Smriti Irani slams Deepika : I want to know what her - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

55

Views

4.8k

Users

22

Likes

91

Frequent Posters

guenhwyvar thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

Tulsi ji,pehle apne party ke log se puchiye where they stand when it comes to women.


Actresses should be in Mumbai and dance.. the ruling party everyone. A big round of applause!



https://twitter.com/RichaChadha/status/1215498012522188800?s=19

Does Richa not know how to read? Oh wait ... she read the title and tweeted based on that.


Richa: This is just no way to talk about ministers in your party. So what if they’ve been actresses before? Today they are capable members of the governing party ! Sheesh. So sexist!


What Mohan Bhargava said:

"Heroine should dance in Mumbai. Why should she go to JNU? I do not know. There are many people like her. If they want to do politics then you should enter politics and contest elections."


Disclaimer: Not supporting Bhargava's statement. Just pointing out that Richa's comeback fails because Bhargava clearly differentiates between actresses and politicians.


People -- stop reading clickbait headlines and read the damn article. FFS ...


EDIT: Wait a second ... has anyone here read the article Richa linked? Or are we jumping for joy aivi?

Edited by guenhwyvar - 5 years ago
prerna4rishav thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: guenhwyvar

Does Richa not know how to read? Oh wait ... she read the title and tweeted based on that.


Richa: This is just no way to talk about ministers in your party. So what if they’ve been actresses before? Today they are capable members of the governing party ! Sheesh. So sexist!


What Mohan Bhargava said:

"Heroine should dance in Mumbai. Why should she go to JNU? I do not know. There are many people like her. If they want to do politics then you should enter politics and contest elections."


Disclaimer: Not supporting Bhargava's statement. Just pointing out that Richa's comeback fails because Bhargava clearly differentiates between actresses and politicians.


People -- stop reading clickbait headlines and read the damn article. FFS ...


EDIT: Wait a second ... has anyone here read the article Richa linked? Or are we jumping for joy aivi?

sorry didnt get your point. So because DP or as a matter of fact, anyone is an actress or doctor or engineer or commoner or dancer or writer, he/she should not comment on politics, should not support any cause that's related to politics, should not write on political affairs. Only unpadh gawaar politicians who are Chauthi Fail, should have free pass in commenting on anything - who can eat beef, who can dance and act, who can do what?


Sorry to disappoint you, but democracy doesnt work that way. 🤣 I am a famous doctor and I can go support anyone I want without joining politics. My wish, I mean exactly my wish. What can anyone do about it ? 🤪

monu_tan thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#13

The very fact that the title of the article says Smriti slams DP , but the article says Smriti is okay with DP standing for anyone as it’s her right and people will know who DP stands for.

Where’s the slamming lol?

~*sindhu*~ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: prerna4rishav

sorry didnt get your point. So because DP or as a matter of fact, anyone is an actress or doctor or engineer or commoner or dancer or writer, he/she should not comment on politics, should not support any cause that's related to politics, should not write on political affairs. Only unpadh gawaar politicians who are Chauthi Fail, should have free pass in commenting on anything - who can eat beef, who can dance and act, who can do what?


Sorry to disappoint you, but democracy doesnt work that way. 🤣 I am a famous doctor and I can go support anyone I want without joining politics. My wish, I mean exactly my wish. What can anyone do about it ? 🤪


Label you as anti national, tukde tukde gang member, supporter of Afzal guru and keep repeating it until and unless u stop going against the government.

monu_tan thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 5 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~


Label you as anti national, tukde tukde gang member, supporter of Afzal guru and keep repeating it until and unless u stop going against the government.


Labelling happens both ways. Bhakts, BJP peddler, fascists blah blah.


Why do people think they can get away name calling others? Enjoy democracy

prerna4rishav thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~


Label you as anti national, tukde tukde gang member, supporter of Afzal guru and keep repeating it until and unless u stop going against the government.

you're right. The way it's going, soon there will be a day when we say Gandhi killed Godse.

~*sindhu*~ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: monu_tan


Labelling happens both ways. Bhakts, BJP peddler, fascists blah blah.


