Awesome-blossom thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
Do you support euthanasia

First of all euthanasia means painless killing. (Eg. Through a painless injection etc)

Do you think it should be made legal for a perosn whose body is paralysed below the neck and there are no hopes from medica,l as in no hopes for recovery ,?
should that person be granted euthanasia on the premise that he/she has the right to a dignified death.?

And also share you r views on decriminalisation of attempted suicide 😲
Edited by Awesome-blossom - 11 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

1.5k

Users

7

Likes

20

Frequent Posters

thegameison thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Yes.

There is nothing more to it. If they think their life should be ended, so it should be. Continuing to live would only mean medical bills and misery to their folks and most importantly, no scope of recovery. Then again, there may be people who'd still go for the available options and if they do, they should. Otherwise, euthanasia should be just as legit as say, DNR.

Decriminalization of attempted suicide is a different thing altogether. In my opinion, it's foolish to imprison or fine a person for taking their own life. If you want them to understand the value of life or whatever, order them to go to therapy, rehab, the works. Know what I mean?
Awesome-blossom thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: epiphany.

Yes.

There is nothing more to it. If they think their life should be ended, so it should be. Continuing to live would only mean medical bills and misery to their folks and most importantly, no scope of recovery. Then again, there may be people who'd still go for the available options and if they do, they should. Otherwise, euthanasia should be just as legit as say, DNR.

Decriminalization of attempted suicide is a different thing altogether. In my opinion, it's foolish to imprison or fine a person for taking their own life. If you want them to understand the value of life or whatever, order them to go to therapy, rehab, the works. Know what I mean?


yep i got you 😊

and i Agree
with you 👏

in the painless death, i guess it should be as legit as dNR only but should be
perform with care as people can be killed in name of euthanasia 😳

suicide, yes those should be treated with a psychologist or the counselor for the depression or anyother sort of problems 👍🏼
imprisonment is not a good option 😕 indeed a brainless decision to imprison a person who is already in a sort of depression

trolldemortx thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
It actually depends on a person's point of view !
and that individual's religious views! so I guess it differs! and as for me, Yes.. I do support it !
return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#5

I think the topic title should read about "euthanasia". Painless death is misleading because everyone wants their death to be painless. Also painless is inaccurate because unless mixed and administered correctly the lethal injection can be quite painful.

Even in Euthanasia you have many forms - active and passive/consensual and non-consensual

Active euthanasia is actually giving the lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is taking someone off life support or life sustaining medicines.

Consensual euthanasia is when a patient chooses to receive euthanasia. Non-consensual is when the patient is incapacitated and comatose and the family makes the decision.

I think passive euthanasia is more or less accepted. Terminally ill cancer or AIDS patients often forego chemo or palliative treatment that extends life to pass away sooner. Taking off comatose patients from life support is more controversial, but people are accepting it gradually.

Active euthanasia is more controversial especially when non-terminally ill patients choose to do so. Many people find it to be a slippery slope that may allow suicide to become acceptable. And it can be tricky - should a paraplegic war veteran be allowed the right to die because his life will never be the same, should an elderly man suffering from Alzheimer's be allowed the right to die because day to day functioning is difficult. Should people with family and loved ones be treated differently from people who have no one to their name?

Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#6
The 'right to die with dignity'.. SCI has not yet decided on this issue that came up a few months ago.
I'm somewhat against euthanisia. Unless the patient themselves request, I dont think there's any need to practise this. I dont think doctors should be given an authority to decide if such and such patient is sooo terminally ill that there's point of no return. It's not like deciding whether a person needs a surgery or not... it's his life.
When a man is in comatose state, I believe he is alive and wishes to live.. there must be some consciousness somewhere inside him, that is why he is still laying on the bed. Our medicine hasnt advanced yet... human body is a mystery even today.
BTW, burden of what? Medical bills burden?! It's part of life, the bed-ridden man is supposed to be your beloved, your family.. would people stop having babies because pregnancy and the entire phase of tutelage is a costly/risky affair? And, my point is.. how can you decide to put an end to your own family when they themselves are in a miserable condition.
It is sad.. sad how people look at their family as a "burden" , no matter how "practical" they may sound.
My grandpa was comatose for a year, and he'd respond to my mother presence, voice, etc.. Even before he went into a vegitative state - for 2-3 months, he was losing control over his senses and would make ruckus in the hospital, throw tantrums , yell at my grandma to get him discharged, refuse to eat etc -- he'd never eat unless my mother went to the hospital and fed him, stayed with him consoled him like a mother does to a child - talked endlessly to him. And he'd calm down at the sight of my mother, beg her not to leave, complain on my grandma, nurses, doctors, to my mother etc. I've witnessed some beautiful moments then, which I cannot express in words.. All I can say is the patient goes through emotional trauma, experiences complex feelings that only further deteriorates their state of mind, body, soul...
Grandpa would respond when my mother visited them in his comatose state too... Nothing can touch a person like love does. And I believe in showering love and attention to people in such state... everyone's sure to die, but wouldnt it be beautiful if they'd have a taste of what love is before they die, esp when they themselves are miserable? Sorry if this sounds filmy.
I was hospitalised/bed-ridden for 5-6 days too...and trust me, a patient generally feels more burden than the family. Everytime you see your beloved checking on you, caring for you, bothering about you, doing EVERYTHING for you - without regard for themselves... you only wish to get better, sooner and end up in guilt for causing unease to family. What is lacking in this world is love.
Edited by Angel-likeDevil - 10 years ago
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#7
^^ That's true. Love is indeed lacking. People actually don't want to have kids as they are too time consuming and need too much care and a costly proposition too! Many don't wish to be bothered with ill parents and would prefer to dump them in old age homes. So not at all surprising that there would be many takers for active euthanasia. Why waste all that money, time, energy and waste hospital beds that could be used for patients who have more chances of recovery?
Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: zorrro

^^ That's true. Love is indeed lacking. People actually don't want to have kids as they are too time consuming and need too much care and a costly proposition too! Many don't wish to be bothered with ill parents and would prefer to dump them in old age homes. So not at all surprising that there would be many takers for active euthanasia. Why waste all that money, time, energy and waste hospital beds that could be used for patients who have more chances of recovery?

I think society should move towards taking a positive path. Waste all money, energy, time... I dont get this at all! Those humans now all vegged out were once people who contributed to the society, were once people who did not see their child as a burden while parenting them!
Arre, they're your fellow living beings!
Man is basically lethargic, materialistic. Like Machiavelli said, love is subject to conditions...bond of love is broken for attainment of selfish desires.
These issues only make me cry. What an ugly world :'(
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9
*Sigh* its an ugly world alright. The predominant trait of human beings these days is selfcentredness. Everything revolves around I, me, myself. Any self respecting or sensitive ill person (doesn't have to be terminally ill at that) would wish himself dead than be a burden on unwilling or unloving relatives.
Angel-likeDevil thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: zorrro

*Sigh* its an ugly world alright. The predominant trait of human beings these days is selfcentredness. Everything revolves around I, me, myself. Any self respecting or sensitive ill person (doesn't have to be terminally ill at that) would wish himself dead than be a burden on unwilling or unloving relatives.

Everyone's sensitive, I can say that.. no matter what they project of themselves.
This reminds me of people with disablities.. I read about many how they wish to go back to their hospitals(mentally disabled), or somewhere else... because of not just their aretakers, but because of how they're looked at, sometimes traumatised by their neighbours/relatives.
What kind of world is this. How many years will it take to care for a fellow human, show some compassion etc? What has a man to lose, if he can just smile or show a loving gesture to PWDs? Just say a warm 'good morning' to such people, their whole face lightens up. OK, I better stop here... I can go all day long crying on this.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".