Posted:
Nivedita-Sid are mere humans, who were big-mouth about love and it is proved yesterday that they never had any love for each other, as they very easily moved on in life holding the hands of other partners. For both, marriage is important, partner is not so important...
But I'ld really like to throw this question to Shri Rajan Shahi and his story writer that are they making fun of Radha-Krishna love story along with Ram Sita? What was the need to bring in the concept of Radha-Krishna for Sid-Nivi and then showing the idol of Ram-Sita for Viren Nivi. Pehaps the creatives have forgotten, that Krishna or Ram both symbolises the eternal Vishnu and Radhna or Seeta are embodiments of Mata Laxmi. Perhaps they are showing that for Nivedita, Sid was her Krishna and Viren is her Ram, what concept are they throwing to the audience? Let God and Goddesses be out of the show, the concept of "ulte phere" be out of the show. Neither Nivedita nor Sid are worthy of uttering the concepts of Krishna or Ram. Do they really understand the life of Ram or Krishna? Why the show makers are bringing in Ram, Krishna, "ulte phere", Shiva, firegod and making fun of God and Goddesses, who are our sentiments. I was surprised to see that Hemlata praying to "Matadi" and asking for something and her wish is being fulfilled, that particular scene, the craetives showed that "evil prevails over goodness". When that old man Bhupat Sood is shedding buckets of tears that in his name all these are going on, a greedy person like Hemlata's wish is granted.
Today's article states, that Sid will move on as also Nivi, which is very much expected from both Sid and Nivi. Neither Nivi nor Sid are extraordinary persons to stand for their love or keep up their promises. Their efforts are to make them look "ever sacrificing"...my request to the creatives, show whatever you want...but please keep out Hindu mythology sentiments away by demeaning lovestories of Radhna-Krishna or Ram-Seeta or showing "evil wins over goodness". I am not worried about characters like Nivi Sid Viren Divya, but my blood bois when I see for these characters, examples of Radhna-Krishna, Ram-Seeta or "ulte pheres" are shown. Are these characters really worth it? do they really know these eternal love stories?
Today;s film makers show whatever they want...in Devdas, they show Paro and chandramukhi dancing together, in Parineeta they show consummation of marriage....and audience think these all are as per the original story...I feel viewers should really read the original articles before commenting like "consummation of marriage happened in Parineeta"....they need to know the original novel and articles...
Truth: another concept put forward by creatives...., who is following the path of truth in the show? noone...everyone is top to bottom fake in the show....
one thing, the creatives have atleast shown the rules of "Kaliyug"...where people are big mouth about their love but fail to stand by love during a slight storm...where a woman of substance have no "forgiving capability" and "shahanshilta" and can go to any extent for her obsessions....and the creatives will be so happy to prove that Divya's love is unconditional, completely oblivious that Nivi, Divya and her mom Hemlata knew from the beginning that somehow if the marriage happens with Sid, being the person Sid is, Sid can be emotionally blackmailed to get wifey status for Divya...
Good job creatives....you have indeed been able to establish the laws of "Kaliyug"...
Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki
