Hi, I'm Shailaja. This was a very interesting take on CN till now. I too like Avantika's character a lot despite the sorry beginning they gave her. I differ a bit on Nand. Malay is a true cartoon, Nand is not. He can be pretty menacing and give the creeps. They have mellowed him down a lot in showing his fatherly side of the character that it looses its sting. It now seems that he is like a snake whose venom has been extracted. But that is not the case.
He can relapse any time into his wickedness. So I am still expecting the Badass from him during the final war sequences between him and Chandra. If at all he fails, he will not redeem himself even during his dying moments when he will pass on his hatred and venom to his daughter Nandini. I don't think he will be guilty or apologetic for whatever he has done even while dying.
Regarding Nandini, I have two theories. One, she might not be so good, innocent and virtuous at all. Seeing the kind of genes with which she is tagged with, on the one side Avantika and on the other side, Nand, it would actually be the eighth wonder in the world if she turned alright or an apostle of peace. It takes a great deal to shake off such a birth and upbringing in such an atmosphere. The only reason I can see why she did not turn out real bad or negative and remained essentially flawed must be due to the fact the Nand kept her out of most of his shady dealings.
But at the same time, we cannot say that she must be ignorant of her father's true character or been mistaken in her assessment of what kind of a king her father was.
She might have considered all this her divine right and privilege. She perhaps never had any issues with anything her father did, right or wrong, because a king is above law, and he is law himself. He can make or break any number of rules, and he is above any law or punishment and accountable to none kind of mentality.
This could be her growing up story, a Buildungs Roman! So love might actually force her to see what she never intends to see. It could make her give up her delusions and false pretensions and teach her to respect the intrinsic merit of individuals.
It could make her see that everyone is accountable for who he or she is at the moral and ethical level, and nobody can shrink from or run away from their duties and responsibilities. It could be her tale of shaking off her nature and nurture through the harsh experiences life teaches her.
She could be the kind of person Austen's Emma Woodhouse was, in some respects even worse and unfeeling. I have always seen the reformation of bad boys by supposedly good girls on Indian TV. For a change I would love to see a bad and flawed girl being reformed and transformed by a good boy. I want to see how Chandra and her love for him will actually help her rise up in love.
The second option, much simpler, she is a blinkered horse. She has a normal vision but sees only what her father shows her. To whatever aspects he does not show her, she stays practically blind.
Originally posted by: tejaswiniwenham
ah finally I am through catching upto the show AND your analysis aunty and can finally contribute to the discussions! ok so far the things i like about the story are ofcourse chanakya, rajat as usual is on point acting wise and chandra's character is actually shaping up to be focused and disciplined- a characteristic i find often missing in most heroes of these vaguely 'historical' fiction that indian tv has of late been obsessed with. they always make the heroes pettily arrogant or a hopeless lover boy who takes far too much interest in his household than any king of old wouldve ever had- which often simply takes away from the strength of their character and the intrigue of their journey and reduces it to mills and boons. i lack the taste and the patience for those "epic" romantic heroes unfortunately. so on that note a very good start.
however, i must confess that i have no love lost for most of the 'villains' of the show- starting from nand and his 'villain' laughter to malayketu (i hope thats the right name?)- they are such caricatures of villains- i mean its 2016 and we are still stuck with the male version of komolika with a ravan laughter lifted straight off of 1961 ramayan. but in contrast i absolutely LOVE avantika. she is wonderful, poised and dignified, both in her deceit and despair. you can tell she is royalty and nand is NOT- i dont know if the writers are far-sighted enough to have done that intentionally or not, but its striking. BUT unfortunately, you can also tell that NONE of her children are in the slightest bit royal, which brings me to our second titular character- nandini.
as you may recall from our PR days, i have a deep dislike of self-righteous characters who think themselves to be very clever. the only thing worse than an ignorant fool is one that insists that what they know is the 'right' knowledge. and nandini is just that. how a non mentally challenged woman in her teens can not know what a terrible king her father is, is beyond me, especially when her brothers and father are casually murdering people in their bhavan, it mayve been believable if nandini like princesses of her time stayed put in their quarters or gardens and didnt prance around everywhere, but now it just seems ridiculous. further, her 'fierceness' just comes off as an attitude problem- her haughtiness with those inferior to her social position is appalling and her scrappiness towards her 'equals' is just nerve grinding. her 'edge' doesnt make her cool or layered cos you know its all bark and no bite- in contrast to helena whom you can tell is a dangerous woman. I cant recall one scene where i have enjoyed her at all. C minus on the heroine.
it will inevitably be the story of how chandra shows her the reality and how she 'tames' him and shows him real love. well to me it seems the only one who needs taming is her and not through a love story but rather making her helena's maid wouldve do nicely. bottomline- indian tv is rife with silly loud mouthed 'chulbuli' girls and nandini is just one of them. and as for the premise of the story- what is with all this hate and trying to kill chandra and forced hate-love story? was it not fairly common in history to marry the daughter of the king the victor just slayed? werent princesses trained to accept such terms for peace? alexander himself did so! i dont understand why ekta has decided to make a show about an annoying fictional character and chandra! at most she can be the annoying second wife, the embittered helena of the recently ended ashok (that was an unbearable show on so MANY levels- even mohit raina couldnt save that storyline).
on that note, i must discuss helena and the apparent beef indian tv seems to have with this character. so far so good though, i actually like her character- she is fierce in her pride, love and loyalty. i see nothing wrong in her responses and unlike nandini she isnt a happy cloud of air-headed haughtiness. but soon enough she will be reduced to a ruqaiyya equivalent, yet another great empress reduced to komolika on tv. by all accounts helena was a significantly valued and trusted woman in CGM's life- he thus entrusted the kingdom to her and bindusar when he left it all. she was a great lover of indian culture and the greek version even claims that she (NAMED DIODARA NOT HELENA) and durdhara were but one and bindusar her child, some even claim a star crossed romance of two individuals whose great divide of family opposition, difference in religion, culture and historical animosity was overcome in love and CGM conquered her father for her hand. thus i find it difficult to understand why tv always portrays her as a resentful villain. and why ekta would go for the love story of a historically non-existent character and CGM to show some silly love hate story is also well beyond me- surely such a basic love story couldve been shown in a much less expensive setting! so im going to hope that the political intrigue of the story- which is genuinely very interesting and characters like chanakya, chandra and helena- oh! and a shout out to mura as well, shes a cool crazy queen- will be given enough screen space so that i can just ignore princess scrappy doo and still watch the show. once that ceases to be the case, it will be over and out for me with this as well!
PS: im so sorry to hear of your illness shyamala aunty! yes i was expecting back then, gosh it was so long back! my son's 3 now and i finally had a girl last year as well. my worst half, haha, is alright- busy so travelling a lot. ya i am the exact same way nowadays with tv shows, as it is a barely have time at all for them given im at work for ungodly hours and then with the kids for the rest. but i watch atleast 2 shows at a time right now im watching shakti and chandra-nandini. tried watching ishqbaaz for a bit but it got stale pretty quick.
Edited by shailusri1983 - 8 years ago