Created

Last reply

Replies

20

Views

1.8k

Users

6

Likes

49

Frequent Posters

mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#11
Vrish,
Perfectly written. To add to this even Draupadi was not normally born, her vastraharan played a major role in initiatiating this war.
All the Kauravas's birth is processed one.
Edited by mnx12 - 13 years ago
Krinya thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 13 years ago
#12
really ! it's too confusing..what we get and do not get is decided by the karmas of previous birth...if a person was really bad in his prev. birth and in the current janam , his destiny is written that way, then he will fall in the vicious circle of bad , will he ever find a way to come out? it's written in bhagwat Geeta that only way to get out is "prabhu bhakti"..fine, but how will he get the akal to do that? what is it that stops him? the prev. birth karma? 😆 one more thing, how does God decide which karma is good and which is bad? there is 7 billion population and each one will do diff. karma ...
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#13
God has given that department to planets to organise, decide course of action in an individual's life. As per the past birth's karma's a person is born at the time best suitable to enjoy, suffer, create, destroy things in his life. When krishna was born, most of the planets were either exaulted position or were in their own house, indicating an exceptional personality & life.
Karmas are of different types. What a person does in his day to day life is his normal karmas, many just carry on with this through out their life. At times to achieve a big goal, many people with commen interest gets together, performs their role, final outcome depends on their combined efforts. Here 1 big Krama connects many people.This is predestined, such people are born when a suitable time comes, which will provide them an opportunity to accomlish that task. To have an exceptional luck, one requires to perform exceptional karmas, good or bad that depends completely on his thought process, circumstances.This applies to every one.
Edited by mnx12 - 13 years ago
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: .Vrish.


The other major score I can think of is Drupada's, who begat Dhristadyumna in order to kill Drona. Was a pretty lame yagna, I must say, in that in the past, whenever someone was born for the sake of killing somebody, that someone was way superior in battle to the target - whether it was Rama against Ravana, Kartikeya against Surapadman & Taraka, Ayappan against Mahishi, Parashurama against Kartavirya Sahasrabahu, and so on. But in this case, Dhristadyumna was vastly inferior to Drona in battle, and had to be rescued by Bhima or Satyaki in every battle w/ Drona that he fought. Whoever granted Drupada his boon, what was the point of granting such a son who was no match for the top Kuru warriors - meaning Bheeshma, Drona, Ashwatthama, Kripa & Karna? Yeah, Dhristadyumna was superior to Duryodhan, but so was Drupada.

Anyway, this is all that I could think of @ the moment.



Vrish, that was really nice, just felt like adding, when draupadi came out, she was an extra, and a daibabani said she will be the cause of the downfall of the kurukul. More than Dhristadyumna killing drona, that was the real significant outcome of the yagna. Also when drona heard aswathama was dead, he went and sat into a meditation refusing to weild any weapon, no one among the pandava team were eager to kill him and face divine retributaion for killing a weaponless brahmin except Dhristadyumna who was mad enough to behead him. So he came useful at the right moment, much like shikhandi i guess. Shikhandi also wasnt anything significant and the way she/he was useful in destroying bheesma was by acting as arjun's shield.
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#15
Tan

Actually, when Drona cast aside his weapons and took his yogic position, his soul passed away, and that was observed by just 5 people - Yudhisthir, Krishna, Arjun, Kripa and Sanjaya. In other words, Drona was already dead when Dhrishtadyumna struck his lifeless body - in other words, even if he had never been born, at least in this department, the Pandavas' work would have been done. Ashwatthama too held the Pandavas, not just Dhrishtadyumna, responsible for Drona's death.

Which is why I think Drupada really got cheated in this yagna. Unlike other cases I mentioned above, he was totally worthless against the entire top tier of Kaurava warriors - Bheeshma, Drona, Kripa, Ashwatthama, Kritavarma. I've never understood why he, instead of Satyaki, was the senapari of the Pandava army.

After Drona, Drupada's next big grievance should have been against the Pandavas, who defeated him, not the Kauravas, who got defeated by him, and they should have been his #2 target for revenge, given his vindictive nature. However, his top objective for Draupadi was getting her married to the very Arjun who defeated him. But that only made him a vassal of the Pandavas, instead of the other way around.

Although given Drupada's lack of integrity - given how he betrayed Drona's friendship, maybe he deserved to get a half baked boon like the one he did. Indeed, the way Drupada treated Drona and the way Krishna treated Sudama was a major study in contrasts.
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#16
In Friday (Oct 28) episode, one of the things that Krishna told Satyabhama in response to the plot by Shakuni was that everybody's duration on earth is pre-determined by fate, and that Shakuni & Duryodhan were attempting to write the horoscope of others w/o realizing that their own end was being charted in that manner.

