Originally posted by: qwertyesque
ok here are the reasons... lets understand how are remixes different from the originals..
1. They have new original sound with state-of the art mixes to an old, otherwise slow compositions...
2. They have some nice visuals...
3. They have fast beat and rhythm...
Now tell me dewey why do you think any of this is bad and secondly why cant it be better than the original...?😊
Ok now I remember by seeing your points ..with whome I had this debate before 😆😆😆
See old compositions have their own flavour ..whenever we listen to those it is not only music or tune that matters .. it is the way an artist conveyed it ,the way original creator made an artist to convey his\her art. I don't know if those music director would approve such remixes or not . it feel to me like if one add more colors to "mona lisa" because colors used were yellowish and she would look better to some with added lip color and blush etc. 😆
To me if music director approves such remixes ..than it is ok other wise it is a kind of crime. I dont know if they pay any kind of royalty to orginal singers ,music directors and lyricists or their families.
As for visuals .. come on .. most of such visuals are nice to male specie of particular age and ofcourse marital status has strong influence on it too .. on top of it if they have kids and even if they are in early 20s forget about it 😛😆
Be realistic such remixes cant' be enjoyed with family..
As for fast beat and rythm .. well why not make new compositions rather than distorting preexisted one. To me such remixes are made mostly to make easy money on some one else's hard work.
Yes I agree with Sareg on point that with remixes old songs reappear.. but I would rather suggest to digitaly remaster the original track and make new video on those compositions rather making a remix .. and yes .. no indecent videoes plzzzzzz
Edited by Morning_Dew - 17 years ago