Originally posted by: K.Universe.
Sounds too mechanical, too robotic.
Let's take a real life example. In the Antarctic, we have emperor penguins who have to endure freezing temperatures and deadly cold to protect their young while the female penguins go on a long trek back to sea in search of food with no guarantee of returning and in the process leaving a few baby penguins as orphans to die of hunger and cold later.
How would you convince the penguins that this is necessary to "influence the evolutionary trajectory"?
Take another real life example. In the African Savannah, we have male lions savagely killing off cubs to advance their genes. How would you convince the cubs whose skulls are getting crushed that it is just an "electrochemical reaction"?
I m not sure if we can rationalize pain like that.
Will try to take a more emotional approach if you say so : ))
There never is a guarantee to anything yet the mama penguin takes the arduous journey out of her love for the young one. Not doing so would cause her emotional distress. So though the objective appears to be feeding the young one the mama penguin is actually giving in to her own emotions when she decides to take that journey. In other words each life form consciously or instinctly attempts to adjust its actions to ensure a state of its own mental or emotional wellbeing.
Nature or Creator hasn't plotted against the Penguins. The harsh cold conditions is common to all who stay on in that region. Some animals migrated and adapted whereas some decided to stay on and adapt to the Antarctica. If there is the cold condition to contend with there is also the fact that there are less predators to watch out for (Only polar bears and the Orkas would be cause for worry I think).
Penguins don't need any convincing since I doubt that they seek any.
The case of the lions in the African savannahs gets even more interesting. What appears as savage killing of their own cubs to advance their genes cannot be termed as cruel or unintelligent. Cruelty in the strict sense of the term implies a malicious intent to harm or cause pain. Other than humans no other animal is known to be capable of malicious intent. The cubs for their part are not seeking any answer to the savage behaviour of their parents and hence no convincing sought or required. They take life as it happens. Only human beings have the capability of seeking answers and tried to come up with more humane ways to advance desirable genetic pool through all those stressful R&D in the field of genetic science, technology, industrial , economic and political field working towards that goal. The animals seem to have achieved the same goal of advancing better genes without much ado.
Unlike animals, the human beings have the capability to realise the impermanence of all forms they see around themselves yet the attachment to hold on to the ephemeral causes suffering. Do humans have the capability to get over such attachments and overcome suffering or has the Creator been too unkind in denying that capability to the human beings!