Rana Naved Or Sami(Why Dropped)

Lovers Ka Love thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1

I DOnt Know That If there is Perfect Pacer In Paki Team Why Do Selecters Drop Him.... If shoaib Is'nt there, Dont YOu Think They Need a Pacer Like Sami...... Wicket TO Wicket Bowler......

Is Sami is Better Or Rana.......... The Type Of Perfomances he is Giving now-a-dayz.... I DOnt Think he is the need of Team ....... Sami is Better....

Created

Last reply

Replies

4

Views

574

Users

4

Frequent Posters

mini2390 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
i personally prefer sami over rana, and plus sami even chips in a lot in batting even though hes not a batsmen.... rana is also a good bowler, but he gives away too many runs and especially recently..... i dont know y rana isnt dropped though... i think sami shud be brought in in the next match

in an interview, inzamam stated that he hasnt been -playing sami cuz he thinks sami isnt taking continuous wickets.... i agree, sumtimes sami may not be the best of wicket taking bowlers that pak has, but i think hes a fighter and plays really well, i prefer him over rana ryt now!
Howlarious thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
Sami at the moment. Don't know what is going on with Rana
kal-el thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
no way they are both poor bowlers, there was a time when sami was good but he is really poor at the moment along with rana
Lovers Ka Love thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: mini2390

i personally prefer sami over rana, and plus sami even chips in a lot in batting even though hes not a batsmen.... rana is also a good bowler, but he gives away too many runs and especially recently..... i dont know y rana isnt dropped though... i think sami shud be brought in in the next match

in an interview, inzamam stated that he hasnt been -playing sami cuz he thinks sami isnt taking continuous wickets.... i agree, sumtimes sami may not be the best of wicket taking bowlers that pak has, but i think hes a fighter and plays really well, i prefer him over rana ryt now!

Thats true, Sami is not Taking Wickets continously but He is not as Much expensive Bowler as Rana...

So instead Of Rana , they Need Sami

Related Topics

Cricket thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh · 5 months ago

https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/bangladesh-drop-out-of-form-najmul-hossain-shanto-make-five-changes-for-sri-lanka-t20is-1493496 Changes are...

Expand ▼
Cricket thumbnail

Posted by: Nishnesh · 6 months ago

Rana added for Indian test team for Headinglay test

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".