Originally posted by: Soaps1
I did not imply anything I don't have time unlike you to comment on others i like sticking to what i like, no where in my post i even hinted or mentioned KB, she raised a question about harshad in a negative role ... and i commented on why I like HC in simpler roles compared to a negative one that is all, its my opinion negative characters do get extra support from script that did not at all mean the actors playing negative roles don't add their own shades or talent to the character ... you want to go ahead and find implications or assume things be my guest ... my experience tells me arguing with you is useless so won't even bother replying to the rest of your post .. think what you want as if it makes any difference
Please. That was not talking about Viraj/KVB? 🥱 Uhh... okay.
And anyway, that was not even the main point of my post. Funny how that's the only thing you and your friend can target. You said how negative characters have extra help from various things while Harshad never had that help. I'll not talk about Prem and Anurag since they are not related to the show. However, Raghav has gotten loads of "extra help".
You stated in your first post he didn't get any extra help such as Tapori language. But HC himself said he plays a Tapori character. So what if he doesn't use the language, playing a Tapori character in itself is extra help. Unless you want to say HC himself is wrong. You stated he didn't get any extra help such as "weird action". I'm sure you guys know this better than I do that Raghav is supposedly a "Dabangg" hero. He's had many action scenes and lots of "weird action" as well such as those flips in the air.
These are all extra help from the script. I used points and examples from your own post. Now tell me, did HC not have extra help to play Raghav?
Of course it is useless talking to someone who looks at only one small aspect of my post completely ignoring the main part and using that as her argument. 😊