Legality of bigamy! - Page 2

Originally posted by: raj1992

Bertie, they are his official fc's, if they do such things, it will obviously effect him, as he's directly associated with them..

They should talk to him before doing any trend or before taking some other decisions, It's Sid's fc n these are just admins, their behaviour may effect Sid, and Lady N, no comments abt that lady, if she had brain she wouldn't sit n bash people, instead would concentrate on the script to get trps

My point too...they unnecessarily got Sid into a situation and allowed Lady N to publicly drag him into the picture..I ended up giving it back to her and shutting her up...

FCs should not get involved in these efforts as a rule...it will reflect on the actors and unnecessarily spoil their equations with the channel, PH and even co-stars.

Originally posted by: BertieWooster

The issue here is not whether bigamy was legal or illegal during the time period in which the show was set.

It is about how bigamy is unacceptable on this show.

Obviously nobody is a fool here. Nobody protested against Akbar's harem or Dasarath having three or more wives. That was the norm of that period and it was part of history.

In this show, Rana Indravadhan Singh has already declared that he does not believe in bigamy or polygamy. He was not even willing to accept living under the same roof as fake Sulakshana, who he thought was his first wife returned from the dead. He wanted to remain a husband to Gayatri and Gayatri alone.

To justify bigamy on this show on the grounds of period is a big joke under the circumstances.

It does not matter whether it was legal or not!

What matters is that this is the love story of Rana Indravdhan SIngh and Gayatri Devi and that is how it should remain. Bringing co-wives dilutes the very core of this story and hence is not acceptable.

Bertie, you mark my words, it will not end here.The Lady N will show a hot SR btw vamp and RNJ, i have a feeling it will get even more dirty with more skinshow, vulgarity n seduction..

Hey guys!

Originally posted by: BertieWooster

The issue here is not whether bigamy was legal or illegal during the time period in which the show was set.

It is about how bigamy is unacceptable on this show.

Obviously nobody is a fool here. Nobody protested against Akbar's harem or Dasarath having three or more wives. That was the norm of that period and it was part of history.

In this show, Rana Indravadhan Singh has already declared that he does not believe in bigamy or polygamy. He was not even willing to accept living under the same roof as fake Sulakshana, who he thought was his first wife returned from the dead. He wanted to remain a husband to Gayatri and Gayatri alone.

To justify bigamy on this show on the grounds of period is a big joke under the circumstances.

It does not matter whether it was legal or not!

What matters is that this is the love story of Rana Indravdhan SIngh and Gayatri Devi and that is how it should remain. Bringing co-wives dilutes the very core of this story and hence is not acceptable.

exactly !! we r not concerned with whether it is illegal or not ,we pretty much know that it was legal that time.but the thing is we didnt sign up for this!!! we wanted a nice love story b/w a commoner nd a king. after seeing it now no one can say its a love story that too royal!!! here only they r showing that how a vamp wins nd her plotting... the leads dont even get much screen space.
nd guys i appreciate ur efforts 👏 let them feel the heat!!

Guys wait and watch.

Berts, posting part of my response to Raj


The period of this show is not a reason for bigamy,it's just an excuse to propagate channel's
medieval values.

I'm surprised people can even swallow this track w.o realizing how it had derailed the main story and destroyed all the characters, including their own favourites, whoever they are.

I don't care whether polygamy was the norm back then or whether both men and women were having many partners and lived happily/ unhappily in a commune.

This show was sold to me as " Ek Tha Raja Ek Thi Rani" and any TDH shoved at me as Raja or Rani & getting paired with the original Raja and Rani are unacceptable.

@chennaigirl Most of us have left, we just keep ranting in the forum n keep updates of how the show is butchered mercilessely.. N most of us matured n we dont watch the show jst bcoz our fav is in the show. If my fav wants me to watch their shw, they have to come with good content show, i m not going to watch it jst bcoz my fav is in the show..

Originally posted by: simran_singh_24

Berts, posting part of my response to Raj


The period of this show is not a reason for bigamy,it's just an excuse to propagate channel's
medieval values.

I'm surprised people can even swallow this track w.o realizing how it had derailed the main story and destroyed all the characters, including their own favourites, whoever they are.

I don't care whether polygamy was the norm back then or whether both men and women were having many partners and lived happily/ unhappily in a commune.

This show was sold to me as " Ek Tha Raja Ek Thi Rani" and any TDH shoved at me as Raja or Rani & getting paired with the original Raja and Rani are unacceptable.

Bang on Sim..!

I am sorry but any attempt being made to justify bigamy on this show on the grounds of time period is both weak and futile...

The argument here is not about the legality..it is about how it conforms with the show's theme and how it was sold to us..!

This is a case of deceptive advertisting at its worst!

True. There's a morality that they have to stick to.

Rightly said Berts.. the point is not Bigamy was allowed.. n chalata tha types in 1940's era.. But the point is that.. we don't want to see any TDH for any of the leads.. can't peeps understand this simple thing that they come with all laws n all? from any fan grp.. I just don't care abt specific fan grp.. If U have right to think chalta hain as of now.. then we have right to think... not so chalega.. we will protest.. 😈