Are The CVs Trying To Create Sympathy For Viraj??? - Page 12

damn I should've put my disclaimer . Neways sundas I believe wat I see on screen and I see raghav-viraj as poles apart there is no similarity in them forget abt them being sides of a coin

Mystic, we know what we were saying. It's not our fault if what we are saying is being twisted and manipulated. And when it's pointed out that he too described the characters that way, well it's either trying to give some other meaning to the idiom, or trying to discredit the dude (which by the way is acknowledging that what he said means exactly it means, thus comes the attempt to discredit him. Because after all, if he meant that idiom in some other way, why the need to try to discredit him?)

Originally posted by: Soaps1

It does not matter if he is channel head or not ... he said it right ... they are different sides of same coin ... we all know two sides of same coin are never same ... so he is right

Both are men ... yet they are both so different ... that is the fact!!!

This does not even require arguing

Originally posted by: Soaps1

It does not matter if he is channel head or not ... he said it right ... they are different sides of same coin ... we all know two sides of same coin are never same ... so he is right

Both are men ... yet they are both so different ... that is the fact!!!

This does not even require arguing

Just as some people interpret it as them being similar when we all know both sides of a coin are always different 😊

Originally posted by: -vandy-

damn I should've put my disclaimer . Neways sundas I believe wat I see on screen and I see raghav-viraj as poles apart there is no similarity in them forget abt them being sides of a coin

di 2 poles apart nd 2 opp sides of d same coin is same 2 same...🤣

Originally posted by: Soaps1

Just as some people interpret it as them being similar when we all know both sides of a coin are always different 😊

Originally posted by: -vandy-

damn I should've put my disclaimer . Neways sundas I believe wat I see on screen and I see raghav-viraj as poles apart there is no similarity in them forget abt them being sides of a coin

Originally posted by: mysticgoryfilms

Even Sanjog, the head of Life OK and the person who supervises this show said Viraj and Raghav are similar.

And I quote:

"Raghav and Viraaj r designed as opposite sides of the same coin."

One can refer to his Twitter account for the source.

I like the way he described them.
They have similar temperaments, as in they both get quite angry, and they do things in their own way to get the result they desire.
But just like how a coin has a fine line between boths sides, there is a fine line between Viraj and Raghav.
Raghav's beliefs are completely different to Viraj's. Viraj can easily hit people even women, and he only cares about what he wants, but Raghav is the opposite. So basically they use their powers for different things. Raghav uses his powers to get a good result for the sake of others whereas Viraj uses his power for his own needs.

I personally think they're trying to show that while both may have an aggressive nature, ultimately they're not the same. For this reason I don't think that Raghav could ever hurt Jhanvi. Even when he was about to hit Sundar it was in a comic way rather than a serious way. It differentiates the way Viraj is to the way Raghav is. Just like they are using Raghav's mum to show that just because someone is strict and a perfectionist like Viraj, it doesn't mean if you do something wrong they will abuse you physically or mentally.

And Sundar a slave?
Whoever said that is totally wrong. Keeping someone as a slave is not a small thing or a joke that the term should be thrown around so easily.
Sundar gives Raghav the respect of an older brother, that's why he listens to Raghav not because he is a slave. If he didn't want to do something it's obvious Raghav wouldn't make him do it, as that goes against his beliefs.
I respect my older brothers the same way Sundar does Raghav, and I usually listen to what they ask me to do, and yes when I tease them or anything like that, like Sundar does to Raghav they jokingly hit me, more like a pat lol😆 Does that mean I am their slave? Obviously not. It seems like in this modern age giving respect to others equates to slavery.

As for Viraj getting sympathy that's a personal choice i guess.
No matter what reason he gives for the way he treated Jhanvi, I wouldn't feel sympathy for him.
But if he did really forget everything and then found out how he really was, and he couldn't live with himself then maybe I would feel sorry for him, because he would finally realise how horrible he was to her. But I don't think he's forgotten anything. And I would never forgive him for the way he treated Jhanvi.

How comes everything always turns into Viraj vs Raghav?😆

Anyway carry on with your debate guys as it's good for the rankings😃