24/1/2018
After so many days I liked today's episode. The key things being Satrupa has enraged a father. Adhi tells he knows law will win. He wants justice to be delivered in court. I also want justice to delivered in court the kurushetra of modern world. Anything outside that place is not the right way.
But as time goes by Adhi will understand one thing, to establish dharma in the kurushetra, adharma has to happen outside kurushetra to create proofs that establish the truth.
Court doesnt go by feelings. If Adhi says Anami had threat from LM court will ask him proofs for that. Life threat to Ladoo is not enough, life threat to Anami has to be proven. Now how will you create proofs unless you use trickery to get it from the people itself who have erased it. Yes adharma has to happen. With the very same law this family misuses for its power, with the same law they have to be undone. That is how you break the Chakravyuha.
Satrupa is happy.Yes she has the power of the system, but she doesnt know the level at which Anami is attached to Adhi. She can create a physical barrier for her daughter, but the emotional closeness will find a way to break that barrier. Now itself Anami has gone to meet Adhi, Sat doesnt know that. Infact she doesnt know what her family is doing behind her back while she thinks they are in her control.
The Pandey family is tied with the bond of love, like good families. They will stand together. It's the second time calamity is coming their way. A heir of LM trapped Dheeru, now again because of another heir his son is in trouble. Dheeru wont take it sitting, neither would Anami. He will make Anami stand against the whole LM if she says she truly care for Adhi. This is going to be the most interesting aspect of Chakravyuha.
I love the way LMwasis play chess and Pandey family was shown playing carroms. Reason in chess it is always about other, while in carroms it is about you. Do you know how. In Chess every player can move only in a certain way, so looking in the position of the pawns in the board you can assess to a great extend how they will move. In carroms the moment you get the striker you decide which pawn and direct the striker towards it. It doesnt matter the pawn is in front, back or side you are free to use the striker the way you want inline with the rules. When a chess player meets a chess player a good chess player wins because it is theory of reaction. But if a chess player meets a carrom player chess player is clueless as they dont know what is the carroms players target at that particular point of time. Then chess player makes mistakes and loses the game. For us also is it about others or is it about you. Are you a chess player or carrom player. Chess player lives in past or future. Carrom player in present.
252