And if the Vrinda story is going to develop as in the puranas,
Narayan's deceit would be the worst of all. It is no use excusing it saying that he was defending
dharma. Mahatma Gandhi would have been categoric on this; one cannot defend
dharma thru
adharmicactions, and what Vishnu is said to have done with Vrinda is inexcusable.
To revert, why does Devi Lakshmi not announce her kinship with Jalandhar to him as soon as she stops Narayan from using the sudharshan chakra on him, as requested by Indra? If she had done that, it would have made a huge difference to his blind hatred of thedevas.
Nor is Mahadev free of blame for what Jalandhar has become. Having let Indra off for the cold blooded murder of Trishira, an ascetic engaged in tapas, it is Mahadev who gives birth to Jalandhar, so to speak. Why then does he not take any responsibility for his offspring? Why does he not punish Indra for murdering Jalandhar's mother? What does he mean when he declares that he will be responsible for all of Jalandhar's actions, good or bad? One does not see him doing anything to demonstrate this sense of responsibility.
Quoting these three parts...as i felt these are one of the best analysis 😊
Edited by panchaali - 12 years ago