Originally posted by: Maya_M
For these talent contests I don't stress on singers with classical background. I don't want to listen contestants with aalaaps all the time. There are many who couldn't afford classical training but have gifted voice like Prashant.
The most important thing for me is connection with the audience along with beautiful renditions.
I would give a simple example. Karunya was the most talented singer in II-2. His classical background was intact and he sang exceptionally. Amey was equally good and now the difference between the two was Amey could connect with audience all the time whereas there were times when Karunya simply sang a brilliant song but there was so connection with the audience. Classical base or not, gifted talent touches everyone.
totally agree there ! Classical training or not, connection is what matters. But then again connection is a very personal thing. A lot of Amey's songs didn't touch me as much as Karunya's and a lot of Karunya's songs didnt touch me as much as his cousin's Hemachandra.
But then again, to claim that Classical music/training is bad is really wrong. There is def. a help to having classical training or knowledge. However, considering this is Indian Idol and not a judge based show, the connection is what matters.
Coming back to Prashant, that wasn't his song. He could be a pandit in classical music and still not be able to do justice to it.