Originally posted by: kaboo123
Does debate always have to centre around attacking a particular contestant on personal dislike almost iteratively. We have understood that people here hate Arpita passionatley. What I am saying that the intensity with which the emotion is exhibited can be diluted to respect the sentiments of others. .
Debate does not always have to centre around 'attacking' a particular contestant - it does however centre around dissecting character traits and observations made on a character and discussing them.
I do agree with you in regards to people who post childish and extremely crude remarks, for example wishing death on a contestant or making crude remarks about their physical appearance etc.
Originally posted by: kaboo123
Besides, how does a contestant care whether u like them or don't like them. If the contestants are not bothered why does every second post of yours has to say I dislike Arpita or I hate Arpita. I like Arpita but do I ever say that I dislike Qazi regardless of whether I actually do like him or not.
That argument is completely baseless - if that was the case, than the creator of this forum should have enforced strict rules that go along the line of "These forums are for updates and reading only, do not comment on any of the contestants or you'll be banned" - I beleive we already have a read-only site at sify.com.
People will have their favourite contestants as well as their least favourite contestants and will definately discuss them both from both perspectives - positive & negative since they're provided a public forum to do so. If the creators of the forum don't want it, might as well shut the forum down and turn it into a news site - I mean using your argument - why should people post positive remarks and motivational remarks towards the contestants as well? I mean as you say: "how does a contestant care whether u like them or don't like them. "
Originally posted by: kaboo123
If u think I am a hypocrite then what does ur post suggest..
It's hypocritical because on one hand you say debate and on the other hand you say don't post negative remarks. Again, how can a debate exist if both sides of the argument are not involved?
It sounds like you're implying "Post only positive things or don't post at all" - that's not what you call debating.