::Sunny Side Up::#3{Strictly Invite Only} - Page 36

Originally posted by: SoreThumb

It doesn't matter what her reasons were Ecri..the fact of the matter is, she didn't want to be more than friends and probably wasn't comfortable with his over friendliness and didn't reciprocate

That shld have been it

There was no reason for juvenile behaviour and indirectly instigating fans who were ready to pounce on her for their shirtless heart-throb

Women can be the worst enemies to have..esp when they are demeaning you for a man they fancy/adore/love

Originally posted by: chicksoup

👍🏼

What the reasons were ,also were blurted out by the hero.

I hope someday he realises how juvenile he was.

Originally posted by: chicksoup

ST and Dey,

I still don't get how the male heir works as justification for Satrupa. It is just a part of a Patriarch's orthodox thinking. His wife and best friend seem quite bewildered by it, so it gets with the story.

Just when they thought all problems related to the heir could be solved with Anami, Vik comes up with another road block in the name of male heir.

Vik just seems to be acting as a difficult old man, and it looks convincing to me.

Satrupa will not listen to Gayatri, who wants her to bond with Anami and take her away from Nar. So she decides a college education can do wonders, even if the girl might continue hating her.

Will we see the same struggle we saw with Baldev and Satrupa bickering over Vatsalya? Satrupa was ambitious then too, and Baldev had to point it out to her that V was just a child.

I find the characterisations intact.

Originally posted by: SoreThumb

Oh and a very important question: have they changed Anju Mahendru's wig

It just looks different

Originally posted by: Ecrivain.

Originally posted by: SoreThumb

Originally posted by: chicksoup

ST and Dey,

I still don't get how the male heir works as justification for Satrupa. It is just a part of a Patriarch's orthodox thinking. His wife and best friend seem quite bewildered by it, so it gets with the story.

Because it provides Satrupa with a reason for having giving up the female child..that she chose Vatsalya over Anami coz Vatsalya had a future in Lal Mahal and not Anami thanks to Vikrams thoughts..and this reasoning has suddenly been introduced whereas beforehand there were no signs of any such parampara mentioned by Vikram

Just when they thought all problems related to the heir could be solved with Anami, Vik comes up with another road block in the name of male heir.

Vik just seems to be acting as a difficult old man, and it looks convincing to me.

Satrupa will not listen to Gayatri, who wants her to bond with Anami and take her away from Nar. So she decides a college education can do wonders, even if the girl might continue hating her.

She does want Anami to not hate her..but doesn't want to work towards that 😕

Will we see the same struggle we saw with Baldev and Satrupa bickering over Vatsalya? Satrupa was ambitious then too, and Baldev had to point it out to her that V was just a child.

Yes but she could expect Vatsalya to listen to her..

Does she even have a moral right on Anami..why does she expect her to behave the way she wants her to

I find the characterisations intact.

Originally posted by: Dreamer-89