OS: Because you don't have a character Khushi... - Page 6

Originally posted by: charlotte74

Hey Rima,

You write beautifully as always. But I don't believe Arnav called her characterless because she was in the arms of another man hence doubting her fidelity. I think it was because she was in the arms of Shyam --- a man married to his beloved sister. There is a difference.

We have to remember that love had not been established between the two at this point ie; neither had confessed to the other. It was still in a "budding" stage. You know how things can be corrupted at a budding stage.

Later on after they were married thier "mature" love went through hurdles like Sheetal where Khushi stood by him inspite of doubts and Arnav stood by Khushi when she wanted to pariticipate in the Mrs India contest.

Coming back to when their love was still in a nacent stage ---

When Khushi explained about Shyam and Arnav did not believe her she had two choices

--Stay back and prove to him that she was innocent

--Leave him to figure it out for himself

She took the first one without even realizing why exactly. After Arnav was kidnapped she finally realized that she taken all the trouble only because she loved him immensely. It takes a strong woman to do what she did. And she stands vidicated because she proved him wrong.NOW THE LOVE HAS GONE FROM BUD TO A FLOWER STAGE AND THIS IS WHEN HE NEEDS TO BEG HER FORGIVENESS.

If she had taken the second option then after Arnav comes to know of her innocence he would be the one to go after her to prove that he truly loves her. AGAIN THE LOVE WILL PROGRESS FROM BUD TO A FLOWER STAGE AND THIS IS WHEN SHE WOULD FORGIVE HIM AND COME BACK TO HIM.

Redemption from Arnav's side should have been established in either case but the fault lies in the writing.

too good 👏

Originally posted by: rima

agree love was not confessed

but did Arnav even know Khushi the woman that he suspected her of such a henious crime?

If he did not then was it love or just attraction?

Moreover the whole idea of she giving 'proof' is crass

not in this day and age

I am sick and tired f our mythological stories emphasising only the woman shud be virtuous

men have to be virtuous too

I have excused Arnav many things

but not the characterless dialogue

because a woman's virtue

is not a thing that can ever be 'proven'

Originally posted by: charlotte74

Again ... love was in the nascent stage ie; progressed from an attraction to a stage where he cared enough to be shaken when he thought she might have died in that accident.

But love was not mature enough to withstand the following.

He heard her saying "Chod di jiye anjaliji ko" right after the hug. He believed they were having an affair.

This henious crime happened at a very crucial juncture of his sister's pregnancy. He had to act fast.

In his view a woman who is having an affair with a married man does not have "character"

Khushi had a choice not to prove anything to him. She could have walked away from Arnav when he refused to believe her side of the story but she did not.

Again I repeat that Arnav was not suspecting Khushi's virtue but he definitely suspected her character of being a home wrecker.

Do you think he would have called her characterless if he had seen her hugging NK instead?

If he had done that then I agree that it is very chauvinistic of him to expect her to be "pure" when he himself wanted to live-in with a woman.

Originally posted by: rima

to me the fact that he believed wat he saw iteelf is wrong

the fact that he hid his reasons for marrying her is wrong

the fact that whatever be the reasons he dragged her to get married by orce is wrong

the fact that he did not investigate by himself is wrong

and most importantly

THE FACT THAT HE COULD EVEN BELIVE WHAT HE SAW AND BELIEVE KHUSHI CAPABLE OF SUCH A THING IS WRONG

and worst

the fact that he did not believe her even after what she told him is very very wrong

Khushi ad no choice because he did not give her any

that's how it is in our country from ancient times

woman has no choice but to give 'proofs'

sorry Kavi

this is a concept i can go on and on about

from mythology to today we are wrong

Sometimes I wonder that in case of women, most of the times they are not the deciding authorities of their lives. Decisions are forced upon them by society, their elders,husbands,boyfriends and if anything goes wrong with those decisions the lady suffers and it is considered imperative on her part to explain the consequence of that decision.

wow now this is what we so needed
you are so right why should she prove her innocence
and her character being intact and not his
i can never get why only women should prove their purity why not when men do the same
why should we forgive them when we know had something what they did we do we wont be forgiven
that was needed for him to prove that he can be faithful to her
that he wouldnt mistrust her and earn the love respect from her
good he did what she asked him to do or she would have left him
no one should accuse anyone of such bad thing without solid proof

if only the story had gone this way...!!!!

Beautiful 👏