Saurabh Raj Jain/Vishnuji AT- DT's nt pg 59 - Page 97

Originally posted by: Kadamvari

they are giving too much focus on jallu-vrinda love story which didn't have any focus in purans...the original story is og jallu's lust for paro . vrinda's devotion for vishnu and vishnu as jallu destroying her chastity and thus glorification of goddess tulsi..jallu was not revenge seeker he was plain evil but they should have shown original story without dragging jallu's revenge seeking episode for weeks
parvati never had any memory loss they could show paro ruthi huyi shiv manaofy which is ac to puran
Mahabharat i am praying not come on 8 p.m..dkdm's trp will surely go down otherwise

Originally posted by: princessofkesar

i agree that to favor pandavas may be they made kaurav to evil

pandavas were never my fav

i like krish , karan ,eklavya , bhisma.

but kaurav were not so gud to feel sympathy for them , i mean he tried to burn pandavas , they made fun of draupadi's dignity.

poor duryodhan , if he did not came infront of his mother nude to get total immortality than it is his fault only.

atleast pandavas did not do such evil thing!

y call him gud ruler? what he had done for society n people?

what gud thing asavthama had done? y he turned neg? [he was j of arjun i think , as i think his father dron favored him.

i don't know who are actual heir to the kingdom

the eldest son in the family than duryodhan

but they said eldest son of the king who ruled prior to retirement than again i think after pandhu's death duryo's father only ruled , he was eldest son too.

y people wanted pandavas as ruler than?

Originally posted by: Gods_child

May be Vishnu took blame on himself of destroying chasity..i mean they had no phy relationship vrinda only for moment considered vishnu as jalandhar leaving him unprotected...Cmon a true bhakt like vrinda wont recognise her lord...and seeing lord who will remember husband mother father children after all he is the ultimate...

Originally posted by: princessofkesar

agree the the definition Chasity in olden days was not just remaining loyal in physical relationship but to remain emotionally loyal throughout the relationship.

see parshuram' mom got curse just for imagining her self playing in water wid other apsara n gandharava

so vrinda's failure to recognize the vishnu and accepting him as husband even if it was short tym broke her chasity.

but jhum gave reference of some story where they lived like husband and wives for years in jungle , and after suicide of vrinda vishnu was heartbroken😭

Originally posted by: Kadamvari

to tere pranpriya se pray kar k Mahabharat 6 months k liye nhi 6 saal k liye aye😆

Originally posted by: princessofkesar

isha i don't consider the arjun as main hero , in fact mb does not have solo hero show!

there are many important character , but krishna is central character .

so for me srj is d lead.

compared to arjun it is yudishtir who was more sensible n righteous , he was the one who got moksh !

but link of arjun to krishna biases historian towards him , so arjun is more emphasized!

so human hero also got imp as he was frn ,relative , n jiju of krishna!

btw can saheer be able to justify in the role of eunuch?

he was in that form for 1 yr teaching dance to girls due to curse of urvashi.

the arjun from br chopra mb was too good! he carried himself as hunk and also was gud to show feminine side.

Originally posted by: princessofkesar

agree the the definition Chasity in olden days was not just remaining loyal in physical relationship but to remain emotionally loyal throughout the relationship.

see parshuram' mom got curse just for imagining her self playing in water wid other apsara n gandharava

so vrinda's failure to recognize the vishnu and accepting him as husband even if it was short tym broke her chasity.

but jhum gave reference of some story where they lived like husband and wives for years in jungle , and after suicide of vrinda vishnu was heartbroken😭

Originally posted by: Kadamvari

srj fans end this AT yar only 8 pages r left