Originally posted by: K.Universe.
It is stoic to say that pain and suffering are a natural by-product.
However, I don't see a need for life to embrace stoicism. Smacks of Stockholm Syndrome to me.
A dog-eat-dog world where one organism can only survive at the expense of another is an imperfect system, not to mention unscrupulous. If that is the only viable system, life is better off without it.
The whole point is that if there is a Creator, the Creation should have been "more intelligent" where there are no undesirable consequences. And if the consequences are unavoidable, there shouldn't have been a creation to begin with.
On the other hand, if there is no Creator, then there is no debate here.
Pain is pain because we have neurotransmitters. Existence/universe doesn't know no pain or pleasure. It's us living creatures :) And as pain is inevitable, life is so heartbreakingly beautiful, we are bound to bear suffering with stoic resignation.
The "intelligent" life(or universe) only knows change. It is neutral. There is nothing positive or negative. It is us, ones with nervous system that label this and that "pain", "pleasure", positive, negative etc. The ginormous Earth on which us living creatures live, is a tiny spec in this infinite universe, what is our "pain" now?.
Actually, in the whole universe, pain and suffering are too tiny, it is just because of damn nerves. Isn't pain good btw? Pain is just another sensation. It can be enjoyed too. My existence has given me pleasures, it is my same existence that is giving me pain, maybe, it is doing so to make me grow or maybe something unknown to me. How will we understand when the existence is more intelligent than us? How can WE say it could've been more intelligent, when it is more intelligent than us.
Edited by Angel-likeDevil - 10 years ago