Why do people think they can get away name calling others? Enjoy democracy


There is a difference between being called a Bhakt and an anti national. Bhakt doesn't imply u r a criminal, but when u get labelled as anti national and supporter of terrorism, it is being implied u r criminal or a potential criminal. Thats where difference lies and thats how a narrative is set that when u criticise the government or stand against them it means u r against the country. Thats not what democracy means.

AllThatCritique thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: guenhwyvar

Does Richa not know how to read? Oh wait ... she read the title and tweeted based on that.


Richa: This is just no way to talk about ministers in your party. So what if they’ve been actresses before? Today they are capable members of the governing party ! Sheesh. So sexist!


What Mohan Bhargava said:

"Heroine should dance in Mumbai. Why should she go to JNU? I do not know. There are many people like her. If they want to do politics then you should enter politics and contest elections."


Disclaimer: Not supporting Bhargava's statement. Just pointing out that Richa's comeback fails because Bhargava clearly differentiates between actresses and politicians.


People -- stop reading clickbait headlines and read the damn article. FFS ...


EDIT: Wait a second ... has anyone here read the article Richa linked? Or are we jumping for joy aivi?


Everybody read it lol so don't even go there.

Hate to break it to you BUT EVERY CITIZEN has the right to take any political stand of their choosing without joining politics. Its not mandatory lol. People make Politics. People choose Politicians. That's literally democracy. Also standing in solidarity with students who were attacked by rods and could have attacked by acid..one does not need to join politics for that. One does not need to differentiate between actresses and politicians for that. Its ridiculous to even suggest that.

guenhwyvar thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: prerna4rishav

sorry didnt get your point. So because DP or as a matter of fact, anyone is an actress or doctor or engineer or commoner or dancer or writer, he/she should not comment on politics, should not support any cause that's related to politics, should not write on political affairs. Only unpadh gawaar politicians who are Chauthi Fail, should have free pass in commenting on anything - who can eat beef, who can dance and act, who can do what?


Sorry to disappoint you, but democracy doesnt work that way. 🤣 I am a famous doctor and I can go support anyone I want without joining politics. My wish, I mean exactly my wish. What can anyone do about it ? 🤪

Yaar, kaha se kaha ... alright, koi nahi. Let's me try to address any confusions.

My point is that Richa's tweet is a reaction based on the HEADLINE of the article, not on the substance of the article.


The headline is: 'Heroines should be in Mumbai and dance': BJP's Gopal Bhargava


Richa's tweet says: This is just no way to talk about ministers in your party. So what if they’ve been actresses before? Today they are capable members of the governing party ! Sheesh. So sexist!

Bhargava said (as seen when you read the article): "Heroine should dance in Mumbai. Why should she go to JNU? I do not know. There are many people like her. If they want to do politics then you should enter politics and contest elections."


So let's break it down.


Richa links the headline quote to ministers in the party who have been actresses before. In other words, she's pretty much saying that Bhargava's comment insults his own party members too. But Bhargava said that if heroines want to do politics, they should enter politics. In other words, those "capable members of the governing parties" (Richa describes) who were former actresses ... did just that -- they entered politics, so Bhargava's comment wouldn't apply to them.


Simply put -- Bhargava isn't talking about actresses who became politicians ... he is talking about actresses who ARE NOT politicians, but getting involved in politics. Again, I'm not stating he is right or supporting him ... I'm just pointing out what I'm seeing.


In sum -- read the damn article, stop judging and commenting based only on clickbait headlines ... otherwise you look like an idiot (you = generally). Had Richa read the article, she could have crafted a more appropriate comeback to Bhargava's demeaning comment.

Edited by guenhwyvar - 5 years ago
prerna4rishav thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: guenhwyvar

Yaar, kaha se kaha ... alright, koi nahi. Let's me try to address any confusions.


My point is that Richa's tweet is a reaction based on the HEADLINE of the article, not on the substance of the article.


The headline is: 'Heroines should be in Mumbai and dance': BJP's Gopal Bhargava

ok, so how Richa's tweet is wrong or out of place. The substance is as demeaning and explicit as the headline right ? So Richa's tweet is also relevant and proper! The guy is clearly policing what an actress should or should not do. Why ? There comes Richa's reply.

What acc. to you would be proper reply to such nonsensical stuff as Gopal Bhargava ?

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".