There was an interesting discussion on the morning radio talk show here. One listener is a mom of a 5 yr old daughter and a 9 yr old boy. She had her daughters ears pierced at 6 mos. Now her son wants to get his ears pierced. She turned him down, because she feels earrings are for girls not boys. Obviously her son is upset at his moms 'unfairness', why can't he if his little sister can. The mom is wondering if her decision is reasonable or actually unfair double standards for her kids. People were calling in and discussing their opinions. Some people said that parents both kids should be able to get pierced and she is being unfair. Some people feel that its ok to discriminate this way because some things don't suit boys like earrings, long hair and they can do all that when they grow up.
What do people think of this? Is the mom being reasonable or unfair?
Are there instances where it is ok/not ok to distinguish between ones kids? Obviously there will be some age discrimination, older kids can watch some shows, can have/go to sleepovers while younger kids have to wait till they are older.
Is it ok to discriminate between kids on gender. I know that for many desi families, boys tend to be allowed to go out late more than girls, in many cultures people are ok with male youth smoking or drinking but not girls, on the other hand girls tend to get away with other things.
In what instances parents intentionally discriminate between kids? Is it always fair? How do parents explain to kids that these different rules are fine and not unfair.