If Pakhi is wrong doesn't means Virat is right - Page 7

Honestly my favorite track would be vp rot in hell together and sai taking her kids away...😆

Chemistry wise i like them but the substance lost as per the story...Vanker seriously ruined leena's creation..He says that sairat will rise like phoenix from the ashes ..Unfortunately the ashes have flew and vanished into the thin air.. 😆

I’m new to Ghum and have been watching the older episodes.

Is the issue that Pakhi was touted as someone who lost in love and that’s why she turned out to be negative or she was impatient.

What confuses me about the show is everyone loving Pakhi so much and is the character different on paper vs what it appears on screen or the writers weren’t sure how to approach this character?

As far as Virat is considered, I think the writers thought people will accept his character no matter what but his victimization is catching up on and viewers are troubled by his actions

Originally posted by: The_aliciaa

Keeping away the shipper heart for once I am sure all will agree how Virat is coming out as the most toxic and the one who destroys everything himself but term it as fate but of course gets free pass because of his self victimization.

No matter love or loveless marriage, it is registered under law Virat having feelings for Sai will be termed as EXTRA MARITAL AFFAIR which is absolutely wrong,he still himself is claiming to be Pakhi's husband none forced him. Either give a closure to Pakhi, this is exactly what do naav pe savaar means

Rhi baat Sai Virat's marriage when they both doesn't want to be claimed as husband wife and now are terming each other as ex it itself nullify their wedding.

It was Virat who gave and is still giving repetitive assurance to Pakhi, post leap reassurances of you being my wife, those saat pheras Pakhi never asked but Virat was the one who took initiative.

Pakhi isn't saint but even Virat doesn't deserve even a little bit of defending, that'll be selective bashing for sake of shipping.

Shipping isn't wrong but defending will be I guess

I completely disagree with people who are defending him just because Pakhi is wrong, both are worst individually

Very good one! Totally agree. If the narrative is to show Pakhi so negative that Virat appears like a victim, then still SaiRat is compromised.

Virat has to give explanation to every damn thing he did with Pakhi. Even touching her repeatedly when he is pursuing Sai now. If there is no satisfactory explanation (which I dont think he has), then Sai coming back to him is a compromise. She would come back because she loves him and forgives him too. and ofcourse the kids need him. Not because he has proven his love.

Sai should say she loves him, probably the only man she will ever love. But she will not forgive him. For marrying the same woman who caused so much distress to her. Under any circumstances, Virat should not marry Pakhi. Even if Sai had died. Even if Sai had left him in haste. Even if he was losing Vinu otherwise. That is the lamest excuse actually. Vinu at the time was like any orphaned kid. Just because he found a connect with him, he cant marry a woman who destroyed his life and the reason for Sai to leave.

In my opinion, he cant undo it. He can never prove to Sai that he had no feelings for Pakhi. It is his biggest dhoka to Sai and her self-respect. Loving someone and living with them are two different things. Sai might love him, but cannot live with him in content and peace, while this doubt hangs in her mind.

Pakhi comes across as a stalker as someone obsessed with VC. She will go to any extent just to be relevant in his eyes. Her need for him is so high in her priorities that she has lost her ethical, moral emotional and intellectual balance. Virat has proof to see her maniac behaviour but instead of remedying it he feeds it with his vaadas. It is a story of self destruction due to obsession in the case of Pakhi and all round destruction due to indecision or inability to discriminate right and wrong in the case of Virat.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

End mei bandook leke maar dalegi Sairat ko yeh Patralekhaa and then atmahatya kar legi.

Holi hogi khoon ki holi 😭🤡

Have I ruined enough for everyone? 🤪

Won't be surprised if it happens tho. Didi pyaar mein itna ghum ho gayi ki usse hosh he nhi rha woh kya kar rhi thi bol kar justify karenge uss Cheez ko bhi

Just clarifying my stance here I agree to the opinions of both shippers and non shippers.

I can understand why shippers want their ship to sail while others don't want, none of the side is wrong for me because I am myself a pendulum in such case.

Neither I will expect that shippers will stop shipping nor I will force any non shipper to ship them.

Thanks for being part of the discussion

Love to both the sides 🤗

And please don't attack anyone, let's be more understanding to humans first than characters ❤️

MODs PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD.

