Originally posted by: Namratha.
If god would grant you three boons...what are the things you will ask from it???
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025: India vs Oman, 12th Match, Group A at Abu Dhabi🏏
VICTIM KAUN 🤧 19.9
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 28
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 20th Sep 2025 - WKV
Armaan has always been the victim
Deepika starts shooting for King
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sept 20, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Appreciation Post for Ruheen
Anupamaa 19 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Happy birthday Namik Paul❤️🔥🩷
Now Nag Ashwin takes a dig at Deepika for the Kalki mess
Anupamaa 20 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
🏏 Asia Cup 2025: Sri Lanka vs Bangladesh, Super Four, Match 1 Dubai🏏
Singer Zubeen Garg Passes Away
Veer Hanuman - Chat Club #4
Aneet replaces Kiara in Shakti Salini
Book Talk Reading Challenge & Book Bingo ~ Oct 2025 Sign up open!
Homebound - OSCARS 2026 Official Indian Entry
These were Deepika's demands for Kalki
“Why aren’t Bollywood actresses supporting Deepika? - Upala KBR
Originally posted by: Namratha.
If god would grant you three boons...what are the things you will ask from it???
This is getting interesting...😆 I will continue...my questions in red.Can you justify -1. ACP shooting Nakul in Trail in London? Was he right?- No... Nakul was a criminal... but shooting him to death was not right. ACP shouldnt have got influenced by others thinking and should have done what he would do in case of other criminals. May be shot him in the leg.. or hand.. just to injure and catch him... but ACP's anger that his son was a criminal owerpowered him and made him kill his son.. or may be he didn't want to face the embarrasment of his son facing a trial in front of him... so he chose the easier way.Suppose you are given a gun and are taken to the room where the renowned terrorist (who shot several people in Mumbai CST and is given 5 star treatment in a prison even after death sentence has been given) is staying. You are given the option to shoot him or spare him. Everyone in the world knows he's guilty and you are given an assurance that there will be no case against you. What will you do?- If you are expecting me to say that I will shoot him..then...its a No. I wouldn't do that. Murder is a murder... be it of a murderer or a innocent person. If i was a cop... and the criminal was trying to escape or catching him alive was impossible without hardmin others then.. yes I would shoot...but if he is easy to catch ... then nope.. Even as a cop I wouldn;t kill the criminal.But if possible I would show the same gun to the judge or someone who can punish him and ask him to pass the verdict which is right for him.2. ACP suspecting Abhijeet in Sr Insp Abhijeet and asking for a blood test? Do you think the blood test was necessary? Why?- Yes. ACP asking for blood test was necesaary... Abhijeet was missing from the bureau and wasnt available on phone that would mean that Abhijeet was hiding something... may be he was involved in this murder.. to hide the previous one.Its like a t test... How do one define if a person is innocent... by proving the theory of he being guilty is wrong..i.e. failing the null hypothesis 😆There is another question which I have to ask after this. But first let me clarify. Do you think ACP personally thought that Abhijeet was guilty?- Look...thats like asking a 4th person, as to what the 3rd person thinks of, what the 2nd person thinks of the 1st person... 😆 I mean...its like asking me (4th person) as to what does the writer (3rd person) thinks of what ACP (2nd person) thinks of Nakul (1st person).- But the writer himself has made it clear later that ACP felt that Abhijeet is innocent but personal feelings don;t work...we need proof
Asto...I didn't ask you to decide whether Mr AK is guity or not. It has been proven that he's guilty. He shot down innocent people in Mumbai CST. If you have been asked to finish the formalities by the judge would you do it or not? That was my question.
- Finishing the formalities on Judges order 😆 What am I the Hangman?? But if thats my task...i mean my job... and I have the order from the Judge to shoot him.. Yes... I would do it.Also I wanted to know whether you feel it's right to keep him alive even after he has been proven guilty.Don't you think his accomplices will try freeing him by hijacking a plane and asking for his release as ransom??- Its totally wrong to keep him alive...Yes.. I am sure sooner or later some plane or something will be hijacked and he might be freed...But don;t you think there is something else which should be blamed??? Bhopal gas tragedy happened in 1984... and by the time all the legal stuff was over..some of the people responsible were already dead. The system above is slow and corrupted... If people there did think of the country ... then AK's end would be a repilica was Osama's end.About the next part...Here again I didn't ask you what the writer thought. I think I had mentioned this in the beginning. Think of what you saw on screen and from that do you feel ACP suspected Abhijeet or not? Why did ACP ask for Abhijeet's blood test - because ACP suspected him or to make sure that there is official proof of his innocence?😆 How can you expect me to think what ACP thought...while ACP and Abhijeet both were the writers creation.. Anyways.. If I was the writer of the story... then like i said before ACP would be sure that Abhijeet was innocent and blood test was just to prove that he is not guilty.(After this I will be on mobile, so changing colours will be tough for me)
Rate yourself on the scale of 5
1)extrovert - 1
2)Optimist - 1
3)Emotional - 2
4) Practical - 5
5)jelous - 3 😛
6)Generous - 3
7)Crazy - 3
8)Childish - 3
9)Mature - 2
10)Artistic - 0😆
Originally posted by: astonish
😆 How can you expect me to think what ACP thought...while ACP and Abhijeet both were the writers creation.. Anyways.. If I was the writer of the story... then like i said before ACP would be sure that Abhijeet was innocent and blood test was just to prove that he is not guilty.
Originally posted by: astonish
Its people;s will and wish to worship Rama.. But for me.. he is not worth worshipping... He is someone who suspected his wife??? He didn't have faith in his wife..!!! Shouldn';t sita get a doubt that when she was at Raavan's place.. Ram could have romanced other ladies... Could Ram prove his innocence??? Never..!!!! he could never do.. then how did he expect Sita to prove that she is pure???
Now tell me Asto...why do you think Ram suspected Seeta? Why don't you look at it in a positive way and realise that Ram too never suspected Seeta and the Agni Pareeksha was just to satisfy the public.
Asto - The 'great king' never doubted his wife. Why I brought in CID was to show you that you can explain a similar incident in a positive way too...because you know the character called ACP better and you know that in his heart he will not suspect Abhijeet. As an ACP of CID he has to show proof to his seniors and the public that Abhijeet is innocent and hence the blood test.
Similarly, Rama was a king - a public figure. The public expect the first lady to have a clean image. She is supposed to be a role model for the other women in the country. Hence Rama had to prove to the public that his wife is chaste in whatever was the accepted method followed those days.
https://youtu.be/CJfYpL-4pVY?si=UFyIdyamGWqHY2bt Sony posted this week promo....Looking interesting But Pankaj changed his hair cut 😀
Just last week parth shared a bts where he is fully drenched and there are some visible injuries on his face. but this scend never came and last...
3