But EK needs to capture TRP now as it may not have taken a great start.
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 21 Aug 2025 EDT
DASHI FUTTT 21.8
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 22 Aug 2025 EDT
Out Now - Official Preview - The Ba***ds Of Bollywood
THAKELA LOVE 22.8
Book talk reading challenge September 2025 ~ Sign up open!
Chal jhooti; Shaadi ka Har nhi Fansi ka zehrila Fanda (pics only)
Media in India: Democracy’s Watchdog or Power’s Megaphone?
Mann main koi aur, shaadi se kisi aur
August disaster. Will Param Sundari save BW this month?
Anupamaa 21 Aug 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
Vivek Agnihotri - Nobody Should Name Their Child Taimur
Vivek Agnihotri Calls Maharashtrian food 'gareebon ka khana'
Proud Parents SRK-Gauri Watch Aryan 🥰
27 years of Dil Se
Danger - Param Sundari | Sidharth M, Janhvi K | SONG OUT
Originally posted by: jayaks02
as someone said, Swetha girl does sword fight with a lot of spunk. Unlike 😉 😆
Originally posted by: ---Khushi---
Yup...didn't look like "hopping-ho" to me😃& I also liked her toned & controlled angry expressions...thank heavens she doesn't "pop" her eyes almost out of her sockets😆😆😆
Originally posted by: ---Khushi---
Now this one's easy...it would be something like a mischievous imp, used for the female gender, right?😆Now wouldn't Miss Irene (my English teacher in school) be proud of Lil me??...*pats myself on the back* 😆
Originally posted by: Mallika-E-Bhais
Aunty: I do know the difference, aunty, but One is always protective when they love. Lol. I think I cannot listen to any criticism, even if it is warranted, when it comes to Rowling, Blyton, Milne & Dr Seuss. I miss my book-devouring.. Anyhow, Elizabeth Taylor?! I am forever, forever jealous of you now. She will always remain the most beautiful woman I've ever laid eyes on. <3 IFS is always, always glamorous & starry, wish I could join it too. Thank you for sharing, do share more.
https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/chandra-nandini/4731774/chandra-nandini-3-moonrise
Yes, young Chandra has lovely, light eyes. The steady gaze from them that is his forte, and the excellent lines (yes, I got the pun!) they have given him, help cover up his limitations as an actor.Originally posted by: BrienneOfTarth
This is such a fantastic post ! I came to IF after so long and I think I found my jackpot!😆
I've been watching CN from the start and am hoping for a good story.I love the way you write...um...may I call you Aunty? I am Ankita.😊Your post had me chuckling and choking over my breakfast this morning. Luckily I survived.Young Chandra has lovely eyes and even better lines. Ab peedha nahin hoti, ab abhyas ho chuka hai really was a poignant hit to my system. I am a sucker for good dialogues and this show seems to promise something along those lines, if you get the pun.😉The Mura Nand scene actually reminded me of Baahubali more than Ashokvatika. probably because Bahubali is more fresh in my memory. I think its quite cheeky of the director here. The widowed Ma of Bahubali waiting for her son to come exact vengeance and the widowed Mata Mura waiting for her Chandra to do the same...the similarities were unavoidable and the backdrop only accentuated that fact. Cheeky indeed.</div><div>I must mention that Alexander of CN had me in fits when I saw him first. Blue eyes, blonde hair, fair skin...all check. But why oh why was he butchering the Devnagri dialect (am I right?😕) to address a Greek army seven years prior to his invasion of Bharat?That transformed the entire speech from an omen to a parody.😆And yes, Amatyaji can give any Red Indian a run for his money. But I like it somehow.😆I have seen the Chandragupt serial of NDTV Imagine and Chanakya was a favourite of mine ever since. This version of the erudite brahmin does not disappoint so far.All I all, I am enjoying these initial episodes. Monday promises glimpses of RT n SBP as the older CN. I caught the last promo and I must say it added to my excitement.Hope to read more of such lovely posts in the future. If I manage to come, that is.😆Take care.
This one is Ekta's version, and one cannot say that it is not a researched one, but something that she has picked up at random, solely because she wants Rajat and his fan following to boost the show's TRPs. It is anything but that, and in fact there seems to be a lot going for it: the Piplavan kingdom, the overthrow of Shishunaag's dynasty by an unfaithful queen in cahoots with a lowly lover, and a daughter of a Nand - Padmanand ya Dhananand, antar kya hai aakhir? - marrying Chandragupta Maurya.
In fact, I was surprised to see so much "historicity", at least till now. They have even tied up the matter of the young Chandragupta being (raised as ) a sheperd boy quite neatly.
My comments on yours below are in blue. Many of the points made by you have been discussed in an interesting manner earlier in this thread, so do take a look at those posts if you have the time.
