SidNaaz Unlimited CC 5|Sid: Why Label the Relationship? [Invites Only] - Page 21

Originally posted by: Ritzie

Where did you read it?

The guy who posted pic with sid told me

Originally posted by: lovepooo

Maybe sana na ho kyunki wo 4 bje toh set se free hui thi

This was yesterday pic not Friday

https://twitter.com/Rieeu2/status/1236675727103164416?s=20

Originally posted by: jyoti06

Usko sana ka photo dikha do koi 😆 But i think its difficult to see the face if windows r closed

He watched bb also🤣phir bhi he cant say 🤣

Originally posted by: Luvpari345

https://twitter.com/_anaa_i/status/1236716815859863552?s=21

One of my absolute fav mini patchup 🥺❤️

Originally posted by: Luvpari345

He watched bb also🤣phir bhi he cant say 🤣

Ughhh then how does know gori thi? 🤣

Originally posted by: jyoti06

Whether sid had privacy clause or not ,channel deliberately stopped showing sid's side of love after they planned this swayambar show ..Since then they started building the whole narrative of one sided love bec of which sana will hunt fr a groom next ..

And its not like we r assuming things ..Sid himself says in his latest TOI interview that "itna maine life mein kisiko nahi manaya jitna sana ko manaya hai " ..But how much of sid manaoing sana we saw in show ? Sid in delhi interview said that reason of his cigarette dialogue was bec sana in morning used to get upset if she saw him sitting with someone else and then his whole day used to go behind manaofying sana and if she used to get upset , i too got affected ...How much of that whole day manaofying by sid was shown in episode ??

Even bagga in interview said its mutual as what we saw on tv was just sana ka side but in reality sid used to put up equal efforts which was never shown ..

So irrespective of privacy clause or not, channel.played the nasty game of showing it one sided and after a point even sidnaaz might hv been informed about it in house itself bec by that time everyone knew about msk show in bb house itself ..Now it makes sense why sid said " i hate u ..uska opposite" and when sana said direct ILU bol , sid ka reply was " yaha aisa nahi bol sakta na " ..it all makes sense now ..

That is one possibility and quite strong one..

Channel suddenly changed whole narrative since that jealousy weekend.. It was quite fishy. Even Salman wasnt too happy with channel and even hinted it to siddharth how all this is being projected on that weekend..

Originally posted by: jyoti06

Whether sid had privacy clause or not ,channel deliberately stopped showing sid's side of love after they planned this swayambar show ..Since then they started building the whole narrative of one sided love bec of which sana will hunt fr a groom next ..

And its not like we r assuming things ..Sid himself says in his latest TOI interview that "itna maine life mein kisiko nahi manaya jitna sana ko manaya hai " ..But how much of sid manaoing sana we saw in show ? Sid in delhi interview said that reason of his cigarette dialogue was bec sana in morning used to get upset if she saw him sitting with someone else and then his whole day used to go behind manaofying sana and if she used to get upset , i too got affected ...How much of that whole day manaofying by sid was shown in episode ??

Even bagga in interview said its mutual as what we saw on tv was just sana ka side but in reality sid used to put up equal efforts which was never shown ..

So irrespective of privacy clause or not, channel.played the nasty game of showing it one sided and after a point even sidnaaz might hv been informed about it in house itself bec by that time everyone knew about msk show in bb house itself ..Now it makes sense why sid said " i hate u ..uska opposite" and when sana said direct ILU bol , sid ka reply was " yaha aisa nahi bol sakta na " ..it all makes sense now ..

Originally posted by: Luvpari345

This was yesterday pic not Friday

Wasn’t sana with vikas gupta yesterday morning?

Originally posted by: jyoti06

Whether sid had privacy clause or not ,channel deliberately stopped showing sid's side of love after they planned this swayambar show ..Since then they started building the whole narrative of one sided love bec of which sana will hint fr a groom next ..

And its not like we r assuming things ..Sid himself says in his latest TOI interview that "itna maine life mein kisiko nahi manaya jitna sana ko manaya hai " ..But how much of sid manaoing sana we saw in show ? Sid in delhi interview said that reason of his cigarette dialogue was bec sana in morning used to get upset if she saw him sitting with someone else and then his whole day used to go behind manaofying sana and if she used to get upset , i too got affected ...How much of that whole day manaofying by sid was shown in episode ??

Even bagga in interview said its mutual as what we saw on tv was just sana ka side but in reality sid used to put up equal efforts which was never shown ..

So irrespective of privacy clause or not, channel.played the nasty game of showing it one sided and after a point even sidnaaz might hv been informed about it in house itself bec by that time everyone knew about msk show in bb house itself ..Now it makes sense why sid said " i hate u ..uska opposite" and when sana said direct ILU bol , sid ka reply was " yaha aisa nahi bol sakta na " ..it all makes sense now ..

Yes this is what I think also . They wanted a narrative for their next show . And i know they were after sid also to sign up for msk . SO maybe they thought they will show one sided and then in msk climax sid would propose

About the scene u discussed wendy , if I have understood it they wont telecast such things as it will cause a public uproar . SId's opponents would have made things difficult for sid . All moralists and feminists wld be up in arms . as even at 10.30 it was family audiences . Already there were so many opinions about sidnaaz .

Also if such things happen in heat f the moment , the actor can request channel not to telecast it and they may or may not agree . To sid they must have agreed as he was the main pillar .