I just passed by today :)Truly speaking I like the start when Anjali said ''what's the big deal?'' to the media. - I too liked it when she said what's the bid deal, she was brave or may be it was audacity still she had the spark to tell off all those reporters who expected her to 'talk' when clearly she was being led inside with her face covered, reporters were doing their job but were they right in asking questions when they knew the girl is hardly 17. the way the reporter left the office and hurried to the place I felt may be anjali hurt herself, but they were all off in such hurry so they can catch the kid before she goes inside the station. if they did not then how can they give a spicy story to their paper. but in truth it was a big deal. A critical analysis of this episode involve different perspectives.
My analysis: SOCIETY POINT OF VIEW
It is morally incorrect and illegal for minors (girls/boys) under 16 to involve in physical intimacy.
We should definitely understand that we have been evolved and educated - the only reason we are said not to involve in physical intimacy is not because what others are going to think but because our bodies are not yet properly developed in order to accept the intercourse. - ditto nisha. kids should be busy busy busy, so their mind doesnot wander off to such things.
Has the show rightly deliver the message?
I guess this is where the host plays an important role to the teens. He said ''it is not cool'' and that was impactful. It is really not cool but then what was really ''NOT COOL'' - ''the self surrender'' or ''the sharing of that intimate moment''?
I should applaud the fact that it was focused towards ''Sharing the intimate moment'' was not a cool thing to do, and that also out of male ego and male anger. A moment of anger and ego failed two persons who were attracted to each other's lives - the same couple who could either call quits when they grew up or get into life. - that was the highlight of the episode where focus was put on one's morality. would people watch or share if it is one of their family members? Karan was very impactful in putting it across.
What is the hidden part of the show?
Who ruined the lives of these teenagers? Were they to be blamed? Was the other guy who posted the video only to be blamed or is there another hidden culprit who we failed to recognise?
From toppers to strugglers - the drastic twist in the life of Arpit and Anjalie?
Where both of them decided to escape from ''shame'' - Why this reaction?
Is it out of fear? Is it the fear of what others will tell them? or is it because the news was leaked everywhere around the world?
At the age of 25, mother of 2 - she may be happy and we can not judge her if it was her decision to rebuild her life by starting in marriage phase but it did not seem like this - it seemed the wedding was more like a parents' decisions - was it the real solution for the life of Anjali? Her mother resigned out of shame of her daughter???
It is again true that parents are part to be blamed - not only in the awareness on sex education but also on whether they would like to build their lives again by themselves or live on what others will think of them.
There was a hidden destructor of these kids' lives and that was the media?
When the girl and boy could still be unrevealed identity - media decided to sell their mistakes in order to make money? IS IT MORALLY CORRECT? The guy decided to sell on the internet and he was vile , however, he is not the only one to blame, majority of the blame goes to the media?
HOW A MISTAKE TURNS TO A SCANDAL -
A mistake can be rectified if only people who should be aware of it decided to solve it between themselves.
Another chance is permissible in this life , if the right persons are involved in it?
The video could have been sold but she is not the only girl who did it - there are so many gossips and leaked videos about celebs about worst videos like that - how come then that the celebs are still respected and that poor common girl has to change a line in her life????
If the name of the kids and families were kept anonymous, their lives would still be on a better sail - however media decided to spice the story,decided to ruin the family, defame the lives of the people - and that single mistake brought reputation of the family down - Should we still blame the victims only? Are media not also the one need to get on HOLD?
ON THE SAME GROUNDS OF SHARING INFORMATION ON ONE PRIVATE MOMENT IS ILLEGAL - WHAT IS THE MEDIA DOING?
The teenagers must respect the elders, by experience, those who are older than us have a better point. In teenage days, we are still discovering ourselves, we do not know yet what we really want and tend to follow what our caring persons thought best for us, it is true that many teenagers want to explore sexuality as a new awe for them but this is because they really have not proper knowledge on it. Many people nowadays grow from a dark experience and there is a high percentage where the dark phase involve around the ''physical closeness'' of the persons - we can not really each time guide or impose our beliefs to those persons who do not value our wise thoughts. However the only reason I personally feel why it is incorrect for minors not to involve in sexual intimacy because they have not yet live their identity fully,it will take them at least 8 years more to become who they really want and what they really are- where they can take their decisions by themselves, responsible of their actions, answerable to their consequences, and can also defy to some point of views of people they love as they know what they really want in life and how to achieve it.
Members Lounge
