Chandra Nandini 101-105: Dhai rang prem ke - Page 22

Originally posted by: liberty2

Women of that era, were a bit trendy, 😆they wear nail polish, heels. So may be a consmetic surgery. 😉

Originally posted by: AJSharma79

From the beginning of this show I have never seen even a single hint of Jalal in Chandra. Rajat is truly blessed in his arts. A very convincing and clever actor. I think he does method acting, where you imagine/turn yourself into the character and mentally tune yourself as the character. Like voluntarily giving yourself a split personality.

Jalal was arrogant, bullish, and had the whole space he occupy be about him, before Jodha turn him into somewaht of a lapdog. Even after that, he was confident and shrewd. And he was always the EMPEROR. There was no doubt about it. Any space he walks, he emanates the power.

Chandra was on the opposite pole. He was vulnerable, humble, polite and he blends into the space he occupy. He does not stand out as the man with power, because he himself does not realise how powerful he is.

And there is so much difference in the body language too. Jalal always came across as hard - chest out, powerful strides, straight back and strong voice. Chandra is softer. Though he does not hunch he keeps himself low. His paces are fast but not powerful. And his voice is sort of singsong.

Jalal was a man of supreme authority, and Chandra is a boy of undiscovered potential

It is amazing how a single actor brings 2 completely different person on the screen.

Originally posted by: skamunugama

Yes aish, there is no jalal and there never was. Rajat pulls off the difference of the two characters splendidly.👏

His change of expressions during her death and ones Nandini got her life back was magnificent to me and it was like, as Aunty mentioend in her JA posts many times , he has a micro-meter in his head. Seems he has upgraded that to a nano-meter while being developed and differentiated into Chandra's character.

Must say aunty and you are absolutely correct on this... nano or micro...this man has something in his mind, which others don't have

During nandini''s ji bhar ke rona scene the grief , the suffering was clearly reflected in chandra's eyes where one can feel nandini's pain in them but not in her weep.

completely agree

...and I wish nandini gets over from her grief soon.SBP isn't doing a great job here...though good thing is she is ticking to underplaying

want to give him a tight 🤗... for his performences 😉

are you sure just for performance...nothing with those killer looks😉

Originally posted by: Sabdabhala

AUNTY/ANNE/AISHWARYA

MY REFERENCE TO JALAL MAZAAR SCENE AFTER JODHA DIES OF POISON AND HE BRINGS HER BACK TO LIFE WAS NOT AT TO HINT THAT CHANDRA SHOWS JALAL LIKE HINTS OR THAT HE SHOULD REPEAT THE SAME ACTIONS/EXPRESSIONS

IT WAS MERELY A REQUEST TO THE CVS TO VISUALIZE AND CONSTRUCT A SCENE OF SIMILAR CALIBRE

I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU AISHWARYA AND ANNE, WHEN YOU SAY THAT THERE IS NO HIMT OF JALAL IN CHANDRA

WHY SHOULD THERE EVEN BE?? THE TWO CHARACTERS ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT IN BACKGROUND, UPBRINGING AND CIRCUMSTANCES ETC, SO THERE IS HARDLY A REQUIREMENT FOR SIMILARITY

AND I HAVE ALWAYS MAINTAINED THAT WHILE WE TALK ABOUT ACTORS WHO BRING OUT VARIETY IN ROLES OF DIFFERENT GENRES, RAJAT HAS EXCELLED IN BRINGING OUT THIS VARIETY WITHIN THE GENRE OF HISTORCIALS, AND WONDERFULLY AT THAT

ALL I WANTED WAS THAT THE CVS HANDLE THIS SCENE WITH A SIMILAR SENSIBILITY AS IT WAS HANDLED IN JA, WITH THE HOPE THAT RAJAT GETS A FEW MINUTES TO COMPLETELY BOWL US OVER WITH HIS PERFORMANCE

YES HE ALWAYS DOES THAT - BOWL US OVER REPEATEDLY, BUT YET THAT SCENE IN JA WAS ONE OF HIS SUPERIOR SCENES IN THE SHOW

AND OF COURSE, WHAT WE GOT WAS A SORT OF A BOTCHED UP AND HURRIED SCENE, WHERE NANDINI DYING ACTUALLY LOOKED LIKE A WRONG DIAGNOSIS BY THE VAIDYA 😆

