Breaking the illusion - Page 2

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@priti nice analysis as always. yes I agree to you. Yash should get the highest punishment. See even if she establishes Aravind a terrorist, she cannot vindicate Asad without discrediting the white collar terrorist Yash.

@sur can you disapprove Yash. The question is that. It is not what Asad said or did. It is that army and police claim Asad to be a terrorist. At this point there is no concrete evidence, only doubts to think otherwise. Agree to you Radhika is the key. One more thing we have to know. In court witness beyond doubt and proofs only matter. It has to be established, it has to be proved. We can ask questions like why would he tell etc.. but court doesn't accept that.

yes very true Shruthi, but atleast someone has to see things now. Whatever swa is pointing are not lame claims. It is a very big thing that an alleged terrorist called an army officer on the same day. Also the house was raided just after the call.Yeah i know everyone is going to believe their so called brave soldier yash for now, but it will be fun to see their faces when yash will be exposed. Yash will break down when Radhika will disapprove him.

Asad called Abhay also after calling yash, hope swa raises this.An alleged terrorist called the DCP crime and an army officer just before the blast.Swa doesnot have any evidence other than the phone records, no eye witness ..nothing.. She has three people : Radhika, Yash and Arvind ... two of them are already lying.Lets see what happens from now..how swa brings them to dance on her tunes..😲

@Sur - Swadheenta is asking the right questions, but if you think about it, so are the Sinha's. This case is about whether the Jialni's are terrorists or not. Not about whether Aravind is a terrorist or not. As important as that question is, it is for the police and the army to answer, catch and bring him to justice. Unless Swadheenta can establish that he was actually present there at the same time that the blasts happened, there is no escape for the Jilani's. That is what is going against her at the moment. Although she is saying that he was present, she has not been able to prove it. That is why, although she has mentioned it many times that there was another person, it has not been deemed important. It is not that the 4th person being present is not important in general. But is it not important in the context of this case, because a 4th person being present does not prove the Jilani's are not terrorists.

Originally posted by: Soapoperasrfun

@Sur - Swadheenta is asking the right questions, but if you think about it, so are the Sinha's. This case is about whether the Jialni's are terrorists or not. Not about whether Aravind is a terrorist or not. As important as that question is, it is for the police and the army to answer, catch and bring him to justice. Unless Swadheenta can establish that he was actually present there at the same time that the blasts happened, there is no escape for the Jilani's. That is what is going against her at the moment. Although she is saying that he was present, she has not been able to prove it. That is why, although she has mentioned it many times that there was another person, it has not been deemed important. It is not that the 4th person being present is not important in general. But is it not important in the context of this case, because a 4th person being present does not prove the Jilani's are not terrorists.

In the 3rd hearing I think she will prove something related to finger-prints etc to establish that just as Asad was there at the crime scene, so was Aravind and hence he has to be questioned. Till she does that, there is no relevance of Aravind to this case...

Does that make sense?😆

Yep it makes some sense, aaah mummy, ye show mere se meri naukri churva ke rahega.. dinbhar ratbhar bas yahi sochna.. i know truth will come out some day or other but the way they have directed the show is what making me so obsessive n restless.

Poor but yet so brave Swadhinta, is show ka naam swadhinta hona chahiy tha yar. tridha has done complete justice to the role. From being a sahmi hui si lawyer on her first hearing today she is a ferocious tigress . From being a cold and conservative girl bounded by the promise she did to Appa ..she became a madly in love girlfriend ,a good SIL to free her BIL from long hidden truth,and now a loving wife and a resposible DIL who is not ready to leave her family in this tough situation despite of all the allegations made about her, she is firm as she knows why they are behaving like this. Kudos to the writer who made Swadhinta.

while I think adarsh is still not supporting swadheenta, he is beginning to see her perspective but cannot be on her side fully. the wheels in his head are turning for sure. it is just in front of his family, he cannot defend because he himself thinks swadheenta is wrong. I don't know what he is doing now but he is not bad as we think.

@priti you make complete sense. I know very well what Swa will have to establish. Murder weapon and finger prints on them.

Originally posted by: shruthiravi

@priti you make complete sense. I know very well what Swa will have to establish. Murder weapon and finger prints on them.

Aravind was not wearing gloves when he shot Abhay.

But why nobody is talking about the weapon yet, did the police secured it or not. In any criminal case the weapon used for crime is the most crucial evidence. As tehy are saying the gift is the most crucial evidence to prove haider's involvement like wise the gun has to be there to prove Abhay's murder. Waiting desperately for third hearing. the precap was very disturbing as the tone in which the judge spoke to swa was way too harsh. he was as if he is doing some favour to swa by delaying the verdict .The way he consoled suha proved the affect of power in our system. Suha is an old renowned lawyer practising in the same court since years.The judge very easily gave her the permission to fight the case eventhough conflict of interest was there. This shows the effect of power in our system. He is already more inclined towards suha. i really want to hear his verdict, the verdict should include all the aspects starting from yash to arvind, manohar etc etc. he has to say that injustice has been done to the true hero of the day, he has to apologize on behalf of everyone , the verdict has to be historical in every sense.

@sur bias will happen. As people in power know each other and want to do favour for each other. Suha as mother stands tall

i want too see this judge's face once the Allan broad case comes out

@moon the lie of Yash Bundela has to be exposed. But the fact is that even if Radhika comes she can only give circumstance evidence to prolong case. But cannot establish Asad not guilty or involvement of Aravind. She can plant a doubt. Murder weapon is the key. Why do I feel the guy in that discotheque will show up. He is the only one who knows Aravind gave him the pistol and Asad thanking him. That scene rattles me. Because Adarsh, Jaya, Jai were witness to that guy holding pistol. The conclusive evidence lies there.