I know that Krishna was saying that he wasn't going to let adharm triumph over dharam. But the implication of his statement - that Shakuni & Duryodhan should do nothing didn't make sense to me. If Duryodhan wanted the throne, it made sense for him to try and get it, w/o leaving it simply to fate. Yeah, it was wrong of him to try to assassinate Yudhisthir, but aside from that, if he wanted something - in this case the Yuvraj position, he needed to try and get it. I agree that he should have recognized that as per protocols, he was next in line to Yudhisthir & Bhima, but other than that, Krishna seemed to be implying that he should simply have left it all to fate. But then one can say the same thing to the Pandavas as well, no?

I've always understood the fate argument to be a fallback argument after the results of any action are known. Like Duryodhan fighting Bhima and getting hit on his thigh - that was fate after the event, but not before. In other words, one makes the best attempts one can, and the results are what is divine will. But the way Krishna was emphasizing on that point while discussing Shakuni's conspiracy, it seemed that he was stating that Shakuni shouldn't even have acted, but just left it to divine will. This part I found tough to digest, even though I agree that Shakuni shouldn't have come up w/ this plot.
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#17
What Krishna said, applies to everyone. What he meant was Sh & Dy are trying to write Pandava's death but what will happen the very next moment in their own life is not known to them.
Certain part of fate is predestined & rest is left upto the person involved to change it through their own efforts, which we call Karmas & Krishna is the biggest promotor of Karmas. The result of most of those Karmas is not in our hand, that we get as per our fate. Most of our efforts are not predestined, that department is in our hand, believers of God, seeks help from that super power, so God helps them in their effort, here God feels responsible to the devotee, whose strength doubles & results are very good at times. Sh & Dy are scheming & mostly -ve power is too confident of their capability, even if they seek help from God for their wrong deeds, they actually don't get it. Before the MB war started both Dy & Ar went to Krishna, Dy chose to take his army & Ar wanted Krishna himself. End result is known to us. Whom to select compeletly depended on their thought process, future & efforts, which was in their fate.
Like Pandavas before the war asked for 5 villages, even Dy could have asked Dt to make him king of 1 state, then he would have expanded the borders as per his capabality, but he wanted to sit on the ready throne. Only efforts he put was to eliminate Pandava's at any cost. Fate is seen as a much bigger canvas, it is result of most of our karmas combined, what seems bad may turned out to be good in future. So Sh & Dy's efforts, karmas decided their fate.
Edited by mnx12 - 13 years ago
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#18
I think Markandeya's story is one of the greatest stories that illustrates that one can alter one's fate w/ one's karma. As one may know, Markandeya's parents were given a choice from Mahadev to have either a wise son who'd only live 16 years, or a foolish son who'd live long. They chose the former and Markandaya was born. When he was a few days from turning 16 and about to die, his mother told him about that destiny, so he went and started meditating on Mahadev. When Yamaraj came to him, he begged to be allowed to complete his puja, which Yama refused, but Mahadev intervened and Yamaraj backed off. After that, Markandeya, who wasn't supposed to live beyond then, was granted immortality by Mahadeva.

Some things are fate, but the bulk of it is guided by karma.
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#19

Markandeya, when he knew about his fate, started putting efforts to change it, by praying to Lord Shiva, his efforts in the right direction gave him perfect result.

Even Savitri, was able to get Satyawan back from Yamaraaj. So the efforts in right dirction creats or changes the fate. To achieve something by going out of the way, our efforts should be great too.
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#20
In today's episode, Krishna told Satyabhama that one of the reasons Paundrak hasn't been punished as yet is that his wife is pretty devoted to him, and when a woman is, her husband's longevity is extended.

But then this gives evil doers a loophole to have a really extended leash. Most famous example I can think of is Indrajit, whose wife was one of the most devoted wives in mythology. If wives had such power, then any evil doer can just get a really pure wife, and go on his rampage unhindered. In this case, the account of Paundrak's wife being a devotee is ahistorical - they could have shown her as a conniving queen, and they wouldn't have been wrong, since nothing is written about Paundrak's wife in SB.

In the Dwapar Yuga, except for Rukmini & Draupadi, there were hardly such pious wives that would cause their husbands lives to be extended. It's therefore somewhat anachronistic of Krishna to have given Satyabhama the explanation that he did.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".