We can stress on two points
1st virat actually said he had no problem with be P the surrogate.. When sai already got geeta
2nd stealing embryo without the consent of the mother. That's a crime..
Pakhi is antagonist so she is supposed to do such things.. The point is whether the law of protector addressing her crime.. Sai as a doctor should NOT allow her to carry their child because she knows all the consequences..
But again... Sai was not present when this happened. So even though it was not her consent, she will not go to the point of aborting the foetus just because the surrogate is not her choice. That's an even bigger crime and neither is Sai the kind of character to do this.
The only option for Sai is to accept whatever has happened. She really has no other option.
Look at it this way, if in a classic case of mistaken identity, if SaiRat embryo was inserted into some other woman and not P. Would Sai abort the baby?
The point is P is not her choice but P is medically fit and not legally. It's a very tricky situation.
V agreeing even half heartedly and under emotional pressure is still wrong.
This stealing embryo seems a good point. If we can quote some law on this.