Last one, I promise, myself! 😆
Today, I read an article on evolution of humans, and how we can trace ourselves back, all can be told when we came to posess learning skills, etc. from how brain has grown in different species, from genes and brain structure, etc. There was an interesting sentence in there.... it was said that all this new info. was certainly defeating Bible's version of how god put man on earth, etc. It also went onto say how it is not as simple as how religion puts it, but neither is it as easy as science thinks it to be!
why are science and religion always at log-heads? Both notions can be accepted... science can't explain the origin of 'first' life, does it? I don't know any. So, the big bang.... I think god did it 😆 😳 ... something higher has to exist... how does life form spontaneously????? 😕 And science can surely explain the steps, but only guess on the why's. NO concrete reason, right? Both science and religion can be accepted at the same time. 😕
Also, in the article was sentence on how we always think of survival of the fittest (human were preys at one time 😃 )... about agression and all, but survival of the fittest also comes out of feeling sense of security in a group, and from bonding.... IF this is how the human ancestors survived, and indeed can the theory be validated... it should do good for 'peace' missions over people fighting wars for no good reason!!!
Lots going on, your thoughts?😛
Persy
