Na thi, Na hai, Na Hogi

______Trigger warning ______

Sai really confessed what she really felt about her past marriage .

We all have been back and forth about what Sai feel about her ex husband now but I have always wonder what she think about her feeling now as a Matured women about her past marriage.

Let be elaborate

Sai was child when she got married to Virat barely legal. A teenager

She was put into a situation where she has no control over her life no protection , no support

She got married to this man who was in his late 20's who was got an opportunity to be an independent adult who had life experience , control over his life support of his family while she had non of these.

Sai faced alot of abuse from her husband family in all this her husband also abused her in alot of ways disrespect her, etc

But sometimes he would be sweet to her and claim to care for her

In a situation where no one has your back this adult supposedly your husband claim that he cares for you

Because you are desperate for that care that no one else will give you . You believe him and Slowly you started have feeling for him.

But keep in mind you are still in your early 20's

You still have dependency on this person because you are still getting a degree and financially your dependent on somewhere emotionally too

But now as a grown adult women when you look back at that equation

Was it really love ..??

Or a sick form of Stockholm syndrome

"Mujhe Virat Chavan me Dilchaspi na thi , na haii , na hogi"

I for once really hope that they really show more of this in this show where Sai talks about her feeling on her past marriage.

She was in a very vulnerable position and her husband who vowed to protect her , married her for this reason end up abusing her the most along with his family.

Grown men marrying young women who have lack of experience and emotional maturity so they can manipulate them, emotionally torture them ,abuse them is very normalize in our society

I think it's never to late to talk about these things

I don't trust the makers so will have to wait but whatever you said is true.

A Good post indeed. You do have a valid point. In any normal situation: this applies—- absolutely 👍🏼 Loved it. Keep it up. Good review.

You know a lot of people that i know personally have experienced this 😔 it’s just sad.

Thanks for tagging me❤️

Also keep tagging me❤️ love your POV!

Originally posted by: mysticriver

I don't trust the makers so will have to wait but whatever you said is true.

That's soo true ITV is know to glorifying abuse

But let's hope they show something along this line for once

Originally posted by: mysticriver

I don't trust the makers so will have to wait but whatever you said is true.

True that, as much as that dialogue is good, these makers will leave no chance of making Sai a flipper.

Scenes like these are always accompanied by distrust over makers🤷🏻‍♀️

Originally posted by: Devikadish

True that, as much as that dialogue is good, these makers will leave no chance of making Sai a flipper.

Scenes like these are always accompanied by distrust over makers🤷🏻‍♀️

This is sooo true :(

I really wish we had some spine in ITV

and not sheep followers

Every story is the same in itv mc does disgusting abusive things and the female lead forgives him at the end

Lol 😆 predictable sh!t every time

I think at the time when Sai said this dialogue, Pakhi was talking at the time of accident and said "Sai Mera pati and bete ko hasil karna chahti thi, infact chahti hai" and that is when Sai said "dilchaspi na thi, na hai, na hogi ". I guess here they are referring she does not have interest during the time of accident in past tense not before leap. I don't think makers will show Sai never loved Virat before leap.

When I heard that dialogue I found it weird specially the Na thi part but after watching that scene again I felt she's mostly talking about the post leap scenario. Pakhi was accusing Sai of snatching her husband and Sai clearly told I was never interested in YOUR HUSBAND which was absolutely true. She was not talking about pre leap where Virat was Sai's husband. At that time she indeed was in love with him but after she came to know about pakrat marriage she never showed any interest in Virat nor tried to break their marriage.

The writers will never show Sai was never in love with Virat because that will show Sai only in poor light. When Sai fell in love with him she was a matured adult not an 18 year old teenager. After butchering Virat's character umpteen number of times also they showed what Virat felt or is feeling for Sai is love so how can they show Sai never had any love for Virat? That will ruin Sai's characterization which the cvs will never make it happen.

I so agree with ur views on the marriage Sai has with Virat, for a long time i have been calling it Stockholm Syndrome.

In real life , an ideal situation ,Sai being an empathetic doctor she is she would have realised that the young Sai suffered from it given she had no real family to back her...

But then this is a tv show and this is not real. The makers have always established Virat and Sai as lovers and Sai's denials as something that she does in anger..Virat has gone back to being in I love Sai mode after his us aurat ki shakal nahi dekhni, after leading on Pakhi..So i am sure Sai will too have that phase, "where she gets back to Virat bahut ache pita or pati hain aur maine apni zindagi mei sirf unse mohabbat ki hai ".😒

Moreover If Sai does not go back to Virat, there is nothing for Virat or Pakhi in the show..The only good part abt Virat is that Sai loves him, his children love him. I am sure makers won't take that away from the lead.

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

When I heard that dialogue I found it weird specially the Na thi part but after watching that scene again I felt she's mostly talking about the post leap scenario. Pakhi was accusing Sai of snatching her husband and Sai clearly told I was never interested in YOUR HUSBAND which was absolutely true. She was not talking about pre leap where Virat was Sai's husband. At that time she indeed was in love with him but after she came to know about pakrat marriage she never showed any interest in Virat nor tried to break their marriage.

The writers will never show Sai was never in love with Virat because that will show Sai only in poor light. When Sai fell in love with him she was a matured adult not an 18 year old teenager. After butchering Virat's character umpteen number of times also they showed what Virat felt or is feeling for Sai is love so how can they show Sai never had any love for Virat? That will ruin Sai's characterization which the cvs will never make it happen.

Agreed. It was for the post leap scenario where P is the wife according to the narrative 🙄. During second marriage, Sai confessed with dhol-baaje that V is her first and last love. This holi too she almost confessed n then stopped k tum pe kisi aur ka haq hai.

Her only problem is VP shadi