It's Really High Time!!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: notaquitter

I really liked ayeshas interview after the Roka news. How professionally and beautifully she corrected the anchor multiple times.

Virat Nahi gaya and its Neil. As ayesha I am very happy about their news
The PH should care about these interviews. They should just interview all the characters like in other shows, why just these two. Or change the title to Neil and aish Valentine celebration, no one is going to say anything.

If it’s a celebration on set for ghkkpm then everyone should be present and characters should be celebrated

PH's only care about IV's - when their ratings are struggling to get a boost somehow. In the present day of social media, PH doesn't need to invite a channel to IV them - they can shoot an IV & post it on their social handles, say for instance - share it to SP's social handles.

NO PH ask channels to post a specific headline for their show's segment, its the news channel's own creativity - if headline goes - Neil's & Aishwarya's first Valentine day, viewers may not recognize who they are, probably will not watch it either .. but if they post it as Virat & Paakhi's first Valentines day, its a eye grabber & watch it - even those who may not be following the show.

Originally posted by: basherz

geez ! You people have an issue with off-screen issues too ?

And why should an actor be replaced ? Did they do injustice to their role ? Are they causing issues with the shooting schedules ? After you can counter all these questions, do also enlighten - who's gonna pay the monthly expenses of the actor because you want someone to be replaced, not because of their work but because of their off-screen life ?

And no need to apologize for silly things, people must learn to differentiate between on-screen & off-screen.

As a viewer, I don't give a damn about who talks in interviews or who are friends or enemies off-set, that's none of my business. I'm here to watch the show, I don't care about the off-screen drama. Show is an entertainment to me - good or bad, their off-screen drama isn't.

first of all i said nothing about them actors off the job or anything. so am gonna igonre those lines as they are not meant for my post. 😆

And why would TRP audience need to know about Sai's POV through an Interview ? As a viewer, I need to know her POV through the show, not some stupid IV.

they are running the show called SBS for a long time which means they are getting TRPs which also means that the people do watch it and most of the TV audiences wont have time to thing and discuss this much as we do on the forum and understand pov's. when they watch such shows like SBS and hear what actors are saying they do believe it. even though the percentage is less jithne bhi loge dekh rahe hai they are also are the audience.

even i come under an audience as i do watch SBS segment and i want to see ayiesha's which mean's sai's pov. and i guess there are many people out there like me who would want to do so. that is my opinion and am sharing it on this forum as it is open forum.

Just because some fans are obsessed watching the show online with IV's & all, doesn't mean everyone follows them. More than half the viewers don't even have a clue about these SBS & whatever else tv news shows that are around..

like ai mentioned above, percentage doesn't matter, even single audience is an audience. and here am talking about how aish and neil gets to share their pov and as a fan i want to here ayesha (sai's) pov as well, i don't see anything wrong in that. she is the FL of the show for god sake. whats wrong with wanting to see her in IV? 🤣

As far as question - why not take Ayesha's interview.. may be she's a reserved person or takes time to go through her scripts - she's one of the character with the most no.of dialogues in the show. This is her first show as a lead as well, reasons could be numerous - why not you pose the same question to the lady herself or the channel who shoot it, may be they will get you answer right off.

ek interview, or 2 interview or 3 interview ke times pe samaj aata hai, most of the times ayesha is missing in the frame during IVs. and even other shows ke leads do work on sets most of the female-oriented shows where females talk for more than 15 mins in the show also does interviews. i can't but this reason and this reason u mentioned is also just an assumption.

And these IV's are only for people who are obsessed with the show, if you do not like the crew coming & justifying their roles - you have a much easier option, change the channel or turn it off, no one's forcing you to watch them.. I can go on naming shows, where actors have even tried to defend their venomous roles.

i don't give a damn if they go on justifying their roles, i don't like them blaming it on sai all the time saying sai ko baath karne ka 'saleeka' nay hai and all. being a i fan i dont see anything wrong in putting forward my pov and what i want to see as its an open forum if u don't like my post u can ignore it rather than telling me what to do. i didnt mention anything in my post regarding taking actors off the job and all or anything offensive to anybody. what i mentioned was my opinion which is not even against forum rules.

replied in pink

No need of replacement

And neil...he is a seasoned actor and was professional..he is been in industry from late 2007..long time and he knows how it works

But other lady Aishwarya..i don't know..i never heard her name before and never saw her on TV or ad before...i saw many instances on SM..the unprofessional conduct was there from the actress..

But it's all business..the channel will never tolerate anything which reduce their profits...

I totally agree with you. I have stopped watching this unethical show which promote illegal relation. Apart from disgusting acting of the access playing patralekha the relation dynamics changed after off screen relevation between male lead and actress. And also all news media promoting a vamp and most likely because of that off screen rista. Although the show getting trp mostly because of overdose of bitching as Indian audience likes that but being a healthy viewer this is unacceptable. IPS officer ka nam pe kalank hai Virat Chavan, who is a spine less opportunistic person who "per ka upor and nich both wants. An high rank officer who failed to stand against wrong doing for his legal married wife. Which is shame. I would blame partially Kamal Josi too for creating this mess for his beloved daughter by giving sole responsibility to that officer. Anyway don't watch it so does not matter it. Only bad thing is that I liked Sai as a character and as an actress but this is not a likable or watchable show anymore.

Did not mean to hurt anyone just wrote what I feel.

Originally posted by: Chandu_500

replied in pink

as I stated earlier, I have no objections with your POV & respect it. I've just shared mine - a common viewer, who doesn't give a damn about off-screen drama & IV's. I never asked you to stop sharing your comments, I was just being blunt - to quote one of Indian TV's leading writer, when he was criticized for characterization in the show, his reply to the fans was - "Dekhna hai toh dekho".

Actors shared their POV because they were asked & there are numerous shows, where the actor's POV was way off the mark from the actual characters' POV, which swings from one extreme to the other like a pendulum. Still, I don't care about what the actors POV is of their character from an IV. I can make up my own mind, if they fail to show it through the episode. In short - Actor's POV doesn't matter for me, character's does !

I can name at least 3 other shows that I've heard about - where both the leads wouldn't even come on screen for a single IV together - at least you've a show where at least 2 of the 3 leads share the screen space & rarely the leading lady does as well & they bode well as well by the looks of it.

Anyways, I'm done with the debate & this will only go-in-cirlces now.

Originally posted by: basherz

as I stated earlier, I have no objections with your POV & respect it. I've just shared mine - a common viewer, who doesn't give a damn about off-screen drama & IV's. I never asked you to stop sharing your comments, I was just being blunt - to quote one of Indian TV's leading writer, when he was criticized for characterization in the show, his reply to the fans was - "Dekhna hai toh dekho".

Actors shared their POV because they were asked & there are numerous shows, where the actor's POV was way off the mark from the actual characters' POV, which swings from one extreme to the other like a pendulum. Still, I don't care about what the actors POV is of their character from an IV. I can make up my own mind, if they fail to show it through the episode. In short - Actor's POV doesn't matter for me, character's does !

I can name at least 3 other shows that I've heard about - where both the leads wouldn't even come on screen for a single IV together - at least you've a show where at least 2 of the 3 leads share the screen space & rarely the leading lady does as well & they bode well as well by the looks of it.

Anyways, I'm done with the debate & this will only go-in-cirlces now.

Whatever your pov is i would have respected it if u said normally like i did and been a little more polite with your words. instead u quoted my post and questioned my pov, i replied to u in the same tone and same way.

U didn't ask me to not share my posts but u did mention saying turn off ur TV or change the channel if u are not interested to watch. So i replied to that as well saying u don't need to tell me what to do. When u quote someone's post and say things it means that u are intending it to that specific person.

Aap jaise kisi se baath karte hai tho aapko reply bhi waise hi milegi. Just like sai says in the show 😆

The way u framed the words needed to be more politely put in order to receive a an equally calm and politely reply from me.

It was like u were shooting questions and ur opinions at me, which made me think ki 'main ne ithna bhi kya galat comment kardi' 😂😂 that is why i mentioned ki i didn't say anything abusive to any actors in my post nor i said anything about taking them off the job, or i didn't say anything that was against the firum rules. so i replied the same way. Even am not in for a debate.

All i said in my post was i want to see ayesha in the IV too, as it's triangle love story and she is also the lead. As a fan i don't see anything wrong in expecting that.

Yes i agree that few actors maynot find time for all this. But it is just ur assumption, u don't know if she is really busy or what the exact problem is. So that's what i said in the reply.