I FEEL CVS COULD HAVE TAKEN A LITTLE MORE TIME AND MADE IT A BETTER VISUAL EXPERIENCE

WHEN SHWETA GETS EXTRA SCREEN SPACE AS BOTH NANDINI AND ROOPA, CVS SHOULD GIVE RAJAT TOO SUCH OPPORTUNITIES TO GET SOME XTRA SCREEN SPACE. EVER SINCE THE WAR AND THE EMERGENCE OF TOO MANY LADIES, THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED

Originally posted by: Sabdabhala

AUNTY/ANNE/AISHWARYA

MY REFERENCE TO JALAL MAZAAR SCENE AFTER JODHA DIES OF POISON AND HE BRINGS HER BACK TO LIFE WAS NOT AT TO HINT THAT CHANDRA SHOWS JALAL LIKE HINTS OR THAT HE SHOULD REPEAT THE SAME ACTIONS/EXPRESSIONS

IT WAS MERELY A REQUEST TO THE CVS TO VISUALIZE AND CONSTRUCT A SCENE OF SIMILAR CALIBRE

@bold: I completely agree you on this lavi. Its high time CVs buckled up. After Chandini's marriage (the first one) ...nothing has happened which can be termed as hard hitting ...though they had plenty of chances. So many major events took place but by the time you realize they are already over.

I FULLY AGREE WITH YOU AISHWARYA AND ANNE, WHEN YOU SAY THAT THERE IS NO HIMT OF JALAL IN CHANDRA

WHY SHOULD THERE EVEN BE?? THE TWO CHARACTERS ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT IN BACKGROUND, UPBRINGING AND CIRCUMSTANCES ETC, SO THERE IS HARDLY A REQUIREMENT FOR SIMILARITY

there is..., it comes from ekta...things are bound to recycle. The scene where Jodha drinks poison is taken from Kasuti zindagi ki. So, while no matter how different the backdrop of a character is...he/she is bound to go through same circumstances, turmoils and hardships. look at the whole "mere paas hriday nahin hai" of chandra ...while" I don't believe in love" is still fine...this whole hriday saga is just a desperate attempt to redoing a jalal. What rajat is doing becomes more remarkable because he does that in ekta's world.

AND I HAVE ALWAYS MAINTAINED THAT WHILE WE TALK ABOUT ACTORS WHO BRING OUT VARIETY IN ROLES OF DIFFERENT GENRES, RAJAT HAS EXCELLED IN BRINGING OUT THIS VARIETY WITHIN THE GENRE OF HISTORCIALS, AND WONDERFULLY AT THAT

ALL I WANTED WAS THAT THE CVS HANDLE THIS SCENE WITH A SIMILAR SENSIBILITY AS IT WAS HANDLED IN JA, WITH THE HOPE THAT RAJAT GETS A FEW MINUTES TO COMPLETELY BOWL US OVER WITH HIS PERFORMANCE

Rajat got few minutes only lavi😡 Through out the man has given such a brilliant performance improvising just the right things at just the right time...and the editor edited them at just the ..oh! well right time...just for the sake of horribly moronic face of magadh waasis

YES HE ALWAYS DOES THAT - BOWL US OVER REPEATEDLY, BUT YET THAT SCENE IN JA WAS ONE OF HIS SUPERIOR SCENES IN THE SHOW

I don't get it...if your talking about the dargah scene then nothing like this happened in the show., so we can't really compare. And if it is about bringing her back from the clutches of death (though both of us agree she really wasn't dead😆) then I liked this one better.

But i do agree...dargah one is alltogether on a different level..and at this point I don't really expect CN CVs of being capable of penning down something like that...so we will have to wait I guess

AND OF COURSE, WHAT WE GOT WAS A SORT OF A BOTCHED UP AND HURRIED SCENE, WHERE NANDINI DYING ACTUALLY LOOKED LIKE A WRONG DIAGNOSIS BY THE VAIDYA 😆

I FEEL CVS COULD HAVE TAKEN A LITTLE MORE TIME AND MADE IT A BETTER VISUAL EXPERIENCE

WHEN SHWETA GETS EXTRA SCREEN SPACE AS BOTH NANDINI AND ROOPA, CVS SHOULD GIVE RAJAT TOO SUCH OPPORTUNITIES TO GET SOME XTRA SCREEN SPACE. EVER SINCE THE WAR AND THE EMERGENCE OF TOO MANY LADIES, THIS HAS NOT HAPPENED

Originally posted by: aishwish

Originally posted by: skamunugama