2.)That which Must not to be commented.
This is written on the basis of my knowledge and belief that not all of us are 9 year old and can accept where we went wrong and be more diligent.
(those who think my references to anything HP is out of love , you're correct and who think its out of spite your horribly correct!)
As you can see from the title I'd like to talk about all that we should comment but know that it wont last forever.
Commenting is like giving a speech or writing an essay , however small it is.
We use adjectives , verbs and if the comment starts getting long(read:speeches) we input quotes , references and experiences too.
Now a lot of Writers use pictures of the same couple they are writing about, in a chapter so as to give the reader the visual feed their mind needs while reading.
Following their writer , the reader takes a visual journey of their own and posts a pic which they feel is relating to the chapter.
For example , the last thing I read , Zehra's(😳) new chapter for "Make Me Love", made me visualize a scene from the film "A beautiful Mind" and it is quite relevant in "looks" to the chapter , but its very different to the situation.
Now some else following this , posts a relevant in "looks/feel" picture and this goes on to a point where we all chance upon a movie and posts the pics of that only , like Superman standing in the rain , flying up , talking to his GF , etc.
Then we start to discuss the looks/feel of the
picture and
not the relevance of the picture to the story.
That is spamming. I maybe friends with the writer and she may find it funny but will all other readers who may not be friends to the writer , may seriously be offended by the space wasted where
they could have posted a valuable comment..?
I believe that I will feel offended by that spamming.a)To keep a thread fun , its the writers duty to initiate a discussion with reference to the story.
b)Only funny looking stuff could be fun is no rule. Fun could be pulled out from a healthy and to the point discussion , which can have pictures too.
If we did that spamming we should accept it and not bend the rules by saying we are offended by being pointed out and that "its an open forum" + blahs blahs...
Belonging mostly to Democratic countries I accept that we believe we have all the rights to be right even when we are wrong. But the moment we are wrong we start with democratic thoughts of "my opinions , my rights , my mind , my confetti" , which is where we should actually be thinking of "The Greater Good".
The above example also applies to the posting of videos/songs/quotes. Relevancy is the need of the hour.
Also the testimonial comments about wanting an update/waiting for one/congratulating for something that is told by the writer/a new thread/note about absence/reasons , and response to those posts by writers which say"posting in an hour/XYZ ,
are part of a reader-writer relationship which should be permitted but limited to be done "once".In that once we can post however and whatever we readers want(pic , etc.)
Because what if the writer is in a tight spot and our constant "update!!!" screams irritate them or being eager steal the space for a comment by our constant "my spot/your updating?" , just after a
res by the writer and we don't even comment further at that spot...?
Here I'd also like to mention that the time gap between two updates is what creates a havoc in us ,the readers and most of the spamming cases happen hence.
Now if I say that
"make a rule that writers put up a "certain" discussion about the story which carries till the next update" so that we can legitimate the discussion that is not part of spamming , then the chances of a "comment" getting lost in this "discussion" is also possible because there are so many readers , and discussions can take real high forms.
But not allowing anything further than the comment is also like schooling the creativity of Writer-Reader relationship , which limits the evolution of a story or of that which hasn't happened.
To sum up the above part I'd like to say , when we buy a book and read it to the end/chapter per chapter , we write our comments/reviews in the spaces after each chapter/book ends(i do).
That is also to say , we make those comments/reviews in our mind and its a soliloquy between us and the book.
But when we want to discuss/dissect the story or entertain/prod the writer , we don't pen down these attributes in the book and mail it to the writer , nor do we mail ourselves as most things are in our mind.
See , comments/reviews are always on the back of the book(a place where the story is) correct...?They deal with the story of the book.
But proportions/discussions/relevancy/testimonials/appreciations , etc., are posted to the writer in letters/on blogs/fan clubs.
So if we are asked to comment on the thread(a place where the story is) and take our proportions/discussions/relevancy/testimonials/appreciations , etc., to scraps/pms and if someone finds this invasion of personal space , then take it to chat clubs and fan clubs , which actually we have a place to make them , then why are we so opposed to do things in a correct order?PS_ Again , if you read this through , no offense to the DT or anyone who agrees or disagrees.
These are my views(remember Democracy).
Edited by 18shabbo - 11 years ago
708