Is Maan innocent? Me thinks Maybe NO! - Page 76

Yasu...as a woman...having a healthy "baking" life does not make one loose. That is the beauty of being adults...we get that choice. 😊

Originally posted by: yasu09

but often they are linked....

even his dadi opposes loose women...

so that may have rubbed of on him...

he obviously understands that to a women their izzat is everything...

so for that reason although he has no probz expressing his libido through foreplay...

he won't go all the way......

i guess the only way we will find out if Maan has ever gone all the way, is when Sameera enters the show....

Yaz izzat is subjective .... it depends from person to person ... i mean he would always turn his eyes away whenever Geet's dupatta went awry bcos he knew someone from her background would be uncomfortable bt did u ever see him not look sasha tasha in the eye or whatever? everyone's definition of izzat is different and if sameera felt that physical relationships dont definite honor and respectability that MSK wd have had no problems with that..... he did let geet define the relation between them so he may well ve allowed Sameera the same freedom ...

Maan's own definition of izzat may well be different .. for him it may be okay to have relationship as long as u dont use them and throw them away like a kleenax ...


okay final bye 🤗

Originally posted by: darlunia

Yasu...as a woman...having a healthy "baking" life does not make one loose. That is the beauty of being adults...we get that choice. 😊

I ain't saying that from a personal viewpoint hun...

@Yasu-

Originally posted by: Arwen...

Yaz izzat is subjective .... it depends from person to person ... i mean he would always turn his eyes away whenever Geet's dupatta went awry bcos he knew someone from her background would be uncomfortable bt did u ever see him not look sasha tasha in the eye or whatever? everyone's definition of izzat is different and if sameera felt that physical relationships dont definite honor and respectability that MSK wd have had no problems with that..... he did let geet define the relation between them so he may well ve allowed Sameera the same freedom ...

Maan's own definition of izzat may well be different .. for him it may be okay to have relationship as long as u dont use them and throw them away like a kleenax ...


okay final bye 🤗

Originally posted by: beagleboy

@Yasu-

Maan was an innocent

Virginal in white

Until aunty Sam came to be by his side

and the temptation for SIN was too much to hide

He rushed out of the closet

And pinned her down

And in her arms he drowned, drowned, DROWNED😆

Vidyaaaaaaaaaa....love it...🤗

Originally posted by: cacoethes

Yasu: Maan would never do anything if the woman did not consent...plus having a physical relation with a person u "think" u love does not make one loose!

Originally posted by: Arwen...

Yaz izzat is subjective .... it depends from person to person ... i mean he would always turn his eyes away whenever Geet's dupatta went awry bcos he knew someone from her background would be uncomfortable bt did u ever see him not look sasha tasha in the eye or whatever? everyone's definition of izzat is different and if sameera felt that physical relationships dont definite honor and respectability that MSK wd have had no problems with that..... he did let geet define the relation between them so he may well ve allowed Sameera the same freedom ...

Maan's own definition of izzat may well be different .. for him it may be okay to have relationship as long as u dont use them and throw them away like a kleenax ...


okay final bye 🤗