Independence-Coz Of Our Freedom Fighter or Not?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Ankithate

@Ankithate

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#11

@return To Hades.

It was USA only , which forces Britishers to get back as why Britishers civilians would Mind if they ruling some country?
For years no civilian movement or any civilians union speaks not to rule india than why aftr world war they said ?
It was USA who dont wanted to be called partial in front of world thats why they said britishers to go back and make their own dynasity , and i m not saying tyx to USA to give us freedom.. It was just india luck that we gets freedom othrwwise u talking about freedom fighters and common man who fight and all movement , they were going on from years , before world war too..
Than why suddenly aftr world war britishers set back , certainly not coz of our freedom fighters , yaa they fighted truely and we are thankfull to them but keeping sentiments aside its not freedom fighter who did it..

Yaa the only thing which played role was hindu muslim Riot. Thats was the reaason which do play the role coz of which they left earlyyy...

Edited by Ankithate - 13 years ago

Quote

373577

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: Ankithate
@return To Hades.

It was USA only , which forces Britishers to get back as why Britishers civilians would Mind if they ruling some country?
By what logic did you arrive at this conclusion that US alone was the reason 😕

People generally do not have consensus on a lot many issues so why assume that every British citizen was for colonial rule? There always have been human beings in every nation who stood against opression of humanity in any form anywhere.

For years no civilian movement or any civilians union speaks not to rule india than why aftr world war they said ?

Lot of events build up before some results start showing up. public opinion takes time to be voiced.

It was USA who dont wanted to be called partial in front of world

Why should US have bothered about being considered partial or impartial? Was there a popularity contest going on?

thats why they said britishers to go back and make their own dynasity ,

Whatever does that imply?😕

and i m not saying tyx to USA to give us freedom.. It was just india luck that we gets freedom othrwwise u talking about freedom fighters and common man who fight and all movement , they were going on from years , before world war too..

say you have to appear for your annual exams. Would you attribute your success to your studies only on the day previous to your exam or would you also lend some credit to all those hours of studying you put in since months? Or just dismiss it as luck?

Than why suddenly aftr world war britishers set back , certainly not coz of our freedom fighters , yaa they fighted truely and we are thankfull to them but keeping sentiments aside its not freedom fighter who did it..

You can keep your thanks to yourself. I am sure the freedom fighters who sacrificed their all towards the cause did not hanker for any thanks from future generation who would be born in a free India.

Yaa the only thing which played role was hindu muslim Riot. Thats was the reaason which do play the role coz of which they left earlyyy...
😲 what syllabus are they teaching students these days

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Ankithate

@Ankithate

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#13

@zorrro

watever replies u have given are just good for laughs. Had good tym reading them!

But
On a serious note , none of ur answer was like an answer !

Quote

373577

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: Ankithate
@zorrro

watever replies u have given are just good for laughs. Had good tym reading them!

But
On a serious note , none of ur answer was like an answer !

coming from you it is not at all surprising 😉 😃

Quote

wanker

@wanker

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: Wave.

Yes ofcourse our freedom fighters had a very big role to play in Indias freedom struggle,It wasnt just luck that after fighting world wars Britishers got too tired and decided to leave India.The freedom struggle had its roots in the long silent oppression that Indians were going through.

I agree with this.

Also to add, we didn't get freedom because of so called "Mahatma" Gandhi. It was mainly because the British lost much of its army and money in the 2nd World war. It was getting difficult to be in India, they just wanted a reason to leave. They left India in a chaos by splitting India... it's a shame Gandhi agreed with partition. It's all because of him millions of people died in name of religion, millions were left homeless... It was the biggest black day in India's history. The man who caused it, we worship him right now.

Indian's don't know half of the story that happened pre-1947.

Edited by wanker - 13 years ago

Quote

Ankithate

@Ankithate

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#16

@zorro

yaa because i like making sense and not let silly jokes passing evry single time :)

@wanker

i Agreed to what You said ! ||

Quote

wanker

@wanker

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#17

Useless post deleted please!

Edited by wanker - 13 years ago

Quote

Angel-likeDevil

@Angel-likeDevil

Trailblazer

+ 3

Posted: 13 years ago

#18

See, something that big and that major as Independence cannot be because of only one reason.

It's based on numerous factors. The British imperialism was under pressure due to many factors.

#1 --- The world wars which had serious ramifications(casulaties, other losses) on UK, and also these two wars gave rise to UN and other organizations with an objective of peace, liberty, fraternity, etc. UK was also a part of those countries that headed these treaties/agreements, etc. So, it wouldnt make any sense if it was imposing imperialism on another country!

#2 --- The population explosion in India that couldnt be checked and British couldnt handle the secular state, the communal sensitivities, the poverty. It is imperative to note that, the land of India was over-used... For example - the Indigo cultivation is said to hamper the fertility of the soil over a period of time, even after relinquishing the cultivation, it renders the land useless for a couple of years . Like this, it is said that the country was losing out of natural resources. The land was already being exploited, and there wasnt much the country could offer after 200 years.

#3 --- Pressure from the Indian freedom fighters ofcourse! There were men like Dadabai Naoroji that started exposing the true motive of the Colonial rule to the world and to the oblivious Indians. There were countless number of riots, agitators, etc.

Patriotism grew in all spheres possible. There was press which exposed the realities of colonialism; there was transportation that helped the Indians from all corners to communicate, exchange views, ambitions, experiences; the Indians were trying to get everywhere they could, they were even adamant on attempting Civil Services exam, and some did pass the exam; they even formed political groups and continued to fight for their rights... slowly slowly. Not only did they oppose the unfair standards set by imperialists, they want SOVEREINGTY, they wanted a Swa-raj, with a constitution of their own. This demand is a very serious one. How could they convince the angry Indians asking for independence?!

It cannot be said it's solely because of the freedom fighters. Like I said, it depended on numerous factors.

Also, when East India Company first landed and established it's 'reign' in India, it was given a carte blanche by the British Queen(later, the Queen and British govt did intervene etc). The governors and people in power established their own 'governmental laws/rules' by pursuing and manipulating the Indian Kings/royalities who were fighting amongst themselves and lacked the sense of administration and leadership themselves. HERE, they did mis-use naive Indians, but as times passed, there was shift of powers from EIC, to the British Queen... which actually changed the entire game once the Indians realised their true colours, and also due to the two World Wars.

There's a lot I can say, but whatever I have said will suffice to make my point clear, I guess :)

Edited by Angel-likeDevil - 13 years ago

Quote

wanker

@wanker

Inactive

Posted: 13 years ago

#19

Err FFS, mistake again. Delete Please!!

Edited by wanker - 13 years ago

Quote

Ankithate

@Ankithate

Navigator

Posted: 13 years ago

#20

@angel Like Devil

See this what actually what my topic head says , is coz of freedom fighter?
Not Really.
Yaa Many reasons can be there as u mentioned them. And the reason i mention of USA and world War was just An example in Comparison to Freedom fighter that yaa there could and there is others factors too wich led to indias freedom.
And the Other factors were bigger than the freedom fighters (with due respect) . . One cant ignore the FACT

And yaa the points you mention certainly can be the reason. . and ya may be more..

Edited by Ankithate - 13 years ago

Quote

1 2 3

Independence-Coz Of Our Freedom Fighter or Not? - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics