Originally posted by: Moor278
The other important aspect came out in his words. Sai aur main... Mera beta.... subconsciously V has started disassociating P ... once again he didn't realize it before saying it. But he didn't seem guilty either after saying it.
Teams are out in open... Ash was the expected one. Ninad is surprisingly missing and I wonder where he will lean... towards V or towards Ash. 🤔
I my view, for V, Sai has been Vinu's mother. He acknowledges P's role as mother figure in Vinu's life. But he always considered Sai as the real mother. And I believe it was also the case in some twisted way even before he met Sai after leap. Yes, I'm still holding onto "Aai". But do you remember how V used to call Vinu "mera beta". P had to correct him or remind him. And at that time it used to be a request. More so because the marriage was still based on conditions that were acknowledged and adhered to by both parties. And Vinu was adopted by V. Why would V keep that discrimination as long as he didn’t have to maintain a real marriage with P.
Post Vinu's reveal - V's first thought after he knew the truth was to tell Sai. Not P. Because for him Sai is the real mother. It is only after P's condition worsened that he stepped back. Post that at many ocassions V has called P as Vinu's mother, including the intentional harsh statements he made to Sai to pacify P. But a person can lie in front of people. But will not lie to themselves. Therefore, I will ignore all those against his break down where he screamed and said "Sai tum hi Vinu ki maa ho". And that is what he actually believes.
I know makers are good at trolling us. And can also take us for a ride with one statement and take a complete detour. By creating circumstances where the words no longer can hold true. Yet! I still want to hold on to a dialogue that they gave V. "Sai mere bachon ki ma sirf tum hogi". These were V's words. And if he has been true on his words, he will only acknowledge Sai as the mother to his children. And it applies to Vinu.
Somewhere they will can to close loop to all that happened pre leap and connect it now.
Coming to precap... it needs to be seen in the broader context.
Most of you are upset with the fact that V is unable to draw boundaries with P if he is once again in love with Sai.
My 2 cents are these...
P is not going anywhere so soon. She is desperately clutching on straws.... Vinu and V... if she has focused on V, it means Vinu has probably thawed. Or she has realized that V is already gone to Sai.
Any which way, these are her attempts to be relevant... and by the makers to keep her relevant, V will the softer target.
The other thing is V isn't intent on breaking marriage with P. And it's a legal marriage.
With these 2 combined... P has all the haq whether the FD likes it or not. All of our fussing won't help since from the makers POV, P can do all this and more... and V can't stop her. (His haters would say he gave extreme lenient treatment to P when he was married to Sai... to ab usse otherwise expect karna would be foolish)
This is cringe and non cringe based on what anyone feels about VP marriage and it's validity.
Here I have a slightly different opinion. Yes, our POV about the marriage can define whether it is cringe or not. But for me it is not just the fact whether P is married to V or not.
Assuming he is. Two things are very clear to V and P. The marriage was based on conditions. It was P who wanted more going against the mutual agreement. (V gave her false hopes in between as he tried to get back at Sai). The fact that V does not love P (The fact that he loves Sai is not the concern here).
It is still cringe for me on these two grounds. Individual space and choice needs to be respected at all times. Even between spouses. If not "Marital abuse" would not have been a crime. It is the right to say "NO" even to a spouse and the other half to respect that. If P knows that V does not love her and is not interested in sharing a conjugal relationship with her, she CANNOT force herself on him, or pressurise him to get intimate. Just because he is a man does not make it right or not a matter of grave concern. It is equally wrong. And this is why it is cringy more than anything else. P trying to seduce him while she was married to Samrat was equally cringy to her trying to force him into getting physical without his consent even being married to him. This aspect makes it all wrong.
3