Chandra Nandini 21-22: Plot on a gallop! - Page 2

He would do another David. Or perhaps use him for Adam in the Sistine Chapel ceiling painting about the Creation.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Fantastic post Aunty 👍🏼 I enjoyed reading your post more than the episode ... i was bored watching the episode, the only saving grace was rajat tokas ... im just holding on for him

Thank you for the awesome post and analysis Shyamala aunty

Hi aunty.

Aunty, the story is actually whistling past at rocket speed in order to launch the love story waiting in the wings. I am not sorry to have been wrong in the order of Pathnis as I am by the fact that none of Chandra's marriages are happening because he wants them or out of his own choice.

Helena-political reasons; Durdhara- I suppose either to save her from another undesirable marriage with a loafer, drunkard and wife-beating husband arranged by her father(or) Chanakya asks him to for the sake of an Indian heir(or) Durdhara is in love with him and he is ready for compromise to keep her happy; Nandini- political marriage.

I always knew Helena was self-centered. But I never thought she will ask Chandra to attack her own father. Unsuspected depths!

I will care only about the story from now on and not stand as a Daniel to Judgement decrying the ahistoricity of the script for bringing the Greek war before and pushing the War with the Nandas later on. I kiss you a goodbye History!

The roti bit finally came up. But the way the woman was taking Chanakya's war strategy apart piece by piece, it looked as though she was the war strategy professor from Taxilla giving a lecture to her grandson/son and two outstanding students(Chandra and Chanakya). In the original story she doesn't do all this analysis. She just mentions Chanakya's name.

Aunty my mood is plainly off. The voice dubbing thread is really bugging me off. I wish people would make up their mind why they are criticizing Rajat. They think his acting is bad? (or) his voice is bad?(or) his height is bad? (or) he is choosing to do only historicals and not choosing to do a variety of roles? Rajat makes CN worth watching, and reading to some of the criticism in that thread, people who would not have watched or seen Rajat acting, will automatically assume that he is a visual and auditory horror inflicted on the hapless viewers by merciless CVs and Ekta Kapoor.

Originally posted by: shailusri1983

Aunty my mood is plainly off. The voice dubbing thread is really bugging me off. I wish people would make up their mind why they are criticizing Rajat. They think his acting is bad? (or) his voice is bad?(or) his height is bad? (or) he is choosing to do only historicals and not choosing to do a variety of roles? Rajat makes CN worth watching, and reading to some of the criticism in that thread, people who would not have watched or seen Rajat acting, will automatically assume that he is a visual and auditory horror inflicted on the hapless viewers by merciless CVs and Ekta Kapoor.

That was a very enjoyable read, aunty 😃 In many portions, your prose reads like poetry ❤️ The parts about romantic postures and bookbinding blunders were hilarious 😆 I also loved the Medea and Jason section :) Beautifully narrated.

Originally posted by: kautilya04

That was a very enjoyable read, aunty 😃 In many portions, your prose reads like poetry ❤️ The parts about romantic postures and bookbinding blunders were hilarious 😆 I also loved the Medea and Jason section :) Beautifully narrated.

Sorry for the short comment. I'm a little engrossed with some writing, and my mind is refusing to focus on anything else until the task is done 😡😆 Can't blame it . The poor thing has very limited capacity 😆