what does an ideal woman mean? - Page 2

Originally posted by: geet.a

I understand your POV :))

But Geet was not to be an ideal woman- she was to be an inspiring one.

After breaking bonds with her past, she put teeka on dev's forehead as a wife would to her hubby's brother.

If she's to live in the same house as him, she needs to make him aware she has no grudges with the past..

I would have said they looked like bhabhi-devar..:)

nothing else..and while we all may hate dev, and yes i do too and there are v few things i would like more than seeing dev turn negative or be kicked by Maan...and slapped by Geet.. the point is that she has forgiven him..

She cannot take it back..lol..and it will be some time before maan and all of us come to terms with that..

She wasn't being a devi when she forgave him..she just is tired of holding on..

the putting colour part- i would have loved a maneet holi but dev is a khurana- maan himself has said so, and as a part of that household, as a part of that family and by virtue of being maan's brother, geet is simply moving on- into her role as a wife..

As a woman, she took the decision of forgiving, now she's creating a new life with maan's family..

I guess i'm not very convincing and yes, it took me some time to come to terms with it..but i don't think her character is completely butchered :)

CV's- well the execution has been pretty awful for what they wanted to portray so let the cv-bashing continue..LOL

Originally posted by: ria_sengupta

why geet has to be ideal?

well, i never said that geet has to be ideal, the cvs said that.so its better u ask this question to the cvs.

making mistakes is something else,but allowing dev to put colour on her and putting tika-is not just a small mistake unknowingly done!

u say she has not been shown happily playing holi with dev-well perhaps u missed the smile on her face when dev put the colour on her face and again when she put the tika on his forehead.if it was a formality, her facial expressions would have been different.

lastly, Lord Ram and Sita were in a totally different context, Lord Ram knew Sita was innocent, but he had to do it as a King. i will not go into all that now, as i feel this example is not at all applicable in this case.

Originally posted by: AnuN

Lord Ram being a King should have set the right example for others.. pls dont contradict yourself.. like you said, he knew Sita was innocent, then he should have made this loud and clear that she doesnot have to suffer for being a woman.. I mean why a woman has to prove her innocence.. why her words dont carry any weight.. Why this male dominance.. It was such a big mistake and you think it was ok.. in fact, its said, its the only time where maryada purshottam could not stay true to this name.

Originally posted by: ria_sengupta

all right once and for all........................ when hv i contradicted myself? did i say that what happened with Sitaji was right?? I am a woman-i know what is right and what is wrong. just to inform u, my mom and i hv been watching Ramayan recently again, and everytime during thate agnipariksha and patal pravesh,we r unable to stop our tears! i said that Lord Ram knew Sita was innocent, did not say what he did ws right! i just wanted to keep that example out of here becoz firstly, to me is is not in the least applicable to geet's case and secondly, Lord Ram is a Religious figure and i do not want to tread into that ground becoz unknowingly and unintentionally, people might get hurt. have i made myself clear?please do not give religious examples becoz u never know whom u might end up hurting.

Originally posted by: Rituparnaa

Ria very well put ...........the precap was the last straw of demeaning the definition of justice........Well even if Dev is forgiven but I must say the way of forgiving was not acceptable for me at least.......forgiving is defintely a noble act and very much makes a human more nobler as Maan did so many times in his life but it always takes time to forgive what Dev did here.I think CVs failed miserably in putting that.

Secondly yes the precap was hinting as if everything is well between Dev n Geet b4 also.They acted so friendly there.......sorry who find it ok but as u said I could not accept it at all.So here Maan's outburst will be very much justified.But what am afraid is though he'll be very much justified in bursting out his anger but again he has to apologise to his lady love in coming epis again.Maan Singh Khurana the man of principle ,is paying so much loving unconditionally always.

Originally posted by: Rituparnaa

Ria very well put ...........the precap was the last straw of demeaning the definition of justice........Well even if Dev is forgiven but I must say the way of forgiving was not acceptable for me at least.......forgiving is defintely a noble act and very much makes a human more nobler as Maan did so many times in his life but it always takes time to forgive what Dev did here.I think CVs failed miserably in putting that.

Secondly yes the precap was hinting as if everything is well between Dev n Geet b4 also.They acted so friendly there.......sorry who find it ok but as u said I could not accept it at all.So here Maan's outburst will be very much justified.But what am afraid is though he'll be very much justified in bursting out his anger but again he has to apologise to his lady love in coming epis again.Maan Singh Khurana the man of principle ,is paying so much loving unconditionally always.

Originally posted by: jwalamukhi

The perfect example of ideal woman was geet in hoshiarpur who did her duties well
1. as a daughter she obeyed her parents and agreed for marraige
2. as a wife she kept full trust on her husband although he cheated her
3. as a mother she fought with the world for her child
4. as a woman she stood against honour killing
5. Kshamayadarithri- she proved that by forgiving dev

but behaving friendly against her husband's will ....................no not at all acceptable.........She is not the same geet anymore which i had so much respect and admiration😒