See you again soon.
Shyamala Aunty
Originally posted by: myviewprem
thanks a lot for the updates aunty
not watching it as of now but reading all your updateshopefully in a few weeks when things get settled i will venture to view itI did not like chandras father being shown as a drunkard who is after money etcany man who can shelter an orphaned baby chandra would have to been a selfless guy and such a man hitting his wife or his adopted son for a few pennies looks a bit tough to digestas per history he was a peackock herdsman - so he must have been a villager rearing peacocks etc and other birds for livelihood and they lived outside pataliputra in a forest area - obviously they were low castes who could not venture into city and lived away from society.Such a man just adopting a baby lying in his village abandoned and rearing him must be a good man if not great, but here they show him selfish and drunkard and wife beater
But this is not how his initial reaction is shown here. He calls the baby paap, and does not want it at all. It is the mother who insists on keeping it, and as he is not so brutish in those early days, he lets her do so. And there is nothing that says that a herdsman, of peacocks or anything else, living in a village, cannot be avaricious or become a drunkard.
This, however, is not the main point. The main point is that the abusive foster father, and the mother who not only takes all that beating but finds excuses for her brutish husband, together furnish an ironclad and extremely logical rationale for young Chandra's detesting the very mention of prem.Second thing i did not like was nandini behaving so innocent, even today's times kids who are 5-6 understand what is reality and who is acting or lying and in 300 BC etc girls were married off before 10 years old, 10-13 was ideal age of marriage in those times(because life span was short only 25-30 years), so girls were quiet mature than compared to 21st century. May be this was done to say that nandini hated chandra because she did not realize truth of her father and brothers later on and absolve her of any guilt or wrong in serial.
Well, she is shown as totally cocooned, to emphasise that she knew nothing. But when she is grown up, this explanation would hardly hold good.But i was wondering padmanand and his 7 sons are bad fine but chandra killed them all to become an emperor to establish an empire truly not really with an intention to relive magadha of terror(for that matter his own grandson ashoka and sushim were terror personified for magdha inmates in later years). So just creating a just empire was not chandras only objective else he would not conquer other kingdoms after nandas? Were all indian kings bad then? Not really a few were very bad, some ok, some good at all times. So chandra set out to create a powerful maurya empire(like akbar set out to create a powerful mughal empire) using sam dhand and bedh. So on nandini's part its ok as daughter of nanda to hate her family killer. But if she keeps hating how to make her hatred go away, so story writer uses bait of mura in jail by nandas and tortured for many years. In real history mura was never found after she abondoned chandra as baby. So how could nanda torture her?
See, , this is the same "real history" thing. It is pointless to cite it, especially when there are so many versions of the Chandragupta story.The other thing i found odd was a nanda begging mura to be his? - come on man that is 300 BC just own her, she will cry and crib does she have any option after that none? Did not kings just take away any woman they liked and keep in their harem without their approval? (even in 16th -17th century) YESso why is nanda begging to mura for years- because he loves her? a joke in those times love was not as it was in todays times that you will live and die for one woman and wait for her for ages neither was nanda shown as such a good man to believe his pleadings to her.
Not only have I touched on this point in my posts, but several others have discussed this psychological point earlier in this thread. I do not want to summarise their takes here, but they are very plausible,and you should take a look at them, especially those of Shailaja and Sandhya. It is not his love for Mura, it is something quite different.
Originally posted by: sashashyam
My dear Ankita,
Yes, of course you may, call me Aunty, that is. What an original id you have! Is it by any chance the name of a character from Game of Thrones, which I have avoided totally?
Your breathless post was most entertaining, and your compliment to mine most flattering.- I have never before had a post of mine hailed as a jackpot!😉 I am delighted, above all, that you enjoyed the funny bits (including, hopefully, the one about the dentist's chair!) so much.
Seeing that this one pleased you, you might also take a look at Chandra Nandini 3: Moonrise, which is athttps://www.indiaforums.com/forum/chandra-nandini/4731774/chandra-nandini-3-moonrise
Yes, young Chandra has lovely, light eyes. The steady gaze from them that is his forte, and the excellent lines (yes, I got the pun!) they have given him, help cover up his limitations as an actor.
As for Alexander, the funny thing is that they always show him as blonde and blue-eyed, whereas the the truth is that most Macedonians, and Greeks as a whole are dark haired and dark eyed.
As for "lifts" from Bahubali, which too I have not seen, they seem to be multiplying by the episode!
Amatya Rakshas could also stand in for on of the Star Trek characters. Even a Star Wars one.
OK. This is it for now. I hope to see more of you on my threads. As for your managing to come, that is up to you!
Shyamala Aunty