India's new found aggression in cricket - Page 2

The way I see it there are quite a few people with less than ordinary looks and demeanor, who get respected. It is his attitude and way he conducts himself that leads him to look like a monkey and hence the monkey chants. If he stopped being full of himself, he would groom himself to be a cricketer not a Halloween parade.

Personally, I hate big hair in sports. Kevin Pieterson used to irk me with his hairstyle, now he looks like a smart sportsman. Lasith Malinga is another player who irksme.

But yes, there are uncanny similarities between him and apes. Missing link in evolution?[/QUOTE]

Couldn't stop 😆😆😆.

Re: Topic - Like everyone here said positive aggression is good otherwise 😛😆

There clearly was a time when Symonds was more well groomed and looked human. It just irks me why cricketers try to have crazy hairstyles, fashion fads and puh-lease sunscreen should not be in unless it really is sunny with risk of sunburn.

^Wo kale hey tho kya hua dil wala hey!!!!

I love his play....very classy player.. 😊

Originally posted by: ChameliKaYaar

Indian pplayers are actually guilty of being too timid and gun-shy. It is encouraging to see the team getting out of that mold and assuming a level of aggression which is required ina ny modern day sport. Ganguly started it and did not entirely endear himself to a section of people because they were not used to an Indian being aggressive. Of course, McGrath or Marsh or Lee being rabid on the field was taken for granted because "it is the nature of the Aussie sport" but how dare a timd Indian bare his attitude.

I am glad to see our young team showing aggression and taking the fight to the enemy's (read: opposition) camp. Of course, Sreesanth made a mockery of the term aggression. 😃

I agree with you, Indians were too timid, now they changed.

Ganguly the most aggressive captain of Team India , opened the path, the youngsters now riding their horse.