed at 'moral policing' or against d 'freedom of opinion'. Its just abt keeping d innocence of relationships bcoz I'm sure no one in d world will dare to say 'A grown up man n his mom hugging each other n sharing a few cute n affectionate' moments as 'cozying with each other'.



The post is not meant to hurt anyone. Just stating what i saw in d forum.



'Seeing a pure sibling relationship thru d shades of 'Physical proximity', does hurt... It is the worst insult...!

i agree wiz u...wtz wrong wiz ppl now a days?

I agree with what you said. A brother and sister share the most refined relations of all and its only immoral to point fingers at it. BUT , There's always a but! lol I wont necessarily blame the audience for not understanding Arnav and Anjali's relationship in particular because to be honest I don't really get it either.

@riti... Realy dear! We hav to hav to hav to tell this aloud...

@mpk... The way u explain things so strongly n 'to the point'... I get goose bumps reading them darlingwa!

@payasa... Yaar, its great dat u dont come to d main forum always... Sometimes, d situation is so worse dat we wud imagine ourselves 'closing our ears with both hands n shouting... 'nahiii... Ek bhai behan rishte ke baare mein, tum kya jaano forumwa...'

Originally posted by: dmgloverforever

I agree with what you said. A brother and sister share the most refined relations of all and its only immoral to point fingers at it. BUT , There's always a but! lol I wont necessarily blame the audience for not understanding Arnav and Anjali's relationship in particular because to be honest I don't really get it either.

For a regular audience, Who are use to seeing brothers and sisters as nok-jhok buddies, always pulling pranks but still caring. Anjali and Arnav's relationship is rather new. Here are two siblings who just have each other to depend on , to rely on. These two will definitely have a different bond then "normal" parented brothers & sisters. Its a whole new concept and if not introduced properly could lead to conflict. And CVs by all means failed to portray the pulchritude of this sacred bond.

My grandparents passed away when my mom was just in 10th grade and ever since their death My uncle, who was a college graduate at the time has been responsible for my mother. So, I know what an orphan sibling bond is like And its definitely not like the one we see in IPK. not as melodramatic at least. Yes there is interdependence and insecurity but NOT to this EXTENT, especially after you're married. And showing otherwise is just giving the wrong message.

Another thing that badgers me about their relationship is the mere portrayal of Anjali.She is the older sister , So considering the matter of course she should've been the more responsible one rather then the over depending one. The older sibling is usually the one that makes sacrifices and not the other way around but Just to give Arnav's character all the glory CVs besmirched Anjali's role, A role of an older sister.

So , I'll say it again, Yes its wrong to point fingers at a pure relationship but you cant really blame the viewers for doing so in this case as the sibling bond portrayed in the show is quite muddled up within itself to be honest. So don't take offence when people sometimes cross the line as its merely due to the confusion and frustration caused by CVs not because they are cavemen and don't understand the significance of a relationship as pure as that of a brother and sister.

Agreed! The cause, I think, of such obscenely assumptions regarding a pure relationship is because of the CV's inability to depict the bond between Arnav and Anjali...Or does the blame for this unconvincing portrayal lie at the director/actor's door, both of whom are equally responsible for what we see on the screen.

@TM - Trust me, no one would willfully have such distasteful thinking. It is what they SEE that they interpret and sometimes that can go woefully wrong as is the case now.

@dmgloverforever... Friend, i understand when people say 'Arnav n Anjali' r over dependant. Its not d cvs failure or the 'Arnav Anjali' story dat is the topic here.

No matter how horribly the cvs show it or establish it, we should not be making posts saying 'eeeww...its pukeworthy' when a bro hugs a sis.

Just imagine, Shyam who is d villain of d story..has a sister. We knw how Shyam is... How he deceivd his wife n lustd outside marriage. Bt, having Shyam as d 'real bad guy' doesnt giv us the right to find it disgusting, when 'Shyam hugs his mother or sister'... That bond is stil pure.

Originally posted by: cutebarun

@dmgloverforever... Friend, i understand when people say 'Arnav n Anjali' r over dependant. Its not d cvs failure or the 'Arnav Anjali' story dat is the topic here.

No matter how horribly the cvs show it or establish it, we should not be making posts saying 'eeeww...its pukeworthy' when a bro hugs a sis.

Just imagine, Shyam who is d villain of d story..has a sister. We knw how Shyam is... How he deceivd his wife n lustd outside marriage. Bt, having Shyam as d 'real bad guy' doesnt giv us the right to find it disgusting, when 'Shyam hugs his mother or sister'... That bond is stil pure.

@madhatter...

This is not d fault of the cvs or d actors. Its just d prblm of conscience. If a mother n a man is sharing a hug, n even if both of them hav blank expressions on their face, we realy dont make disgusting coments on their 'physical proximity', if we knw dat they r 'mother n son'.

Here, in d forum every1 knws 'Anjali n Arnav' are siblings. I remind u again dat its not frm d curent story line dat i'm discussing this topic. At any point of d story, comenting on a 'bro sis' hug or kiss as 'cringeworthy' is purely hurting.

P.S. Dont bring in actors n cvs please, as I made clear in d main post itself dat, this isnt abt Justifying Arnav Anjali bond.

This post is not to criticise people who dont like that kind of a bond and Arnav Anjali equation n dependance. They r entitled to their opinion.

This post is only against those coments which saw a 'bro sis' relation as illicit/ disgusting etc. Dont confuse these two views.

👏👏👏