Virat is very emotional and he always have guilt because of P when sam come during mimo track he was rude with P, P always give him guilt virat always think P comprise because of his before leap and after leap I told its BK who always bring P DDP in front of V, and blackmail emotionally even he bail P because of BK, virat problem is he always trust P and never think about her wrong intention he always give her leverage because of promise, sam death and now her ahsaan, now its time again BK bring her crime only she can do it

Both are equally responsible, but because of the relationship sai and Virat shared people wish and hope their misunderstandings would get cleared one day ! Otherwise … in so many instances Virat has been more loyal Pakhi through his actions .. though he time and again keeps justifying his actions by feeling self sympathy and saying sorry to himself

You mean the guy for whom his wife was dead and he was not able to overcome from her for more than an year, drinking, letting himself in the situations that can cause death ,that could have been a relief for him and the only reason he was alive was an adopted child and the kasam of his mother..... really getting court married without any rituals done and where a person didn't even get ahead in his life, always thinking about his dead wife having his photos in his drawer, having his child photo in his pocket his new wife is just a contract for him because of whom he was able to adopt the child. After 6-7 years of death of his wife he still doesn't allow the lady to come even close to him all these are just hlts if these doesn't seem to you to be loyalty then what it means I don't know? sorry😔

If V was loyal to Sai and only loved her, he'd have found a way to adopt as a single parent by using his position and influence. He'd made sure P left CN because that was Sai's last wish. He would not be best friends with the woman who plotted to kill his wife and ruined their marriage. He would not let her interfere in his life after everything she has done. He would have made sure that even though she was out on bail, Sai's wish of seeing her serve her time in jail for her crimes did happen. He'd never have got rid of Sai's memories from the house and have like 1-2 photos just for guilt sake. He'd never have dropped Sai's name from his just coz she was "dead". He'd have told Vinu all about his first wife just so the child he is raising would always know about the woman who should have been his mother even if she didnt exist. If he believed P was reformed then he could have allowed P to be kaku to his child that he adopted. But thats it. P could never be MOTHER to HIS child.

No matter how angry with Sai, if V was loyal to Sai and loved her, he might try to take out his anger by making her jealous- ok- but he would NEVER be admiring another woman's looks like a lover does with googly lustful eyes , he'd not be taking pheras with another woman promising her lifetime of togetherness.

The fact that he thinks P is some mahaan person, his bff etc shows that he failed to see what Sai pointed out about her even as she "died". He didnt maintain boundaries even then.

this was the same woman who made indecent proposals to him and then even as a supposed grieving widow- plotted to snatch Vinu and V from sAi clearly indicating she never did care about sam. she cheated Sai, him and his jeeva. but V forgot all that to show his faith in P.

Sai living or dead didnt impact Vs soft corner, unending trust and long rope to P despite proof of her every wrongdoing. He was willing to lose Sai- have her walk out with the child rather than support her. He couldnt stand by his wife during miscarriage, surrogacy and afterwards. He called her a bojh, samjhauta, anaath and accused her of being responsible for Sams death when it was him who asked her to seek Sams help instead of going to pick up his wife.

He didnt care to search hard enough for Sai and accepted she was dead unlike P - who he doesnt even love- but still he unwilling to give up and assume her dead.

He allowed P to slap his pregnant wife and didnt budge but when P was gonna be slapped by Sai for possessing a gun in the vicinity of a child, he jumped to defend her.

He cant even do his duty and get P arrested for illegal possession of arms or put her in a mental asylum for suicide.

Now he sees P poisoning Vinu- his innocent child- and all he does is warn her. thats it. Just useless words. but in reality P is still continuing with her plan- of keeping Vinu scared and mentally unstable irrespective of the warning.

P called Savi trouble, spewed venom- He got over that in no time and in next scene he was praising P for thinking a lot about Savi. What a joke!

So he does not know the first thing about love or loyalty.

He just does what he wants, blames others and circumstances. But whenever he claims to "love" Sai its all hogwash- she is his last priority. He knows she can handle herself, the kids, life , career. She would never do any wrong deliberately so he keeps on taking her for granted and inflicting harm. He didnt even take the high road and act dignified. He only feels sympathy for her and helps out when Sai is literally dying or in her most vulnerable state ever physically or mentally- like she has to be on the verge of falling down a cliff or having a panic attack or in a full blown hallucination in order for him to realize that sai is a human being with emotions and not a robot. He will push her to that brink of peak suffering himself and then "feel bad", claiming her never intended to do so to quell his own guilty conscience which reminds him that Sai is in pain because of him.

He repeatedly disregards his own voice of reason, his conscience to stop hurting Sai to go ahead and do it anyway.

He will never pause and think of any long term consequences of his actions. He will just jump right in and then blame everyone for the mess he creates.

If roles were reversed, and Sai did everything V has done with P with a random man and V was in her shoes- would he forget it all and accept that Sai had been loyal to him?

BIG FAT NO.

He jumped to conclusions when Ajinkya visited the bedroom to give notes in broad daylight in a house full of people.

He assumed that of all the people in the world Sai would choose to move on with the man who murdered her father- JM. Thats how much he misjudges and thats how disgusting his thinking is.

why is it that in ITV- its always a man thats given every leeway and a woman isnt?