Aryan Khan Case Discussion ~For the People Who Want a Rationale Debate - Page 12

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Sorry again you have not provided a valid citation. I'm specifically looking for the argument YOU made wherein both need not be in same custody to be interrogated together.

You can call it your assumption as well and we can close the argument.

Of course. A judgment which states that interrogation doesn’t change the nature of custody is not a valid citation because we believe what we wish to believe, I am closing this argument from my side unless you come up with something to validate your claim that nature of custody needs to be the same for confrontation or in other words interrogation changes the nature of custody.
Why don’t you prove me wrong?

Originally posted by: NoraSM

Of course. A judgment which states that interrogation doesn’t change the nature of custody is not a valid citation because we believe what we wish to believe, I am closing this argument from my side unless you come up with something to validate your claim that nature of custody needs to be the same for confrontation or in other words interrogation changes the nature of custody.
Why don’t you prove me wrong?

Sorry again.. when you feel other side is making ridiculous and absolutely illogical argument you can end the debate for your own sanity. Be happy in your world thay you got the win jn the debate.

My entire argument is based on they need confronted together. It's an assumption itself. I can't substiante this in itself how why do I waste my time looking to substantiate an assumption which is already based on an assumption.

First I was booted out of that thread without even being heard. Was also ridiculed for making a new thread and inviting just 4 members.

Then member of that group wanted to join one by one.

We without any prejudice allowed anyone and everyone to join in, only for to be called out things again.(one post was already deleted, and the other can be seen above)

Sorry to give my sanity a preference. Anyone from that group isn't allowed to join in anymore and those who are already part of are free to leave.

Thank you.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

First I was booted out of that thread without even being heard. Was also ridiculed for making a new thread and inviting just 4 members.

Then member of that group wanted to join one by one.

We without any prejudice allowed anyone and everyone to join in, only for to be called out things again.(one post was already deleted, and the other can be seen above)

Sorry to give my sanity a preference. Anyone from that group isn't allowed to join in anymore and those who are already part of are free to leave.

Thank you.

Hats off to your patience, man!

Just report anyone who is not a member and giving us gyaan here... I can help you with that...

Originally posted by: TheMinion

Hats off to your patience, man!

Just report anyone who is not a member and giving us gyaan here... I can help you with that...

I think time has come to finaly use that report button.

Minion I'm really thankful for you to be the member and contributing in the thread. Otherwise it would have seemed I'm all alone talking to the walls of the thread.

Originally posted by: Zeal17

I think time has come to finaly use that report button.

Minion I'm really thankful for you to be the member and contributing in the thread. Otherwise it would have seemed I'm all alone talking to the walls of the thread.

Oh, come on...

I was interested in knowing what was all the hullabaloo about and I have an attention span of 5 pages 😃... so, this thread is perfect for me... thank you too!

Originally posted by: Zeal17

I think time has come to finaly use that report button.

Minion I'm really thankful for you to be the member and contributing in the thread. Otherwise it would have seemed I'm all alone talking to the walls of the thread.

I love to participate actively in this thread Zeal. but I'm unwell, so not able to concentrate on things properly. and argue karne ki energy bhi nahi hain. I will participate as soon as my health improves.

but my suggestion is, you post what you know/understand, there is no need to clarify things to people who want to see with fans eyes only. and don't bang your head against wall.

Originally posted by: TheMinion

Hasini, Zeal… great posts 👍🏻 I wasn’t aware of 9 independent witnesses… so these people can have political background too?

And FINALLY somebody addressed these grown ass people as “Young Men” and not “kids” 😂

btw that NCP guy who blamed NCB in press meet, he has his own agenda. NCB held his son in law in Mumbai drug trafficking case.

Originally posted by: NoraSM

1 If it was a rave party then how come they arrest Aryan and Arbaaz from the dock and ship was allowed to sail after it and party was allowed to continue? Rave party means everyone or most came their for consumption, 1300 people on the ship, how come only 11 arrested and 3 were allowed to leave within hours, one of those 3 being Pratik Gaba, who extended the invitation to Aryan Khan.

2 NCB lawyer said How can all of these 8 people be at the same place, just because Aryan didn't have drugs on him doesn't mean these 8 people being together is a coincidence

3 Arbaaz named Achit and there were one year old chats between Aryan, NCB says Achit is a supplier but they didn't even ask for Achit's further remand, in fact they didn't even attend court to seek his remand and this Achit was the reason they wanted Aryan’s further custody.

I don't know about NCB laws. how can I explain things I don't know. and I am very poor in writing fictions. Sorry.

Originally posted by: hasini009

btw that NCP guy who blamed NCB in press meet, he has his own agenda. NCB held his son in law in Mumbai drug trafficking case.

Yeah... the less said about NCP, the better! 😂

And, gel well soon Hasini... take care...