Originally posted by: hippi2go
We as society are too used to this theory of a man ruling a household, a man being the head of the household, and a man bringing money to a home, that it just seems abit awkward to see the same man living with their wives family...I think a man's ego plays a big part too. No guy with a go-getter attitude would actually wanna live in their sasural for more than a month. If they have a good job, if they have the ability to earn money for the family, then they would not want to be barden-ing anyone.
We are from early age are too used to the fact that a woman leaves her family...so now if the opposite happens we feel weirded out and immediately draw a conclusion of the man to be a looser😕😆
Well I think this 'Ghar jamai' notion is man-made and quite stupid.
What's wrong if a husband stays with his in-laws...if a woman is expected to leave her family and move in with her husbands family why not the other way round?
I think this is basically our mind-set which makes peopel look down upon ghar-jamais.Such husbands are branded as losers and cowards who cannto afford their own house and are incapable of runnign and managing a family.which is very stupid.
plus, in history man is teh house head and is not expected to atke help from in-laws.
but i personally think it's fair enough for a husband to live with in-laws.We need to change our views..tahts' abotu ti!