Lmao bro!! - Page 7

Originally posted by: Minionite

@ Bold: Oh it definitely is hypocrisy. It's not just hypocrisy in this sense, but also in every other sense. On one hand he was against other peaceful protests - First Nations, farm laws, even for BLM at one point he was like they can't occupy streets like this. But here these people took over the full downtown and he just sat in his house like a coward.

He was hypocritical because even though other protests were held on weekends only and that too in emptier streets and areas, he was against those, but here he decided to let these people block off all the borders before he did anything.

And hypocritical in this final sense as well. He had so many options - call the army, order the police to arrest and break up these protests, but no he decides to invoke an Emergency.

Heck I still don't understand why he wanted to force truckers to get vaccines first. He should have mandated vaccines for health care workers and emergency workers. Truckers are by definition already quarantined and socially distanced. Go after the nurses, doctors, police officers, army, etc. who aren't getting vaccinated first!

I fully agree with you on this bit. But at this point I honestly could care less about what happens. Just get this all wrapped up with. It's making Canada look bad on a world stage - even worse than the US and enough is enough.

Vaccines shouldn't have been mandated for anyone. Period. HCW and EW are well educated I guess they can make an educated choice why does it have to be mandated for them of all people.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Vaccines shouldn't have been mandated for anyone. Period. HCW and EW are well educated I guess they can make an educated choice why does it have to be mandated for them of all people.

I think they should be. As a kid we were all mandated to take so many vaccinations. How is this any different? And if it can stop the spread and finally open everything up, then why not?

And honestly sometimes I doubt HCW and EW are well-educated. We have so many cases where HCW and EW are the ones spreading misinformation.

Originally posted by: Minionite

I think they should be. As a kid we were all mandated to take so many vaccinations. How is this any different? And if it can stop the spread and finally open everything up, then why not?

And honestly sometimes I doubt HCW and EW are well-educated. We have so many cases where HCW and EW are the ones spreading misinformation.

Do you think world is opening up because of covid not spreading anymore? And the reason it's not spreading is because of covid jabs?

I wonder what will be constituted as misinformation in the long run.. the one who supported covid jabs and making it mandatory or the one who supported early medication protocol and talked about natural immunity.

*Covid jabs is not same as vaccines.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Do you think world is opening up because of covid not spreading anymore? And the reason it's not spreading is because of covid jabs?

I wonder what will be constituted as misinformation in the long run.. the one who supported covid jabs and making it mandatory or the one who supported early medication protocol and talked about natural immunity.

*Covid jabs is not same as vaccines.

See the problem is that there is so much info out there and so many different approaches. Some countries are fully open even at 50% vaccination status and others are locked down still even at 70 to 80% status. At this point, if it opens up the country, then make the vaccine mandatory or find another way to open everything up.

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

Nice way to escape. When you comment on Indian politics then you don’t remember that I don’t know much about it. 😆

See, this is an anonymous forum. If someone says they don't know much about something, chances are they actually don't.

You can count the number of times I've posted on Indian politics in one hand of yours, they were related to Aryan's imprisonment for over a month based on a mere suspicion. It looked shifty, someone being arrested on false grounds always does. You don't need to ace the indian history & politics exam to conclude that. Similarly, people on the other side then also didn't know much beyond their blind hatred and bigotry against SRK or his religion during then, considering I saw so many people rejoicing over the arrest without an iota of knowledge on the actual politics behind it. Goes to show that even idiots are allowed FOE and the right to vote, does it not? People who revere politicians/ruling government should perhaps check their own biases before gunning others down for simply stating the obvious.

The TM shared a meme with three repulsive characters, comparing them with JT over invoking the emergency act, and I made a post addressing that alone. Others brought Modi/Indian politics into it and I told them I'm not abreast with that side of it. There was really no need for you to swoop down on me here and take digs at my intentions when I hadn't even uttered a word about anything related to India in this thread, now was there?

Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi

Comparison is legit.

Farm laws disrupted lives. Roads blocked over a year. 26th Jan riots at red fort. It was hijacked by Khalistani supporters. Major Fundings were coming in from Canada and UK.

CAA was earliest. And that was also hijacked by communalists. Killed people.

Yet that’s ok coz it happens in India. And if some of us try to reason like you are doing here, oh m gee, hell break lose. Call us names coz we don’t have FOE to support something that’s logical for us.


Leftists supported looting of stores across USA during BLM. Trump should have seized bank accounts of looters. Tab tum logo ka attitude ki kuch Aur hota.

Seizing of bank accounts is draconian. No other way to put it.

So the entire purpose of this thread is to take jabs at people who you guys weren't able to outdo in previous debates? Am I reading that right?

@bold: What is "tum logo ka attitude change hota" agar "yeh hota" and agar "woh hota" supposed to mean? I was listening to LM's yeh kaha aagaye hum and your post doesn't sound that different from that "main aur meri tanhayee" "tum hoti toh yeh kehti" "iss baat pe hasti" dialogs in the beginning. 😆😆Shouldn't you be sticking to facts that are in front of you if you really want to make a point instead of shoving tarot card readings down people's throats?

I'm guessing that you're a Trump supporter cuz you sure are sounding like one.

Originally posted by: anjs

that flag symbol is NOT swastika.......its hakencruz.........you can call it hooked cross, if you cant spell hakencruz.........dont insult swastika which is a hindu symbol and no where related to Nazis

I'm a Hindu too and meant no disrespect there, that's just how most of the people refer to hakencruz/hooked cross without scratching beyond the surface for its actual meaning. But you're right, a hate symbol like that shouldn't be referred to as Swastika at all.

Originally posted by: Minionite

See the problem is that there is so much info out there and so many different approaches. Some countries are fully open even at 50% vaccination status and others are locked down still even at 70 to 80% status. At this point, if it opens up the country, then make the vaccine mandatory or find another way to open everything up.

My point was that at first they claimed that only 70% of the population needed the vaccine to prevent community spread. In addition, anyone infected with COVID develops natural immunity which is ideally stronger than vaccine-induced immunity. Both of these points were ignored when they began imposing vaccines and mandates. The intention was to create a tyrannical state.

They even attempted to alter the definition of a vaccine. I'm surprised you think a COVID passport is just a piece of paper when many countries prohibit people from working, shopping, or moving outside of their home unless they have a COVID passport. That's not a piece of paper.

Originally posted by: SmittenKitten

I'm a Hindu too and meant no disrespect there, that's just how most of the people refer to hakencruz/hooked cross without scratching beyond the surface for its actual meaning. But you're right, a hate symbol like that shouldn't be referred to as Swastika at all.

ok, I didnt know you were a Hindu....... I think at least we should start using the correct word, so that others who aren't aware gets to know the truth.......... I have read how Westerners get scared seeing our swastika cause they dont know the difference...... so we have to make sure that all know about it...

It is said that Haken cruz was a symbol Hitler saw in one of his trip to church in childhood and picked up that symbol for his flag..... even his book mentions it so....also the first translation too mentions it as haken cruz..........its later when a UK guy translated it, that he replaced haken cruz with swastika...... unfortunately, our Govt never bothered to correct it ......

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20210816-the-ancient-symbol-that-was-hijacked-by-evil

Not everyone agreed with this interpretation, however. In his book The Sign of the Cross: From Golgotha to Genocide, Dr Daniel Rancour-Laferriere, an expert on Christianity, suggests that Hitler's decision to use the hakenkreuz as a symbol of the Nazi party "may have been due to his childhood upbringing at the Benedictine Monastery in Austria, where he repeatedly saw the hooked cross in many places".

Originally posted by: Zeal17

My point was that at first they claimed that only 70% of the population needed the vaccine to prevent community spread. In addition, anyone infected with COVID develops natural immunity which is ideally stronger than vaccine-induced immunity. Both of these points were ignored when they began imposing vaccines and mandates. The intention was to create a tyrannical state.

They even attempted to alter the definition of a vaccine. I'm surprised you think a COVID passport is just a piece of paper when many countries prohibit people from working, shopping, or moving outside of their home unless they have a COVID passport. That's not a piece of paper.

I guess it depends on where you are. In Canada, it's supposed to stop you from eating out and going to the gym and a few other things, but many places don't bother following those rules. They look at it if you have it and they pretend not to notice if you don't. And as of March 1st, many provinces are getting rid of the need of it. So it does become a piece of paper.