Originally posted by: Kittya_Cullen
Well first of all thank you Misti! As always very insightful! You are welcome and thank you.
Now for the annoyances 🤓
The scenes have improved in comparison to before. Frankly anything with less Bharka is a pleasure. It's rather unfortunate and extreme that they are degrading a god like this for entertainment (faulty writing skills, definitely not as good yours😆). Back to a serious note. It makes no sense that Maheshwari of all people would: 1) Hurt herself just to stay in the house-it's not like her character. 2)That scene last week of her grovelling at Bharka's feet screams ridiculous. She would never do this.
3) Suggesting that a god would ever tell someone to hurt herself is absolutely blasphemous. No god would fall to petty human tricks like that!😡
In summary, Maheshwari was always depicted as a very strong villain. She always had intelligence, and most definitely alot of pride. It is not in collaboration with her character to grovel or hurt herself, even to gain smething by it. She would more than likely have put Bharka in her place from the inception, or atleast avoided all her problems with some intelligent and sarcastic dialogues. Maheshwari to me was never intelligent...she was clever but more than that she has always been reactive. They did mess with the screenplay during the 12 years leap because that was the time I couldnot understand Maheshwari...I mean they showed her extremely reactive person before the leap and then they showed that no one guessed her incompetency...it is not possible for a reactive person to hide their true nature. Now I have put down that phase as when people where awareas to what she is but since they are status conscious they did not think that it is their right to question her...at home Padma kept quiet becase it was serving her purpose and anyway Padmaonlyprotests when her security is in question.
It's good to see Devbabu thinking, but why would they even allow Kahna to suggest that Bharka and Devbabu share a plate? Kahna doesn't accept their marriage and while this may have been to depict Devbabu's developing character, they could have done this some other way. Yes they could have and it is the creatives way to show how people can think that they are a couple. I let that be because compared to what they are doing to Kanha and his dilagues this was nothing.
Lastly, Rohan has always been another strong villain. So I'm happy to see that they left atleast one character with his original brains. Yes I am actually relieved here...he is a very strong villian Bharka should be more afraid of him though. She thinks too much of herself and is over confident After all, she had kidnapped him and tortured him. (While I was very happy to see those few scenes😆, it was then that I realised Bharka had turned evil 😒), which means Rohan has power to bring her down. He can prove that she was capable of that, therefore ultimately she should be far capable of even "eviler" deeds. Yes the kidnapping phase was when I started thinking that Barkha is negative. As for the kidnapping yes he can show all that but people might take it as Barkha trying to help her friend so that Radhika gets married to Dev. Lets see how they handle this part.
All in all, great acting by our favourites!! And some of our not so favourite.
Kudoos to Avinash for doing so much with so little. This shows that he has great adaptability as an actor.Yes...Avinash has been using his expressions as a means to let the audience know his feeligs...he is a very good actor.
Once again, fabulous analysis Misti!!thanks.
Cricket
Anupamaa