I do understand that people have different opinions and POV's when u want to share urs with general forum members u can separately post it. If u are quoting someone's post u should be ready to take their reply, opinions and feedback to ur post too, so that's what i did in my previous post. Replied to what u said, for each para/opinion of urs.

Originally posted by: Chandu_500

Whatever your pov is i would have respected it if u said normally like i did and been a little more polite with your words. instead u quoted my post and questioned my pov, i replied to u in the same tone and same way.

U didn't ask me to not share my posts but u did mention saying turn off ur TV or change the channel if u are not interested to watch. So i replied to that as well saying u don't need to tell me what to do. When u quote someone's post and say things it means that u are intending it to that specific person.

Aap jaise kisi se baath karte hai tho aapko reply bhi waise hi milegi. Just like sai says in the show 😆

The way u framed the words needed to be more politely put in order to receive a an equally calm and politely reply from me.

It was like u were shooting questions and ur opinions at me, which made me think ki 'main ne ithna bhi kya galat comment kardi' 😂😂 that is why i mentioned ki i didn't say anything abusive to any actors in my post nor i said anything about taking them off the job, or i didn't say anything that was against the firum rules. so i replied the same way. Even am not in for a debate.

All i said in my post was i want to see ayesha in the IV too, as it's triangle love story and she is also the lead. As a fan i don't see anything wrong in expecting that.

Yes i agree that few actors maynot find time for all this. But it is just ur assumption, u don't know if she is really busy or what the exact problem is. So that's what i said in the reply.

I do understand that people have different opinions and POV's when u want to share urs with general forum members u can separately post it. If u are quoting someone's post u should be ready to take their reply, opinions and feedback to ur post too, so that's what i did in my previous post. Replied to what u said, for each para/opinion of urs.

I don't care about the tone of your reply, it hardly matters to me. I just said what I'd to say, I don't like to sugarcoat stuff. I'll be blunt with my POV. People always have a different way of conveying their POV, if I start get offending for every little thing, its hard to live in the present day.

Having hopes to catch a glimpse of other actor's IV is not at all bad but to call it wrong & etc bcoz the other lady doesn't appear in IV's... is wrong but not a heinous crime in my book - its like as if the other actors have conspired to post IV without the other lady's knowledge, again that's a POV.

I'm strict believer of the great Indian writer "Dekhna hai toh dekho" concept, which is why I said - if you don't like it - switch off the tv, its a generic response to anyone who've issues - not exclusively dedicated to you 😛

Just wanted to clear the air, as you seemed to get into a wrong assumption that I was offended by your tone. Anyways, I'm again done with this debate 😆

yes , its better to replace pakkhis character with some other actress...neil replace will be bit odd , coz chemistry between sai and virat is made already..

Nothing against aiswarya but this year neil and aiswarya are getting married and this may definitely hinder sairat romance, when they are working on same set.....it will be odd to execute romantic scenes...

I think this is the reason neil and aiswarya announced engagement very soon....

Thats why very less romance between leads....

Originally posted by: akniti

yes , its better to replace pakkhis character with some other actress...neil replace will be bit odd , coz chemistry between sai and virat is made already..

Nothing against aiswarya but this year neil and aiswarya are getting married and this may definitely hinder sairat romance, when they are working on same set.....it will be odd to execute romantic scenes...

I think this is the reason neil and aiswarya announced engagement very soon....

Thats why very less romance between leads....

Haan tatz the reason I started off with this topic, see the bold one

Regards

Aarthi

Let's just ignore the BTS. If Ayesha was not there before, it's going to get worse because of her injury. She cannot walk to different places giving interviews maybe for a long time. Her priority must be the shooting for the show, and rightly so.

Now about the other two, my POV..

The other day we saw the fight BTS? Two actors spoke about it, blamed Sai...saleekha etc. But today what was the episode about? It was such a powerful scene. And though we might find nuances in the characters, that both were wrong, it only leads to Sairat gaining more of an understanding between them.

So what the actors spoke was completely off the mark. They are the ones who come out looking a bit silly, in fact.

Yesterday both Neil and Ayesha put up a Star promo which said will Virat find his way to Sai's heart?

The channel must've asked them to do it. All polls Sairat is winning. There's no way the PH and channel is unaware of all this.

At the most, we might have to put up with extra terrace scenes 🤪

Honestly, we should not even comment henceforth on these vague interviews.