Have loads to catch up from 3 days...Just finished 2 epi of MB..
Have to watch 3 episodes of BV, 1 epi of MP, 1 long epi of 24..
Anybody can give me a brief update what happened in BV land and in intellectual land ?
😳
Big Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - Aug 29, 2025
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 29 Aug 2025 EDT
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 30 Aug 2025 EDT
MAIRAs SCHOOL 29.8
MAIRA KNOWS 30.8
Param Sundari opens well
Aneet and Ahaan on the cover of THR!!
Abhira : The self-respect queen
Geetanjali Saree look
Throw back! When katrina did not take 'gentle' gently from Shah!
Anupamaa 29 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Deepika Ranveer At Ambani Ganpati Festival
Monsoon Magic Micro-fiction Contest Felicitation Ceremony
Cannot decide who is most annoying
Bullying in the first week?
Ijja-jjat hai
Nazar laga hua anda mein nahi khaata
Unseen bollywood pics
Trailer - Do You Wanna Partner - Tamannaah Bhatia Diana Penty
Queen 2 Tanu Weds Manu 3 Get Rolling
Originally posted by: Hiral_Halwa
Why so formal anjy 😕 edited it...sorry
Merrit and competency are important but it is equally important that members from maximum no of states be included giving the feel that people from all states are part of government given our diversity.I have questions, maybe too idealistic but need inputs all the same:
I have been hearing a lot about cabinet minsters and representations from various states etc. etc.Question is this (especially in a scenario where a ruling party has full majority and there is no need for appeasement politics):When a person becomes a cabinet minister and is given a portfolio, should it matter which state he/she comes from.Should not merit and competency override this state-wise distribution of portfolios.Should it not be the duty of that minister to look after the interests of all the states as if they were all his own.Should he give preferential treatment to the state to which he belongs.Why should states that have no minister in the center feel insecure and disheartened? If there are national issues to be addressed in that/those states, should they not be taken up with the same priority and zeal.
I have questions, maybe too idealistic but need inputs all the same:
I have been hearing a lot about cabinet minsters and representations from various states etc. etc.Question is this (especially in a scenario where a ruling party has full majority and there is no need for appeasement politics):When a person becomes a cabinet minister and is given a portfolio, should it matter which state he/she comes from.Should not merit and competency override this state-wise distribution of portfolios.Should it not be the duty of that minister to look after the interests of all the states as if they were all his own.Should he give preferential treatment to the state to which he belongs.Why should states that have no minister in the center feel insecure and disheartened? If there are national issues to be addressed in that/those states, should they not be taken up with the same priority and zeal.
Ajabde and Pratap help Phool practice for competition. On the day of competition, JB doesn't let go Ajabdee in open arena but Dheerbhai taking an opportunity send Ajabdee to the arena where Ajabde with great force breaks statuette. On the other hand Jaivantabai goes tand tries to explain Udai Singh where Udai Singh speaks up that he is doing all this just to secure Rajputana unity from Akbar.
Phool is extremely happy thinking she won the competition. On the other hand Akbar and Bairam Khan comes to King Yavatlal and kill him as he denies their friendship. Pratap practicing in Akhada were Jaivantabai comes and explains him that Ajabde too likes him, this makes Pratap extremely happy.
Phool gets angry on the other princesses as they told her about Pratap getting married to Ajabde but Ajabde consoles her. Dheerbhai makes Uday Singh go to Ajabde to as for a sacrifice for the sake of Rajputra.
==
sony tv gives weekly synopsis only-not daily ones