Sirf zimmedari bina wada?

Hi all,

I was just wondering what would be the case if Virat never gave a promise to Pakhi to convince her to marry Samrat?

Let's say Virat left the decision to Pakhi and she decided to get married (ofcourse expecting Virat to be in the same house).

Would Virat have still told Sai that he would only take her responsibility? Would he have still told her I can never become your husband?

"Waada kar chuka hoon ki mere dil mein zindagi mein koi aur ladki nahi aayegi."

He never told her he used to love someone else or that his heart belongs to someone else. He told her mainly because he made such a promise and she understood that he had someone else in his life.

Would he have shared that he has a past if not for the waada? What do you guys think? It is not like only if he promises, he will not give place to someone else in his life, if he had wanted he would never let anyone in his life without the waada too.

Probably not,

he might be conflicted sure but I’m sure he would be upfront with Sai..

Probably say I had someone in my life, I haven’t moved on, it will take time.

but we never know.
it’s hard to predict...

Originally posted by: Svt611

Probably not,

he might be conflicted sure but I’m sure he would be upfront with Sai..

Probably say I had someone in my life, I haven’t moved on, it will take time.

but we never know.
it’s hard to predict...

True, hard to predict

The only reason he is getting away from the mistakes he makes or what Sai is going through because of Pakhi is that he had told Sai about this.

Him letting Sai know about this cannot be a justification for Sai's misery due to Pakhi. Her misery should be addressed in the present, him telling her about that only prepared her to not consider this like a normal marriage and to not have expectations from him which she is doing even if she is in hurt and even if she has started to develop feelings for him.

But what about all the emotional torture, humiliation that she is going through because of his ex? He never told her that his ex lives in the same house. He himself has no clue about who actually his ex is, how venomous she is, but this girl has to deal with her? This girl has to learn tameez, uski beizzati ho jayegi and ghar ki bahu ghar chodke chali jayegi.

Originally posted by: laksh

True, hard to predict

The only reason he is getting away from the mistakes he makes or what Sai is going through because of Pakhi is that he had told Sai about this.

Him letting Sai know about this cannot be a justification for Sai's misery due to Pakhi. Her misery should be addressed in the present, him telling her about that only prepared her to not consider this like a normal marriage and to not have expectations from him which she is doing even if she is in hurt and even if she has started to develop feelings for him.

But what about all the emotional torture, humiliation that she is going through because of his ex? He never told her that his ex lives in the same house. He himself has no clue about who actually his ex is, how venomous she is, but this girl has to deal with her? This girl has to learn tameez, uski beizzati ho jayegi and ghar ki bahu ghar chodke chali jayegi.

Women are always blamed sad reality of society

Wat u say is right. Virat never said he loved someone else bt sai from the few conversations understood that he has someone spl in his life and when he said i hav promised someone else meant he was in love with sumone else.

Even when he said he is ready to marry her she said how vl u explain that to ur best friend?

Problem now is nt the vaada. Virat clearly said sai abt his vaada and nt to expect anything from this marriage. Bt he is the one who expects her to behav like a normal wife. Sai stood by the deal. She never came in btwn virat nd his friend. Never ask what he talks to her y he talks to her and why he supports her. Even she was ok with hia trip and pakhi asking his clothes so that she can pack in one bag.

She stood by the deal they made though she had that emotional torture a wife has. Though she feels jealous at times she doesnt display that. Bt on other side virat behave opposite to deal. He expects her to recognise wat he does fr her. He feels jealoys when she talks abt other boys. He feels insecured or ignored whenevr she talks abt the deal. Amongst all this may be inorder to keep her with him he is trying more bt end up hurting her.

And the most importnt part is after saying openly everything to sai. And pakhi openly claiming right over virat infront of sai and virat openly saying certain things infront of sai when pakhi left the house he now denies he loved pakhi once upon a time.

Not just sai even pakhi feela virat loved her and loves her that is why she asked with so much hope whether he loved her. When he denied she blamed him totally fr her loneliness.

Problm is nt with sai or pakhi its with virat. So it very tough to guess what wud the scenario be if their was no vaada. I guess it wud be similar becoz sai wud their past feelings and though marriage was a deal pakhi wud be the same and evrything wud be same. Its just that sai wudnt be able to say u said that u had a comittmnt not me. And pakhi wud be more villiany because no vaada means virat moving on which she wudnt be able to digest.

Other than this nothing wud much owing to itv standards.