What constitutes a character being called grey as opposed to being flawed? I think that is the real question.
All the characters of Harry Potter are flawed, there is no perfect character just as in life there is no perfect person. However the "greyness" of a character arises from what their intentions were.
For instance Harry, Hermoine, Ron, Hagrid's actions were geared towards the "white side" of things or the good side and therefore they would not be judged as grey characters.
However, characters such as Snape and Draco were portrayed as being more focused on the dark side of things, however they cannot be said to be truly evil like Voldermort. They appear to have some sort of conscience or feel some level of remorse for some of their "eviler" actions which makes them neither black nor white, good or bad but a shade in between - ie- grey.
As for the character of James, as someone mentioned earlier, yes in his youth, he may have pulled pranks or insulted others, but as he matured so did his moral compass too and was for the most part a more "white" character.
And as for Percy, though I disliked his character immensely, he was in fact geared towards the white side, though he was very ambitious and succumbed to peer pressure easily calling into question his shading.
Now my question is what about Umbridge? Is she a "grey character "or a misguided "white character"?
Edited by shellytt - 16 years ago