Originally posted by: maybe-just
</font>
</div>[size=2]</font>
<div>
[DIV][STRONG]<font size="2">If they did think like that, then whoa that's deep thinking but yes the "Good" part is that CVs cant take the credit for it 😆I still find it hard to believe because some of their episodes do tend be be out of balance one can say, but like you said CVs might not have thought it your way! Im in a bit of a confusion regarding what they were trying to show because in that scene the bangle breaking was emphasized however what they were trying to show and our interpretation will probably be different! 🤔I'd be really surprised if someone rightly guessedtheir purpose of showing a certain thing! </font>
[DIV][STRONG]<font size="2">BTW are you hating on Mr.Nissar these days? 😆😆😳</font>
Actually Faz, Lana's theory can be easily interpreted as in India when a first marriage needs to be broken then they break the bangles,; hence it is justifiable for Maan to break the bangles...it is very common thing...basically in punjabi culture...you can see these in old movies...
yeah I wish they clear out the air by somehow letting us know the exact purpose for that scene...
and Mr. Director, no am not angry but indifferent ... just that he doesn't correct himself at all even if I point out the mistakes...kutte ka dum kabhi sidha nehin hota naa??? tedhi rahegi humesha...
710