Originally posted by: .FemmeFatale.
One thing I would like to mention. If playing historical shows (correction to those who do not know-mythology and history are two different words) is monotonous,then how is only playing 'modern' shows not monotonous?
The fact of the matter is variation is in terms of characterisation,not the environment in which the character is.
All of Rajat's characters were different in terms of behavior.
PRC was more or less Mr.Goody two shoes.
His next character Veer was a playful,charming boy who transforms into a responsible leader,when he realizes he is not of royal blood and considered a messiah of the harijans.
He then played Jalal,vicious and wile at first who has a change of heart over time. Jalal only had hatred for everything except power before but then he changes.
Now comes Chandragupt. He is the ideal student. Ambitious,very goal oriented. Doesn't like distractions. Considers emotions a distraction,but unconsciously understands emotions much better than others.
And please enlighten me,Nevla is a shape-shifter mangoose right? I'm not sure there is a specific way in which one can execute something which is imaginary.😆
Not that anyone is interested,but he also has a different body language in each of the shows.
I didn't watch much of Naagin,because supernatural shows are not my cup of tea. I like historicals. And do maybe others like modern shows. Doesn't make any of us superior or inferior. When one doesn't like something,one just ignores it. Simple as that.