Are The CVs Trying To Create Sympathy For Viraj??? - Page 13

Originally posted by: criticaleyes

The "Viraj" character is beyond redemption in real life. But as a character Viraj has the greatest potential in this show.

Jahnavi remembers almost nothing of Viraj's affection for her. The only memories she has of Viraj are the horrific things he did to her. So, sympathy for Viraj is out of question.

Still, I would like to believe that Viraj is NOT a Prem Chopra. He does not need a "goody goody hero" to counter him.
thats y no goody goody hero was brought!! sensible, strong intelligent man is bought to counter the evil!!
I don't understand why the character of Raghav was brought into the story, especially at this early stage.
u dont know?😲 u do watch this show ryt???
Viraj is a negative character, that goes without saying. But Raghav too is not perfect.

raghav is pure human and no super human, so tell me do perfect ppl exist??

He has his "slave" whom he treats badly. He too is prone to violence, and may very well cause physical harm (inadvertently), as in the scene where Jahnavi passes the wrong tool to him when he is under the car and can't see her.
🤣 u cracked the biggest joke of the century!! sorry cant control laughter!!
Viraj plans his tortures, Raghav too is seething with anger all the time and, in my opinion, not the safest guy to marry.

person without anger do exist??😲 😲😲

Raghav has also displayed cowardliness, as in when he refused to take the repeated calls from Unniyal and sped off on his bike.

attending spam calls are waste of time !!

Please don't get me wrong. Viraj as a husband is non-negotiable, but as a fictional character is immensely rich in possibilities. The story writers should refrain from having Viraj commit near murderous acts, unless they want to portray a psychopath.

u dont know viraj!

Raghav, again is not ideal husband material. He is unable to show affection, express his feelings, and is prone to violence and despotism. Also, he gets into trouble unnecessarily. All these characteristics will lead to too many ups and downs in a marriage.
u don't marry raghav! why u always pulling raghav to marriage!! its always best to marry a human than a psycho!!
Jahnavi is too weak, period.

Originally posted by: butterfly15..

I like the way he described them.
They have similar temperaments, as in they both get quite angry, and they do things in their own way to get the result they desire.
But just like how a coin has a fine line between boths sides, there is a fine line between Viraj and Raghav.
Raghav's beliefs are completely different to Viraj's. Viraj can easily hit people even women, and he only cares about what he wants, but Raghav is the opposite. So basically they use their powers for different things. Raghav uses his powers to get a good result for the sake of others whereas Viraj uses his power for his own needs.

I personally think they're trying to show that while both may have an aggressive nature, ultimately they're not the same. For this reason I don't think that Raghav could ever hurt Jhanvi. Even when he was about to hit Sundar it was in a comic way rather than a serious way. It differentiates the way Viraj is to the way Raghav is. Just like they are using Raghav's mum to show that just because someone is strict and a perfectionist like Viraj, it doesn't mean if you do something wrong they will abuse you physically or mentally.

And Sundar a slave?
Whoever said that is totally wrong. Keeping someone as a slave is not a small thing or a joke that the term should be thrown around so easily.
Sundar gives Raghav the respect of an older brother, that's why he listens to Raghav not because he is a slave. If he didn't want to do something it's obvious Raghav wouldn't make him do it, as that goes against his beliefs.
I respect my older brothers the same way Sundar does Raghav, and I usually listen to what they ask me to do, and yes when I tease them or anything like that, like Sundar does to Raghav they jokingly hit me, more like a pat lol😆 Does that mean I am their slave? Obviously not. It seems like in this modern age giving respect to others equates to slavery.

As for Viraj getting sympathy that's a personal choice i guess.
No matter what reason he gives for the way he treated Jhanvi, I wouldn't feel sympathy for him.
But if he did really forget everything and then found out how he really was, and he couldn't live with himself then maybe I would feel sorry for him, because he would finally realise how horrible he was to her. But I don't think he's forgotten anything. And I would never forgive him for the way he treated Jhanvi.

Originally posted by: butterfly15..

I like the way he described them.
They have similar temperaments, as in they both get quite angry, and they do things in their own way to get the result they desire.
But just like how a coin has a fine line between boths sides, there is a fine line between Viraj and Raghav.
Raghav's beliefs are completely different to Viraj's. Viraj can easily hit people even women, and he only cares about what he wants, but Raghav is the opposite. So basically they use their powers for different things. Raghav uses his powers to get a good result for the sake of others whereas Viraj uses his power for his own needs.

I personally think they're trying to show that while both may have an aggressive nature, ultimately they're not the same. For this reason I don't think that Raghav could ever hurt Jhanvi. Even when he was about to hit Sundar it was in a comic way rather than a serious way. It differentiates the way Viraj is to the way Raghav is. Just like they are using Raghav's mum to show that just because someone is strict and a perfectionist like Viraj, it doesn't mean if you do something wrong they will abuse you physically or mentally.

Originally posted by: butterfly15..

How comes everything always turns into Viraj vs Raghav?😆

Anyway carry on with your debate guys as it's good for the rankings😃

Originally posted by: ..Apz..

provocative comments by some ppl starts fight..its not like we all want to waste our tym convincing the same set of ppl🥱 tats y not even taking efforts to reply to some but dont act as if v r the ones who turned this to into fight zone..by trying to show tat ur comments sensible😵

Originally posted by: ..Apz..

provocative comments by some ppl starts fight..its not like we all want to waste our tym convincing the same set of ppl🥱 tats y not even taking efforts to reply to some but dont act as if v r the ones who turned this to into fight zone..by trying to show tat ur comments sensible😵

Originally posted by: ..Apz..

oh yea! it was a debate😳.😃

Originally posted by: likarsh

Right. So let's not beat around the bush shall we. It's obvious that this is referring to mystic.

Because criticaleye's posts, the post which actually is the most problematic for many (the slave comment) had been posted weeks back. This thread was dormant.

So suddenly there's a reply. No problem. And a whole lot of replies. Also no problem.

Then comes a misquote, which made me get in.

Mystic only added to my point. It was very much on topic. And why shouldn't she come in and add her point? This thread has no 'attraction' for her or me. It's not her fault that a whole group here automatically labels anything she writes as "wrecking the debate." There was the earlier instance on this thread itself. Where all she did was bring up a valid point. And of course the group comes terming it as not contributing to the "healthy debate."

Apparently healthy debate is limited in who can post, and what type of points can be brought up.

How nice!